[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2597

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 8 1jacA AMG Rep, Mult 114,116,164,165,166,168
20.08 6 3mitA MAN Rep, Mult 59,93,95,132,133,134
30.06 5 3lm1A III Rep, Mult 96,97,98,99,100,101,124
40.05 4 2gucA MAN Rep, Mult 68,113,114,116,118,136,137
50.04 3 1jotA III Rep, Mult 41,111,115,117,139,140,141,143,168,169,170,171,172,173,174
60.02 2 2bn0A BGC Rep, Mult 61,62,63,89,90,91,166
70.02 2 3ginA CA Rep, Mult 99,158,180,184
80.02 2 2bmzB XLM Rep, Mult 66,67,69,91,166
90.02 2 3t91A MN Rep, Mult 126,167
100.01 1 3mflB DHY Rep, Mult 50,66
110.01 1 2dsdB AMP Rep, Mult 183,184
120.01 1 2zyqB TAR Rep, Mult 55,56
130.01 1 3mxgD XLS Rep, Mult 167,177
140.01 1 1jacG III Rep, Mult 59,67,95,97,118,119,120,121,122,123,124
150.01 1 2wsc2 CLA Rep, Mult 81,84,91
160.01 1 3e9tB CA Rep, Mult 99,158,184

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601kblA0.3905.380.0410.6652.7.9.1NA
20.0601eulA0.2785.900.0160.4953.6.3.8NA
30.0601k32A0.3745.900.0870.6803.4.21.-NA
40.0602w68C0.2945.720.0380.5053.2.1.18105,126,180
50.0602v5aB0.3735.290.0630.6126.3.4.1454,122
60.0602wybB0.3805.540.0460.6413.5.1.97NA
70.0601l9mB0.3825.930.0760.6842.3.2.13NA
80.0601y9mA0.3616.150.0300.6753.2.1.80NA
90.0601c9uB0.3656.000.0160.6801.1.5.2,1.1.99.17NA
100.0601a6qA0.3395.910.0690.6213.1.3.16NA
110.0601sllA0.3855.910.0610.7144.2.2.15NA
120.0601kc7A0.3925.440.0420.6702.7.9.1NA
130.0602vqdA0.3745.080.0680.6026.3.4.14,6.4.1.254
140.0601sliA0.3825.980.0610.7144.2.2.15,3.2.1.18NA
150.0601f1sA0.3805.740.0580.6704.2.2.1NA
160.0601yniB0.3785.760.0400.6703.5.3.23182
170.0603dt7A0.3825.810.0380.6754.1.1.3261
180.0601cb8A0.3775.840.0530.6704.2.2.5NA
190.0601uwkA0.3915.730.0330.6844.2.1.4996,121,171

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.150.7831.990.120.853x0uA GO:0009405
10.080.5482.620.090.653aqgB GO:0001895 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0030246 GO:0070062
20.080.5532.970.070.673apaA GO:0005576 GO:0005578 GO:0005794 GO:0005796 GO:0006810 GO:0015031 GO:0030246 GO:0031012 GO:0031410 GO:0042589 GO:0060205
30.080.6323.180.040.793eb7A GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
40.080.5462.790.060.661xxqA GO:0030246
50.070.5112.730.040.611jotA GO:0030246
60.070.6253.370.060.804moaA GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
70.070.6243.230.040.791ji6A GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
80.070.6063.950.050.822c9kA GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
90.070.5933.610.060.784w8jA GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
100.070.5764.180.060.801i5pA GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
110.070.5693.920.020.764d8mA GO:0009405 GO:0030435
120.060.6253.160.060.791dlcA GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
130.060.5903.720.060.771ciyA GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
140.060.3326.090.050.634v6wAg GO:0000398 GO:0005080 GO:0005737 GO:0005776 GO:0005829 GO:0005875 GO:0007626 GO:0009267 GO:0016243 GO:0018991 GO:0035220 GO:0042335 GO:0044829 GO:0045725 GO:0046716 GO:0048477 GO:0071011 GO:0071013 GO:0075522
150.060.2986.240.020.564bvkB GO:0016787
160.060.2776.020.040.501xv2C GO:0045151 GO:0047605
170.060.2905.840.040.524k3vB GO:0006810 GO:0007155 GO:0030001 GO:0046872
180.060.2655.730.070.463o38A GO:0004316 GO:0016491 GO:0055114 GO:0102132
190.060.2565.610.040.442hhiA GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0009267
200.060.2255.230.050.372rb4A GO:0000166 GO:0003676 GO:0003723 GO:0004004 GO:0004386 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006406 GO:0006417 GO:0006810 GO:0007275 GO:0007283 GO:0007286 GO:0010501 GO:0016787 GO:0030154 GO:0033391 GO:0051028
210.060.2445.470.020.414pzkA GO:0001510 GO:0003723 GO:0005737 GO:0006396 GO:0008033 GO:0008168 GO:0008173 GO:0008175 GO:0008757 GO:0016740 GO:0030488 GO:0032259
220.060.2484.260.070.361yo7A GO:0006351 GO:0006355


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005488
GO-Score 0.35
Biological Processes GO:0051704
GO-Score 0.44
Cellular Component GO:0070062 GO:0005615 GO:0005796 GO:0005578 GO:0060205 GO:0042589
GO-Score 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.