[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2411c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 2 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.15 10 2io8A ADP Rep, Mult 173,185,186,346,392,394,398,400,431,432,433,434,436,453,482,483,484
20.14 9 2hgsA MG Rep, Mult 186,188,398
30.03 2 3kalA SO4 Rep, Mult 171,186,188,398,474
40.02 1 1y10C CA Rep, Mult 274,276
50.02 1 3dr2B CA Rep, Mult 301,308
60.02 1 2ioaA GGA Rep, Mult 171,173,186,188,191,192,193,250,256,302,303,398,474,491
70.02 1 3fysA BR Rep, Mult 308,323,346
80.02 1 2b0qA MG Rep, Mult 453,494
90.02 1 3c46A 2HP Rep, Mult 327,331,332,333,334
100.02 1 2io9B GSH Rep, Mult 171,188,193,194,197,259,399,474,492
110.02 1 3kakA 3GC Rep, Mult 171,190,191,192,193,250,254,256,301
120.02 1 3e27A MG Rep, Mult 276,300
130.02 1 2io7A MG Rep, Mult 173,186
140.02 1 4ewlB GOL Rep, Mult 458,470,471

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.3153kakB0.5544.810.1070.6886.3.2.3193,474
20.3133kalA0.6114.570.1060.7486.3.2.3193,399,474
30.2672hgsA0.6034.600.1010.7466.3.2.3193,400,474
40.0603c46B0.3687.540.0510.5942.7.7.6307
50.0601ogyA0.3227.400.0380.5081.7.99.4NA
60.0601fdiA0.3207.500.0330.5101.2.1.2NA
70.0601m0wA0.6034.510.1430.7376.3.2.3474
80.0601jqnA0.3438.070.0630.5884.1.1.31NA
90.0603gidB0.3155.690.0720.4216.4.1.2,6.3.4.14NA
100.0602nyaF0.3217.330.0410.5031.7.99.4NA
110.0602v5aB0.3236.000.1130.4546.3.4.14194,232,260
120.0602wyoA0.5924.870.1040.7426.3.2.3186,369
130.0601h0hA0.3457.840.0480.5751.2.1.2NA
140.0601bxrA0.3346.190.0710.4756.3.5.5NA
150.0601gsaA0.3304.630.1580.4066.3.2.3233
160.0603i12A0.3235.110.0850.4126.3.2.4NA
170.0602yyaB0.3245.740.0850.4376.3.4.13NA
180.0602wyhA0.3297.340.0440.5153.2.1.24456
190.0601w93A0.3296.390.0720.4726.3.4.14,6.4.1.2NA
200.0603lp8A0.3265.640.0730.4376.3.4.13193
210.0602pffD0.3647.610.0400.5862.3.1.86NA
220.0601kqfA0.3417.810.0340.5591.2.1.2NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.230.6034.600.100.752hgsA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004363 GO:0005524 GO:0005829 GO:0006520 GO:0006750 GO:0006979 GO:0007399 GO:0007568 GO:0009410 GO:0016594 GO:0016874 GO:0031667 GO:0034612 GO:0042277 GO:0042803 GO:0043200 GO:0043295 GO:0046686 GO:0046872 GO:0070062
10.180.6034.510.140.741m0wA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004363 GO:0005524 GO:0005622 GO:0006750 GO:0016874 GO:0042803 GO:0043295 GO:0046872
20.070.6114.570.110.753kalA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004363 GO:0005524 GO:0006750 GO:0016874 GO:0042803 GO:0043295 GO:0046872
30.070.5924.870.100.742wyoA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004363 GO:0005524 GO:0006750 GO:0016874 GO:0042803 GO:0043295 GO:0046872
40.070.5544.810.110.693kakB GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004363 GO:0005524 GO:0006750 GO:0016874 GO:0042803 GO:0043295 GO:0046872
50.070.5654.980.100.712wyoC GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004363 GO:0005524 GO:0006750 GO:0016874 GO:0042803 GO:0043295 GO:0046872
60.060.2518.160.030.434xpqA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246
70.060.2498.270.030.441fwxA GO:0004129 GO:0005507 GO:0005509 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0019333 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0050304 GO:0055114 GO:1902600
80.060.2176.150.050.311afwB GO:0003729 GO:0003824 GO:0003988 GO:0005758 GO:0005777 GO:0005782 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
90.060.2226.020.050.311pv9A GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0016787 GO:0016805 GO:0046872 GO:0102009
100.060.2126.080.060.301pv9B GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0016787 GO:0016805 GO:0046872 GO:0102009
110.060.1986.740.050.304q05A GO:0008152 GO:0016787
120.060.1907.130.040.304on1A GO:0004222 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0031012 GO:0046872
130.060.2116.630.070.313a3uA GO:0009234 GO:0016829 GO:0016830
140.060.1916.480.080.285c8dE GO:0003677 GO:0006355 GO:0031419 GO:0046872
150.060.1946.660.070.295iz3A GO:0005975 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0042132 GO:0042578
160.060.1966.670.070.302y4rA GO:0003824 GO:0004084 GO:0006532 GO:0008152 GO:0008696 GO:0009098 GO:0009099 GO:0016829 GO:0030170 GO:0046656
170.060.1715.910.030.241u3iA GO:0004364 GO:0016740
180.060.1665.720.060.233dbjA GO:0015979 GO:0018298 GO:0030089 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005524 GO:0043295 GO:0000287 GO:0042803 GO:0004363 GO:0016597
GO-Score 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.47
Biological Processes GO:0006750 GO:0006950 GO:0010243 GO:0010038 GO:0034097 GO:0001101 GO:0019752 GO:0009991 GO:0048731 GO:1901700 GO:0044238
GO-Score 0.49 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.41
Cellular Component GO:1903561 GO:0031988 GO:0044444
GO-Score 0.47 0.47 0.47

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.