[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2474c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.12 7 4xymC COA Rep, Mult 8,9,16,17,36,37,38,56,57,58,75,97,98,150,189,190
20.07 4 3bxxA QUE Rep, Mult 98,100,115,116
30.03 2 3dayA UNX Rep, Mult 20,160,163
40.03 2 2xquB CVM Rep, Mult 123,127
50.03 2 1xcbA NAD Rep, Mult 16,17,20,152
60.03 2 4rlfA 3SK Rep, Mult 16,17,96,97,151,152,153,160,163,164
70.03 2 1yb1A AE2 Rep, Mult 77,129,132
80.02 1 1cpoA UUU Rep, Mult 167,169
90.02 1 5d51S KR Rep, Mult 5,7,20,31,168
100.02 1 2o01I CLA Rep, Mult 171,173
110.02 1 1z450 III Rep, Mult 65,66,70,73,77,114,120,124,125,128,129
120.02 1 2f2hA XTG Rep, Mult 144,145
130.02 1 2wse1 CLA Rep, Mult 172,173,198
140.02 1 2islB OXY Rep, Mult 107,160
150.02 1 2dysG DMU Rep, Mult 98,100

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0661he4A0.5533.670.0680.7331.3.1.24,1.5.1.30174
20.0663e9nG0.5124.100.0890.7101.1.1.36167
30.0663e9nA0.5114.120.0960.7101.1.1.36NA
40.0603dwfB0.5914.110.0780.8251.1.1.146NA
50.0603ch6B0.5944.050.0890.8251.1.1.146NA
60.0601y5mA0.5924.050.0630.8251.1.1.146NA
70.0602et6A0.6333.990.0870.8891.1.1.-NA
80.0603enkA0.6104.310.0730.8715.1.3.2NA
90.0601keuA0.6134.240.0580.8574.2.1.46NA
100.0601y1pA0.6184.310.0830.8711.1.1.2NA
110.0601z45A0.6074.370.0460.8715.1.3.2,5.1.3.3NA
120.0601udpB0.5994.410.0520.8625.1.3.2NA
130.0602c20A0.6044.330.0580.8665.1.3.2NA
140.0601sb8A0.6034.200.0790.8575.1.3.7NA
150.0601rpnC0.5944.120.0960.8434.2.1.47NA
160.0601a4uA0.5944.010.0600.8161.1.1.1114
170.0602hunA0.6114.270.0420.8624.2.1.46NA
180.0601kerB0.6044.240.0420.8534.2.1.46NA
190.0601i3kA0.6014.450.0840.8665.1.3.2NA
200.0601bxkB0.6104.300.0580.8624.2.1.46NA
210.0602p5uA0.5993.980.0930.8305.1.3.2NA
220.0603m2pA0.6034.430.0630.8625.1.3.7166

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.080.6333.990.090.892et6A GO:0003824 GO:0005777 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0055114
10.070.6024.070.070.843u9lA GO:0004316 GO:0016491 GO:0055114 GO:0102132
20.070.5764.080.100.804bmvC GO:0000166
30.070.5984.180.100.844kzpC GO:0004316 GO:0016491 GO:0055114 GO:0102132
40.070.5944.010.060.821a4uA GO:0004022 GO:0006066 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0042802 GO:0055114
50.070.5993.890.120.822gdzA GO:0003824 GO:0004957 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006693 GO:0007179 GO:0007565 GO:0007567 GO:0016323 GO:0016404 GO:0016491 GO:0019372 GO:0030728 GO:0042803 GO:0045786 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:0070062 GO:0070403 GO:0070493 GO:0097070 GO:2001300
60.070.5783.840.100.783lqfA GO:0000166
70.070.5654.100.100.803gvcB GO:0016491 GO:0055114
80.070.5594.000.100.774jigA GO:0016491 GO:0055114
90.070.5704.010.100.782jahC GO:0000166
100.070.5744.170.110.814trrB GO:0003858 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
110.070.5833.880.060.801bdbA GO:0016491 GO:0016628 GO:0018509 GO:0019439 GO:0055114
120.070.5704.020.070.793rd5A
130.070.5793.850.110.792b4qA GO:0004316 GO:0016491 GO:0055114 GO:0102132
140.070.5704.050.080.793uf0A GO:0000166 GO:0008678 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
150.070.5704.000.110.794yqzA GO:0016491 GO:0055114
160.070.5773.940.100.803ak4A GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
170.070.5733.990.100.792d1yC GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
180.070.5654.120.080.792bfpD GO:0004799 GO:0006729 GO:0016491 GO:0019889 GO:0031427 GO:0032259 GO:0034599 GO:0047040 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003824
GO-Score 0.35
Biological Processes GO:0044710
GO-Score 0.50
Cellular Component GO:0005777
GO-Score 0.08

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.