[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2516c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 4 5jrcC CA Rep, Mult 63,102,106
20.04 2 3c67A GLC Rep, Mult 114,115,116,117,118,123
30.04 2 3slpC NUC Rep, Mult 111,119
40.02 1 1xjmB TTP Rep, Mult 28,68
50.02 1 4ytrC TGK Rep, Mult 112,174
60.02 1 1pumA UUU Rep, Mult 123,126
70.02 1 3lv4A CA Rep, Mult 124,267
80.02 1 3iukA MG Rep, Mult 257,267
90.02 1 3my9A MG Rep, Mult 104,107
100.02 1 3ef2A CA Rep, Mult 12,14
110.02 1 1bjpA OXP Rep, Mult 123,131
120.02 1 3c67B GLC Rep, Mult 100,137,140,141,144
130.02 1 1r3nC BIB Rep, Mult 136,196,253,254
140.02 1 1jm0A DMS Rep, Mult 141,142,145,168
150.02 1 1brrC ARC Rep, Mult 145,164,168
160.02 1 3fwsB MG Rep, Mult 108,110,111
170.02 1 1jb0M CLA Rep, Mult 163,167
180.02 1 3osuA MG Rep, Mult 102,161

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601tr1D0.4865.360.0650.7493.2.1.21NA
20.0601bgaA0.4895.410.0770.7533.2.1.21NA
30.0601wcgA0.4855.310.0490.7453.2.1.147NA
40.0602dgaA0.4895.270.0490.7423.2.1.21NA
50.0602e3zA0.4895.350.0560.7533.2.1.21NA
60.0603gnrA0.4855.330.0690.7453.2.1.213
70.0601qoxM0.4875.390.0730.7493.2.1.21NA
80.0602a3lA0.4795.470.0480.7603.5.4.6NA
90.0601wdpA0.4715.850.0550.7833.2.1.2NA
100.0601e1eB0.4805.780.0710.7793.2.1.21NA
110.0601np2A0.4885.360.0690.7493.2.1.21NA
120.0602jieA0.4835.320.0570.7453.2.1.21NA
130.0601b1yA0.4755.770.0430.7943.2.1.2NA
140.0602pbgA0.4825.530.0450.7493.2.1.85NA
150.0603cmjA0.4875.510.0570.7603.2.1.21NA
160.0603f4vA0.4815.480.0440.7533.2.1.21NA
170.0601myrA0.4825.580.0370.7533.2.1.147NA
180.0601od0B0.4875.310.0730.7453.2.1.21NA
190.0602jf6B0.4905.380.0520.7533.2.1.105NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.120.4875.310.070.751od0B GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0102483
10.070.4825.530.040.752pbgA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0005990 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0019512 GO:0033920
20.070.4885.330.060.753ta9A GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0102483
30.070.4885.400.090.751gnxA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0102483
40.070.4885.360.070.751np2A GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0102483
50.070.4865.430.070.753vifA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0102483
60.070.4885.400.080.753ahyB GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008422
70.070.4855.480.060.764ha3A GO:0004553 GO:0004565 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
80.070.4875.310.040.744ipnE GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008706 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
90.070.4785.250.070.743wdpP GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
100.070.4695.860.060.771qvbA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016798
110.070.4875.390.070.751qoxA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0102483
120.070.4905.430.040.763u57A GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0009820 GO:0009821 GO:0016740 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0050247 GO:0050506
130.070.4785.400.040.745fooA GO:0004553 GO:0005975
140.070.4875.400.060.753w53A GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0102483
150.070.4855.390.070.753gnoA GO:0004553 GO:0004565 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0033907 GO:0042973 GO:0080079 GO:0080083 GO:0102483 GO:1901657
160.070.4855.310.050.751wcgA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0019137 GO:0046872
170.070.4895.350.060.752e3zA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0080079 GO:0102483
180.070.4945.310.070.753ahxA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0102483


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0015926
GO-Score 0.57
Biological Processes GO:0051275 GO:0030243
GO-Score 0.57 0.57
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.