I-TASSER results

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2623

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>protein (297 residues)
MSSGNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGV
LRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLG
SGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAF
DEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVV
VRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARESLT

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSSGNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARESLT
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCEEEHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCEEEEEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCEEEEEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCEEEHCCCCC
Conf.Score	999999987799868999999999999999999899699999976887777777777567899999999999999999999976668866899998688899999998569899995899998666567858999999889989996688888778888758998789989999999999999998996999999768777777777869999999999999999999988998599999858899999999868999999679999865445688999999988998999868999
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSSGNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARESLT
Prediction	745544545413446315104302410030043270562301002033232342323442352035304510540262046126626616041313525114101520560200001212333243000011032004304000000112232222223340330030142045014200500543704300000021241332342325313530352045105503761571503230353400420152056024112312323103300010003200230502000335648
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Normalized B-facotr

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. (Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)

Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
Hit

Iden1

Iden2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
Align.

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

Sec.Str
Seq

CCCCCCCCCEEEHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCEEEEEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCEEEEEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCEEEHCCCCC
MSSGNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARESLT

3cisG

1.00

0.98

3.26

MUSTER

---GNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARES--

3cisG

1.00

0.98

5.63

dPPAS

---GNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARES--

3cisG

1.00

0.98

5.43

wdPPAS

---GNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARES--

3cisG

1.00

0.98

3.92

wMUSTER

----NSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARES--

3cisG

1.00

0.98

4.56

wPPAS

---GNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARES--

3cisG

1.00

0.98

9.50

dPPAS2

---GNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARES--

3cisG

1.00

0.98

4.31

PPAS

---GNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARES--

3cisG

1.00

0.98

6.09

Env-PPAS

---GNSSLGIIVGIDDSPAAQVAVRWAARDAELRKIPLTLVHAVSPEVATWLEVPLPPGVLRWQQDHGRHLIDDALKVVEQASLRAGPPTVHSEIVPAAAVPTLVDMSKDAVLMVVGCLGSGRWPGRLLGSVSSGLLRHAHCPVVIIHDEDSVMPHPQQAPVLVGVDGSSASELATAIAFDEASRRNVDLVALHAWSDVDVSEWPGIDWPATQSMAEQVLAERLAGWQERYPNVAITRVVVRDQPARQLVQRSEEAQLVVVGSRGRGGYAGMLVGSVGETVAQLARTPVIVARES--

3ab7A

0.23

0.19

0.81

2.41

MUSTER

M-------RILLATDGSPQARGAEALAEWLAYKLSAPLTVLFVVDTRL----------ELERALALRGEAVLERVRQSALAAG-----VAVEAVLEEGVPHEAILRRARAADLLVLGRSDGFG----GLGSTADRVLRASPVPVLLAPGEPVEL-----EGALLGYDASESAVRALHALAPLARALGLGVRVVSVHED--------------PARAEAWALEAEAYLRDH--GVEASALVLGGDAADHLLRLQGPGDLLALGAPVR----RLVFGSTAERVIRNAQGPVLTAR----

3ab7A

0.23

0.19

0.81

3.83

dPPAS

-------MRILLATDGSPQARGAEALAEWLAYKLSAPLTVLFVVDTRLE----------LERALALRGEAVLERVRQSALAAG-----VAVEAVLEEGVPHEAILRRARAADLLVLGRSDGFG----GLGSTADRVLRASPVPVLLAPGEP-----VELEGALLGYDASESAVRALHALAPLARALGLGVRVVSVHED--------------PARAEAWALEAEAYLRDH--GVEASALVLGGDAADHLLRLQGPGDLLALGAPVR----RLVFGSTAERVIRNAQGPVLTAR----

(a)	Iden1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	Iden2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment.
(e)	Download Align. list the threading program used to identify the template provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates.

Top 1 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)

More about C-score

Local structure accuracy of first model

Download Model 1

C-score=1.90

Estimated TM-score = 0.98±0.04

Estimated RMSD = 2.4±1.8Å

Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)

Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov
1	3cisG	0.968	0.79	0.990	0.980
2	4r2jA	0.741	3.48	0.142	0.889
3	3loqA	0.731	3.33	0.176	0.862
4	3ab7A	0.727	2.32	0.213	0.801
5	3olqA	0.724	3.89	0.139	0.902
6	3mt0A	0.693	3.75	0.173	0.845
7	3g40A	0.613	3.82	0.103	0.784
8	2dhtA	0.464	5.64	0.122	0.721
9	1xgvA	0.462	5.76	0.118	0.727
10	4rbmA	0.459	5.47	0.060	0.697

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

Ligand binding sites

Rank	C-score	Cluster size	PDB Hit	Lig Name	Download Complex	Ligand Binding Site Residues
1	0.67	19	3cisA	ATP	Rep, Mult	13,14,15,17,20,41,43,100,116,117,119,120,121,122,123,127,130,131,132,133
2	0.66	19	3cisA	ATP	Rep, Mult	165,166,167,172,193,194,195,198,245,261,262,264,265,267,268,272,275,276,277,278
3	0.04	2	3cisB	MG	Rep, Mult	198,277
4	0.01	1	1xkdB	ICT	Rep, Mult	119,128,149
5	0.01	1	3dloB	UNK	Rep, Mult	166,167,194,195,262
6	0.01	1	3u0bA	NA	Rep, Mult	179,183,190
7	0.01	1	2cmjB	NAP	Rep, Mult	99,102,106,109

	Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
	Download the templates clustering results.
(a)	C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)	Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)	Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)	Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column. Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	EC Number	Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3kt8D	0.424	4.46	0.066	0.559	6.1.1.2	NA
2	0.060	1t09B	0.440	5.27	0.067	0.650	1.1.1.42	131,144
3	0.060	1x0lA	0.429	5.61	0.121	0.667	1.1.1.87	269
4	0.060	1ct9A	0.446	5.72	0.095	0.673	6.3.5.4	NA
5	0.060	3blvH	0.436	5.50	0.124	0.677	1.1.1.41	NA
6	0.060	1vlcA	0.431	5.53	0.134	0.670	1.1.1.85	NA
7	0.060	2dhtA	0.464	5.64	0.122	0.721	1.1.1.42	NA
8	0.060	3blvC	0.432	5.39	0.112	0.657	1.1.1.41	179,235
9	0.060	1xcoD	0.435	5.90	0.085	0.694	2.3.1.8	178,193,278,283
10	0.060	1vi1A	0.433	5.91	0.064	0.687	2.3.1.-	20,130
11	0.060	1u7nA	0.431	5.91	0.086	0.680	2.3.1.-	261
12	0.060	1cvrA	0.450	5.48	0.089	0.687	3.4.22.37	117
13	0.060	1t09A	0.441	5.43	0.051	0.660	1.1.1.42	260
14	0.060	1cm7A	0.438	5.51	0.131	0.680	1.1.1.85	73
15	0.060	1xgvA	0.462	5.76	0.118	0.727	1.1.1.42	NA
16	0.060	1xc6A	0.420	6.02	0.059	0.697	3.2.1.23	NA
17	0.060	3khuB	0.435	4.39	0.086	0.576	1.1.1.22	172,177
18	0.060	2iv0A	0.458	5.74	0.110	0.724	1.1.1.42	149
19	0.060	2qfwD	0.431	5.56	0.070	0.663	1.1.1.42	153

(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Rank	Cscore^GO	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	PDB Hit	Associated GO Terms
Homologous GO templates in PDB
0	0.71	0.968	0.79	0.99	0.98	3cisG	GO:0000166 GO:0001666 GO:0005524 GO:0005618 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006950 GO:0009405 GO:0040007 GO:0040008 GO:0085014
1	0.67	0.860	0.86	0.98	0.88	2jaxA	GO:0000166 GO:0001666 GO:0005524 GO:0005618 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006950 GO:0009405 GO:0040007 GO:0040008 GO:0085014
2	0.46	0.725	2.12	0.22	0.79	3ab7B	GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0006950
3	0.41	0.750	3.48	0.17	0.89	3loqA	GO:0000166 GO:0006950
4	0.37	0.760	2.61	0.22	0.86	3ab8A	GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0006950
5	0.31	0.737	3.77	0.14	0.91	4wy2A	GO:0006950
6	0.31	0.385	2.14	0.22	0.42	3dloD	GO:0006950
7	0.30	0.741	3.78	0.14	0.91	4r2kA	GO:0005737 GO:0006950
8	0.27	0.698	3.76	0.17	0.85	3mt0A	GO:0006950
9	0.24	0.423	2.54	0.20	0.47	3hgmA	GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006950
10	0.22	0.389	3.06	0.23	0.44	5ahwC	GO:0000166 GO:0006950
11	0.22	0.376	2.60	0.24	0.41	5ahwB	GO:0000166 GO:0006950
12	0.19	0.350	2.93	0.22	0.41	3tnjA	GO:0000166 GO:0005737 GO:0006950
13	0.18	0.426	2.24	0.24	0.46	3s3tA	GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006950
14	0.18	0.377	2.99	0.16	0.43	3idfA	GO:0006950
15	0.18	0.411	2.50	0.18	0.46	1mjhB	GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006950
16	0.17	0.357	2.90	0.17	0.40	2gm3A	GO:0005886 GO:0006950 GO:0016208
17	0.16	0.381	2.61	0.28	0.43	4wnyA	GO:0006950
18	0.15	0.403	2.10	0.17	0.44	4r2lA	GO:0006950
19	0.15	0.356	2.95	0.25	0.41	1tq8A	GO:0005618 GO:0005886 GO:0006950 GO:0046677
20	0.11	0.379	2.26	0.20	0.41	3fdxA	GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0006950

Consensus prediction of GO terms

Molecular Function	GO:0005524
GO-Score	0.97
Biological Processes	GO:0040008	GO:0001666	GO:0085014	GO:0009405
GO-Score	0.91	0.91	0.91	0.91
Cellular Component	GO:0005618	GO:0005886	GO:0005829
GO-Score	0.91	0.91	0.91

(a)	Cscore^GO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)	The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on Cscore^GO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1.	J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2.	J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.	A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.	Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.