[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2468c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.06 3 3jruB CO3 Rep, Mult 133,134,135,136,160
20.06 3 3e7lC ZN Rep, Mult 148,151
30.04 2 1cgpA CMP Rep, Mult 157,161
40.04 2 3qmeA CYH Rep, Mult 78,106,107,117,120,153,157,160
50.04 2 3b7aA EOH Rep, Mult 78,108,109,116,153,156,157,160
60.02 1 2wl3A CA Rep, Mult 111,151
70.02 1 4oa3A CA Rep, Mult 69,75
80.02 1 2qtgA MTH Rep, Mult 116,118
90.02 1 3kzwD NA Rep, Mult 69,72,158,161,162
100.02 1 3pvhA CA Rep, Mult 16,34,35,81
110.02 1 1gk9B EDO Rep, Mult 103,105,107
120.02 1 4h6pC FMN Rep, Mult 120,161
130.02 1 5pgmE ALA Rep, Mult 130,132,133
140.02 1 3fltA CA Rep, Mult 145,148
150.02 1 3pw9A SER Rep, Mult 31,32,33,58
160.02 1 3o7uA ZN Rep, Mult 50,93
170.02 1 3a0bX CLA Rep, Mult 149,152,153,156
180.02 1 4ro2B GLY Rep, Mult 154,157

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0663g98A0.4522.770.0640.5636.1.1.7NA
20.0601obrA0.4815.030.0320.8263.4.17.18NA
30.0601gytA0.5294.860.0570.8683.4.11.1158
40.0601gc5A0.4794.170.0510.7132.7.1.147NA
50.0603ifeA0.5095.340.0440.9163.4.11.488
60.0603fedA0.4955.100.0330.8683.4.17.21NA
70.0602veoB0.5104.610.0480.8083.1.1.361
80.0602qb7A0.5074.160.0710.7493.6.1.11NA
90.0603ij3A0.5065.100.0570.8743.4.11.1NA
100.0601jjfA0.4804.810.0450.7903.2.1.863
110.0601e5tA0.4885.300.0780.8443.4.21.26NA
120.0601r3nA0.4765.360.0810.8683.5.1.6NA
130.0602hb6A0.5165.000.0700.8743.4.11.1158
140.0603d68C0.4785.070.0680.8203.4.17.20NA
150.0601jqgA0.4875.140.0950.8203.4.17.1NA
160.0601ua4A0.5284.230.0610.7782.7.1.147120
170.0601fnoA0.4855.470.0630.8923.4.11.4126
180.0602ewbA0.5244.870.0380.8623.4.11.1,3.4.11.5NA
190.0601wb4B0.4794.690.0650.7843.2.1.897
200.0603ic1A0.4785.170.0710.8323.5.1.18NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.260.6901.320.160.732lt2A GO:0046872
10.230.7052.160.120.823ptjA GO:0003993 GO:0009507 GO:0009534 GO:0009535 GO:0009536 GO:0009579 GO:0010206 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016311 GO:0031977
20.230.5224.890.040.863jruA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
30.200.7441.990.120.852kw7A GO:0016020 GO:0016021
40.070.4522.770.060.563g98A GO:0000049 GO:0000166 GO:0003676 GO:0003723 GO:0004812 GO:0004813 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006400 GO:0006412 GO:0006419 GO:0008270 GO:0016597 GO:0016874 GO:0016876 GO:0043039 GO:0046872
50.070.5284.230.060.781ua4A GO:0000287 GO:0004340 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0006006 GO:0006096 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0043843 GO:0046872 GO:0051156
60.070.4995.110.070.874ksiA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
70.070.5233.240.060.653drwA GO:0000287 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0006000 GO:0006096 GO:0008443 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0043844 GO:0046835 GO:0046872
80.070.4645.460.060.814efdA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008235 GO:0019538 GO:0030145
90.070.4854.550.040.735ck7A GO:0005576 GO:0005783 GO:0005975 GO:0006096 GO:0016020 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0043843 GO:0046872
100.070.4863.850.040.674b8rA GO:0000287 GO:0004340 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0006006 GO:0006096 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0043843 GO:0046872 GO:0051156
110.070.4564.230.050.681l2lA GO:0000287 GO:0004340 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0006006 GO:0006096 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0043843 GO:0046872 GO:0051156
120.060.5165.000.070.872hb6A GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0040009 GO:0042802 GO:0046662 GO:0046872
130.060.4104.680.040.631xl7B GO:0005102 GO:0005739 GO:0005777 GO:0006091 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0006810 GO:0008458 GO:0009437 GO:0010243 GO:0015908 GO:0015936 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0042493 GO:0043231 GO:0051791
140.060.3914.450.020.623k4oA GO:0000166 GO:0004349 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006561 GO:0008299 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0102043
150.060.5184.990.060.863peiA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
160.060.5244.870.040.862ewbA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005925 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0070062
170.060.3924.790.070.651gqoB GO:0003855 GO:0008652 GO:0009073 GO:0009423 GO:0016829
180.060.5065.100.060.873ij3A GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
190.060.4995.040.070.853h8eA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016791 GO:0008238 GO:0046914 GO:0008237
GO-Score 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Biological Processes GO:0030091 GO:0009765 GO:0006796
GO-Score 0.46 0.46 0.46
Cellular Component GO:0055035 GO:0009534 GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.46 0.46 0.39

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.