[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2514c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.17 6 4xgqA MG Rep, Mult 6,7,48,98,99
20.11 5 2bsq1 III Rep, Mult 43,44,47,50,51,75,78,79,81,82,85,86,101
30.04 2 2bq8X ZN Rep, Mult 48,54
40.04 2 3qe4B 4CF Rep, Mult 4,5,6,42,45,106,109
50.04 2 2h1cA III Rep, Mult 10,11,13,14,15,16,26,30,31,55,58,63
60.02 1 2fe10 III Rep, Mult 43,44,46,47,48,50,57,58,61,68,78,79,82,85,86,96,98,101
70.02 1 2xblA M7P Rep, Mult 48,52
80.02 1 1bofA MG Rep, Mult 8,152
90.02 1 2h1cA MG Rep, Mult 4,5,40,41,45
100.02 1 2h1cA MG Rep, Mult 41,68,69,70,105
110.02 1 3h87A MG Rep, Mult 99,117

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603afhA0.5604.510.0560.8896.1.1.1711,122
20.0602j5bA0.5804.150.0680.8636.1.1.1NA
30.0602a4mC0.5554.190.0350.8566.1.1.26,124
40.0602ja2A0.5624.550.0900.8956.1.1.17NA
50.0603fi0G0.5624.080.0710.8506.1.1.2125
60.0602el7A0.5654.090.0690.8696.1.1.2NA
70.0603n9iA0.5654.020.0690.8566.1.1.215
80.0602yy5B0.5744.130.0410.8766.1.1.2NA
90.0603fnrA0.5744.430.0680.8826.1.1.19NA
100.0602x1lA0.5684.510.0480.9156.1.1.10NA
110.0602zufA0.5694.670.0610.9486.1.1.19NA
120.0603fhjD0.5704.000.0760.8636.1.1.2NA
130.0602o5rA0.5514.430.0630.8696.1.1.17NA
140.0602cycB0.5834.130.0550.8636.1.1.15
150.0602yy5D0.5744.120.0410.8766.1.1.2NA
160.0601euqA0.5494.560.0610.8826.1.1.18NA
170.0601r6tA0.5593.990.0630.8436.1.1.2105
180.0601u0bB0.5634.470.0470.8896.1.1.16NA
190.0603kt8D0.5684.040.0550.8566.1.1.250

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.360.7391.770.160.823zvkA GO:0000287 GO:0004518 GO:0004540 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501
10.240.6732.660.200.824chgA GO:0000287 GO:0001666 GO:0004518 GO:0004540 GO:0016787 GO:0040008 GO:0045926 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501
20.230.6382.490.170.763dboB GO:0000287 GO:0004518 GO:0004521 GO:0004540 GO:0005576 GO:0016787 GO:0040007 GO:0040008 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501 GO:0090502
30.230.6642.600.130.804xgqA GO:0000287 GO:0004518 GO:0004540 GO:0016787 GO:0045926 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501
40.230.6922.600.150.852bsqA GO:0000287 GO:0003677 GO:0004518 GO:0004540 GO:0016787 GO:0044001 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501
50.220.6483.280.120.861y82A GO:0000287 GO:0004518 GO:0004540 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501
60.220.6752.610.120.823h87B GO:0000287 GO:0004518 GO:0004540 GO:0016787 GO:0017148 GO:0040008 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501
70.210.5642.830.170.712lcqA GO:0000287 GO:0003723 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0004540 GO:0016787 GO:0019843 GO:0042254 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501
80.210.7022.170.150.815ecdA GO:0000287 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0004540 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501
90.180.5704.010.060.863prhA GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004830 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006436 GO:0016874
100.170.6513.040.110.841w8iA GO:0000287 GO:0004518 GO:0004540 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501
110.130.5804.150.070.862j5bA GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004831 GO:0005524 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0016874 GO:0042802
120.120.6473.300.130.861ye5B GO:0000287 GO:0004518 GO:0004540 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090501
130.070.5864.190.050.872cycA GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004831 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006437 GO:0016874
140.070.5923.730.070.863p0iA GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004831 GO:0004832 GO:0005524 GO:0005829 GO:0006418 GO:0006438 GO:0016874
150.070.5744.130.040.882yy5B GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004830 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006436 GO:0016874
160.070.5784.090.080.864nx2A GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004831 GO:0004832 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006437 GO:0006438 GO:0016874
170.070.5943.900.050.873vgjB GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004831 GO:0005524 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006437 GO:0016874 GO:0044164 GO:0046789
180.070.5773.920.060.863tzlB GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004830 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006436 GO:0016874
190.070.5704.000.080.863fhjD GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004830 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006436 GO:0016874


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004540 GO:0000287 GO:0004519 GO:0003676
GO-Score 0.78 0.78 0.46 0.45
Biological Processes GO:0090501 GO:0036293 GO:0006950 GO:0051815 GO:0044000 GO:0045926
GO-Score 0.78 0.49 0.49 0.45 0.45 0.42
Cellular Component GO:0005576
GO-Score 0.23

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.