[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2491

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.56 16 3sbxF AMP Rep, Mult 33,34,35,68,107,110,111,127,128,129,130,132,133
20.10 5 2iegA FRY Rep, Mult 32,33,34,44,48,185,187
30.05 2 3sbxE AMP Rep, Mult 136,139
40.02 1 3maj0 III Rep, Mult 44,148,151,183,185

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.3082q4dA0.7052.030.2050.7833.2.2.-62,122,129,132
20.1792a0kA0.4713.920.0780.6182.4.2.6111,133
30.1251f8xA0.4733.480.0640.6042.4.2.6133
40.0661e20A0.5263.880.0810.7054.1.1.36NA
50.0662o6lB0.5013.630.0620.6672.4.1.1735,59
60.0601q0lA0.5244.240.0670.7441.1.1.26749,64,124,133
70.0601ygpA0.5844.150.1110.8122.4.1.1NA
80.0601r0lC0.5384.230.0790.7491.1.1.26758
90.0603i39X0.6334.100.0890.8601.2.99.2153
100.0601fa9A0.5704.160.0760.8212.4.1.140
110.0601e5dA0.5354.100.0580.7201.-.-.-NA
120.0601v4vA0.5493.880.1010.7345.1.3.14NA
130.0601e1yA0.5714.160.0520.8162.4.1.140
140.0603cf4A0.6043.860.1010.8071.2.99.2NA
150.0602q4oA0.6951.790.2050.7583.2.2.-63,126,133
160.0601d7oA0.5284.670.1030.7581.3.1.968
170.0603gpbA0.5854.140.0760.8162.4.1.1NA
180.0601chdA0.5253.940.0870.7103.1.1.61NA
190.0602z8yP0.5574.090.1170.7732.3.1.169NA
200.0602qllA0.5714.180.0810.8212.4.1.1NA
210.0601f6dA0.5643.820.1240.7445.1.3.1473
220.0603drwA0.5314.540.0810.7582.7.1.146NA
230.0601cjyA0.5445.030.0930.8503.1.1.4,3.1.1.5NA
240.0602r4uA0.5504.410.1120.7682.4.1.21NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.580.8791.390.250.931wekA GO:0009691 GO:0016787 GO:0016799
10.350.7052.690.210.831t35E GO:0005829 GO:0009691 GO:0016799
20.340.6802.230.290.762iz7A GO:0005829 GO:0009691 GO:0016799
30.330.7591.600.200.823quaA GO:0009691 GO:0016787 GO:0016799
40.320.7352.030.200.822q4dA GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0009691 GO:0016787 GO:0016799 GO:0042803
50.310.8092.610.150.943gh1A GO:0005829 GO:0009691 GO:0016799
60.290.7091.720.220.771wehA GO:0016020 GO:0016021
70.280.6882.240.230.771rcuA GO:0005829 GO:0009691 GO:0016799
80.280.7151.770.200.782a33A GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0009691 GO:0016787 GO:0016799
90.120.4973.730.110.641j2rA GO:0003824 GO:0005829 GO:0006769 GO:0008152 GO:0008936 GO:0016787 GO:0019674
100.070.4375.020.100.701g69B GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0004789 GO:0005737 GO:0009228 GO:0009229 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
110.060.4295.330.070.692xtzC GO:0000166 GO:0001789 GO:0003924 GO:0004871 GO:0005095 GO:0005525 GO:0005789 GO:0005834 GO:0005886 GO:0006571 GO:0007165 GO:0007186 GO:0008219 GO:0009094 GO:0009506 GO:0009738 GO:0009740 GO:0009749 GO:0009785 GO:0009788 GO:0009789 GO:0009845 GO:0010027 GO:0010119 GO:0010244 GO:0016020 GO:0016247 GO:0019001 GO:0031683 GO:0034260 GO:0042127 GO:0046872 GO:0071215 GO:0072593
120.060.3725.300.020.593icqT GO:0000049 GO:0003723 GO:0005525 GO:0005634 GO:0005635 GO:0005643 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006409 GO:0006605 GO:0006810 GO:0008033 GO:0008536 GO:0015932 GO:0016363 GO:0071528
130.060.3235.010.030.523o3fA GO:0003676 GO:0003723 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0004523 GO:0005737 GO:0006298 GO:0006401 GO:0016787 GO:0030145 GO:0032299 GO:0043137 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090502
140.060.2905.300.020.471cbkA GO:0000166 GO:0003848 GO:0005524 GO:0009396 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0046654 GO:0046656
150.060.2745.610.060.452l5aA GO:0000086 GO:0000780 GO:0000786 GO:0000788 GO:0003677 GO:0005634 GO:0005694 GO:0006333 GO:0006334 GO:0007059 GO:0031298 GO:0034729 GO:0042393 GO:0043935 GO:0046982 GO:0051382 GO:0061587 GO:0071459 GO:0097030 GO:2000059
160.060.2455.460.080.434chdA GO:0003723 GO:0003968 GO:0006351 GO:0006370 GO:0006397 GO:0019012 GO:0042025 GO:0075526
170.060.2114.610.040.312ly8A GO:0000070 GO:0000775 GO:0000776 GO:0000777 GO:0000780 GO:0000786 GO:0003677 GO:0005634 GO:0005694 GO:0005727 GO:0019237 GO:0030543 GO:0043505 GO:0043565 GO:0046982
180.060.1894.060.070.262l5fA GO:0000398 GO:0003723 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005685 GO:0005737 GO:0006397 GO:0007010 GO:0007049 GO:0008360 GO:0008380 GO:0016020 GO:0016363 GO:0016477 GO:0016607 GO:0032465 GO:0044822 GO:0051301 GO:0070064 GO:0071004
190.060.1604.430.050.232hldQ GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005756 GO:0006754 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0015986 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016787 GO:0016887 GO:0045261 GO:0046933 GO:0046961


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016799 GO:0042803
GO-Score 0.92 0.32
Biological Processes GO:0009691
GO-Score 0.92
Cellular Component GO:0005829 GO:0005634
GO-Score 0.71 0.32

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.