[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2522c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 4 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.45 46 2zofA MN Rep, Mult 139,171,435
20.38 41 2zofA MN Rep, Mult 106,139,140,170,197
30.26 21 2zofB BES Rep, Mult 106,139,170,171,197,198,199,212,215,335,369,403,405,406,407,435
40.02 2 2zofA BES Rep, Mult 230,233,323
50.01 2 4g1pA CYS Rep, Mult 215,335,369,406,435
60.01 2 2pokA BGC Rep, Mult 269,270,272,375,376,377
70.01 2 2pokA BGC Rep, Mult 99,381,385,459
80.00 1 3x3eA LYS Rep, Mult 170,171,172,174,215,335,406
90.00 1 3pfeA IMD Rep, Mult 403,428

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.6003dljA0.9091.550.2650.9403.4.13.20170
20.3791lfwA0.6983.430.1870.7963.4.13.3170
30.3451f2oA0.4612.980.1650.5153.4.11.24170
40.3421ampA0.4913.190.0930.5573.4.11.10170
50.3331r3nA0.6084.470.1100.7703.5.1.6170
60.3111cg2A0.6204.640.1470.7873.4.17.11106,139,169,170,435
70.2893ic1A0.5653.600.1690.6473.5.1.18106,139,170,171
80.1762zofA0.9391.070.2720.9553.4.13.18170
90.0672afmA0.4863.490.1190.5572.3.2.5170
100.0663kl9A0.4843.160.1270.5493.4.11.7139,405,436
110.0601fnoA0.6044.000.1450.7363.4.11.4139,170,173,197,405
120.0601vgyA0.5994.470.1760.7533.5.1.18108
130.0603d66A0.4034.160.0760.4943.4.17.20NA
140.0603ij3A0.4074.910.0890.5283.4.11.1NA
150.0603ifeA0.5814.740.0960.7513.4.11.4139,170,197
160.0602ewbA0.4254.760.1260.5403.4.11.1,3.4.11.538
170.0601zg7A0.3973.990.0960.4813.4.17.2NA
180.0603fedA0.4763.150.1180.5403.4.17.21170
190.0601cpbB0.2525.330.0670.3383.4.17.2179
200.0601gytJ0.4284.560.0970.5383.4.11.1NA
210.0601z2lA0.5884.600.1100.7513.5.3.-170
220.0602zeeA0.4853.510.1190.5572.3.2.5441
230.0602v77A0.3984.130.0690.4873.4.17.1NA
240.0601h8lA0.4164.040.0380.5063.4.17.22NA
250.0603gb0A0.6053.960.1510.7303.4.11.-NA
260.0602qyvA0.6573.350.1570.7473.4.13.344
270.0601kwmA0.4004.510.0790.5003.4.17.2NA
280.0601z8lA0.4763.050.1300.5383.4.17.21170

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.620.9391.070.270.962zofA GO:0004180 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0016805 GO:0034701 GO:0043171 GO:0046872 GO:0070062 GO:0070573 GO:0102008
10.600.9091.550.270.943dljA GO:0004180 GO:0005576 GO:0005829 GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0016805 GO:0032268 GO:0034701 GO:0043171 GO:0046872 GO:0070573
20.540.8422.860.220.943pfeA GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0046872
30.520.9261.340.260.954g1pA GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0006751 GO:0008152 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008242 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0016805 GO:0034701 GO:0043171 GO:0046872 GO:0070573
40.470.7093.140.170.803ki9A GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0016805 GO:0046872
50.460.8032.810.200.904mmoA GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0043171 GO:0046872 GO:0070573
60.430.7732.680.180.843pfoA GO:0008152 GO:0008777 GO:0016787 GO:0016813 GO:0046872
70.390.7164.680.170.902pokA GO:0008152 GO:0016787
80.370.6983.430.190.801lfwA GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0016805 GO:0046872
90.370.6083.900.200.724o23A GO:0008152 GO:0008270 GO:0008652 GO:0009014 GO:0009085 GO:0009089 GO:0016787 GO:0019877 GO:0046872 GO:0050897
100.350.6743.280.140.784mmoB GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0043171 GO:0046872 GO:0070573
110.300.5653.600.170.653ic1A GO:0005829 GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0008652 GO:0009014 GO:0009085 GO:0009089 GO:0016787 GO:0019877 GO:0043171 GO:0046872 GO:0050897 GO:0070573
120.290.6563.140.200.742rb7A GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008237 GO:0016787
130.270.5934.010.170.713ct9B GO:0006508 GO:0006526 GO:0008152 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0008777 GO:0016787 GO:0043171 GO:0070573
140.230.5744.240.190.714q7aA GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0009085 GO:0016787 GO:0016811 GO:0050897
150.200.5052.150.200.544h2kA GO:0005829 GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0008652 GO:0009014 GO:0009085 GO:0009089 GO:0016787 GO:0019877 GO:0043171 GO:0046872 GO:0050897 GO:0070573
160.080.5042.610.220.554onwA GO:0005829 GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0008652 GO:0009014 GO:0009085 GO:0009089 GO:0016787 GO:0019877 GO:0043171 GO:0046872 GO:0050897 GO:0070573
170.080.6533.130.190.733x3eB GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0008270 GO:0008652 GO:0009085 GO:0016787 GO:0016811 GO:0019878 GO:0046872 GO:0050897
180.070.6204.640.150.791cg2A GO:0004180 GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0016787 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0008270 GO:0034701 GO:0070573 GO:0004180 GO:0102008 GO:0008242
GO-Score 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.62 0.52
Biological Processes GO:0006508 GO:0032268 GO:0006751
GO-Score 0.96 0.60 0.52
Cellular Component GO:0005829 GO:0005654 GO:0070062
GO-Score 0.85 0.62 0.62

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.