[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2390c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.11 6 3ov4B EQU Rep, Mult 75,79,109,147,149,151,162,166,182
20.07 4 4fcmA III Rep, Mult 66,67,70,71,74,96,97,175,176,177,178
30.04 2 2fhyA A37 Rep, Mult 99,100
40.04 2 2yr2B ZN Rep, Mult 83,85
50.04 2 1gy60 III Rep, Mult 101,130,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,142,144,165,167,169,171,181,182,183
60.04 2 3hx8D IMD Rep, Mult 73,128,143,166,168,179
70.02 1 3ov4A EQU Rep, Mult 75,79,124,149,151
80.02 1 4akyA 4LL Rep, Mult 79,82,106,109,113,149,164,184
90.02 1 1jn5B III Rep, Mult 136,137,138,139,140,141,170,171,172,177
100.02 1 2axtl UNK Rep, Mult 42,45
110.02 1 3ujmA EPE Rep, Mult 96,175,177,178
120.02 1 3k7tA GP7 Rep, Mult 23,24
130.02 1 2byoA ZN Rep, Mult 125,148
140.02 1 3a52A MG Rep, Mult 127,129
150.02 1 3m4gC ZN Rep, Mult 180,181
160.02 1 1hkxA TBR Rep, Mult 61,64,133,134,135

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0663e99A0.5022.930.0780.6161.14.12.10NA
20.0664stdA0.5262.770.0920.6434.2.1.94125
30.0603gzxB0.5703.000.0750.7191.14.12.18146
40.0601g72A0.4234.370.0670.6271.1.99.8NA
50.0601gpeB0.4275.830.0640.7841.1.3.472,74
60.0601o7hB0.5733.420.0510.7351.14.12.1295
70.0602h1nA0.4285.770.0450.7733.4.24.-NA
80.0601wmwA0.4234.660.0480.6652.5.1.-NA
90.0601galA0.3855.740.0640.7081.1.3.448
100.0602v7oA0.3585.600.0500.6272.7.11.1785
110.0601rsrB0.4593.660.0560.6221.17.4.1NA
120.0601cf3A0.4245.990.0690.8001.1.3.4NA
130.0601hkxA0.5293.370.0960.6702.7.11.17NA
140.0602ux0A0.5373.100.1130.6592.7.11.17100,178
150.0601lrwC0.4254.230.0750.6221.1.99.896
160.0601uzrB0.4443.960.0560.6321.17.4.1106
170.0601e3vB0.4552.720.0480.5515.3.3.175,106
180.0608choA0.4552.490.0590.5405.3.3.176
190.0603en1B0.5483.030.0470.6861.14.12.3,1.14.12.1170,86,129
200.0601buqA0.4592.400.0590.5465.3.3.175
210.0601biqB0.4583.660.0640.6221.17.4.1NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.200.5472.410.120.644akzA GO:0005886 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030255 GO:0042802
10.160.4602.500.110.554ec6A GO:0016020 GO:0016021
20.130.5402.470.140.634lsoA GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030255
30.120.5552.510.080.654o3vB GO:0016020 GO:0016021
40.120.5612.860.090.701wqlB GO:0003824 GO:0006725 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
50.110.5442.650.110.644nhfA GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030255
60.110.5452.500.110.644jf8A GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030255
70.100.5262.990.110.662ckfB GO:0003824 GO:0006725 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
80.100.5413.010.070.681uliD GO:0003824 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0018687 GO:0019439 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
90.090.5463.270.040.692cw9A GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005759 GO:0006626 GO:0006810 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0030150 GO:0051087
100.070.5342.410.130.634meiA GO:0016020 GO:0030255
110.070.5622.460.120.652cc3A GO:0005886 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030255 GO:0042802 GO:0043684
120.070.5753.560.040.742fxtA GO:0000166 GO:0001405 GO:0005524 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0006626 GO:0006810 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0030150 GO:0030674 GO:0051087
130.070.5703.000.070.723gzxB GO:0003824 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0018687 GO:0019439 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
140.070.5703.340.070.732bmoB GO:0003824 GO:0006725 GO:0055114
150.070.5723.430.050.741eg9B GO:0003824 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0018625 GO:0019439 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
160.070.5663.990.070.784rzmB GO:0016853 GO:0017000
170.070.5483.030.050.693en1B GO:0003824 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0018619 GO:0018624 GO:0019439 GO:0042184 GO:0042203 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
180.070.5332.670.100.642b1xB GO:0003824 GO:0006725 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
190.070.5323.230.080.675aewF GO:0003824 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0018687 GO:0019439 GO:0051213 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005515
GO-Score 0.41
Biological Processes GO:0009405 GO:0030255
GO-Score 0.31 0.31
Cellular Component GO:0016021 GO:0005886
GO-Score 0.49 0.31

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.