[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2345

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.06 2 3cmvB ANP Rep, Mult 283,285,286,287,288,325
20.06 2 3j001 PEV Rep, Mult 298,308,311,312
30.06 2 4ecgA CA Rep, Mult 138,140
40.03 1 1g3uA MG Rep, Mult 38,237
50.03 1 2np5A NDS Rep, Mult 373,376
60.03 1 3v2d2 MG Rep, Mult 407,411
70.03 1 1vdfB CL Rep, Mult 303,306
80.03 1 5lcwO III Rep, Mult 105,109,129,132,133,151,157,172,176,183,212,216,219,247,250,251,254,258,284,288,292,295,326,330,333,334,368,445
90.03 1 3cmvG ANP Rep, Mult 249,250,251,252,253,254,255
100.03 1 3cmvH ANP Rep, Mult 261,262,266,267,268
110.03 1 3cmvE ANP Rep, Mult 246,248,249,250,290
120.03 1 1hz40 III Rep, Mult 275,277,278,309,312,317
130.03 1 3qfyB BGC Rep, Mult 234,238,243,244
140.03 1 1qghA FE Rep, Mult 276,280
150.03 1 3pyoY MG Rep, Mult 396,440

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601ug9A0.3277.540.0540.5113.2.1.70NA
20.0601hn0A0.3107.870.0510.4954.2.2.20298
30.0602qf7A0.3328.190.0430.5486.4.1.1NA
40.0602pziA0.3117.860.0420.4982.7.11.1325
50.0603gtgB0.3248.260.0490.5352.7.7.6NA
60.0603iydC0.3348.130.0340.5452.7.7.6NA
70.0601kktA0.3115.550.0570.4083.2.1.113NA
80.0602vumB0.2968.340.0340.4912.7.7.6NA
90.0601kc7A0.3247.720.0430.5062.7.9.1NA
100.0602zxqA0.3107.950.0350.4973.2.1.97260
110.0603btaA0.3458.350.0460.5833.4.24.69NA
120.0602ipyA0.2818.370.0280.4714.2.1.3NA
130.0601kblA0.3207.620.0390.4972.7.9.1NA
140.0602uv8G0.3228.410.0560.5422.3.1.86NA
150.0601h54B0.3217.050.0770.4732.4.1.8NA
160.0601w3bB0.3604.500.0790.4392.4.1.-282,316
170.0603ebgA0.3156.970.0250.4563.4.11.-NA
180.0602wyhA0.3087.790.0320.4853.2.1.24228,233
190.0601vbgA0.3088.100.0470.5012.7.9.1NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.280.8522.950.070.925g05O GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005680 GO:0005829 GO:0007049 GO:0007067 GO:0016567 GO:0019903 GO:0031145 GO:0042787 GO:0043161 GO:0051301 GO:0051436 GO:0051437 GO:0051439 GO:0070979
10.110.5145.300.070.664uzyA GO:0005929 GO:0030992 GO:0031514 GO:0042073 GO:0042384
20.070.5395.270.060.685c6gA GO:0000790 GO:0006302 GO:0007064 GO:0007076 GO:0032116 GO:0070550 GO:0071169
30.070.5375.560.040.704xdnA GO:0000790 GO:0005634 GO:0006302 GO:0007049 GO:0007059 GO:0007064 GO:0007067 GO:0007076 GO:0032116 GO:0051301 GO:0070550 GO:0071169
40.060.4276.280.040.584bujB GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0034427 GO:0051607 GO:0055087 GO:0070478 GO:0070481
50.060.3366.910.050.484kvmB GO:0004596 GO:0005737 GO:0010698 GO:0016740 GO:0017196 GO:0031415 GO:0031416 GO:0043085 GO:1902391
60.060.2347.780.020.375a9yA GO:0000166 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005829 GO:0009408 GO:0009409
70.060.2543.040.110.282pl2A
80.060.2284.500.070.274houA GO:0002376 GO:0003723 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0009615 GO:0016032 GO:0019060 GO:0032091 GO:0043657 GO:0045070 GO:0045071 GO:0045087 GO:0050688 GO:0050689 GO:0051097 GO:0051607 GO:0060337 GO:0071357 GO:0071360
90.060.1767.910.030.281xl7B GO:0005102 GO:0005739 GO:0005777 GO:0006091 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0006810 GO:0008458 GO:0009437 GO:0010243 GO:0015908 GO:0015936 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0042493 GO:0043231 GO:0051791
100.060.1746.780.060.255iz3A GO:0005975 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0042132 GO:0042578
110.060.1757.030.020.263j6b1 GO:0003735 GO:0005739 GO:0005762 GO:0005840 GO:0030529 GO:0032543
120.060.1882.910.070.212fo7A
130.060.1836.430.060.263vylA GO:0046872
140.060.1702.540.090.182xevB GO:0046872 GO:0070206
150.060.1775.750.050.234k92A GO:0000086 GO:0000226 GO:0000775 GO:0000776 GO:0000777 GO:0001578 GO:0002162 GO:0005694 GO:0005737 GO:0005794 GO:0005813 GO:0005815 GO:0005819 GO:0005828 GO:0005829 GO:0005856 GO:0005874 GO:0005876 GO:0005881 GO:0005925 GO:0005938 GO:0006903 GO:0007020 GO:0007026 GO:0007030 GO:0007049 GO:0007052 GO:0007062 GO:0007067 GO:0007163 GO:0008017 GO:0010458 GO:0010470 GO:0010634 GO:0010717 GO:0016020 GO:0030953 GO:0030981 GO:0031023 GO:0031111 GO:0031116 GO:0031592 GO:0034453 GO:0035371 GO:0040001 GO:0043515 GO:0045180 GO:0045921 GO:0051010 GO:0051294 GO:0051301 GO:0051497 GO:0051893 GO:0070062 GO:0070507 GO:0090091 GO:0090162 GO:0090307 GO:1903690 GO:1904261
160.060.1986.950.040.293qluB GO:0004872 GO:0004970 GO:0005216 GO:0005234 GO:0005783 GO:0005886 GO:0006621 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007268 GO:0008066 GO:0008328 GO:0014069 GO:0015277 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0017124 GO:0030054 GO:0030165 GO:0030424 GO:0030425 GO:0031630 GO:0032983 GO:0034220 GO:0035235 GO:0035249 GO:0042391 GO:0042734 GO:0042802 GO:0043005 GO:0043025 GO:0043113 GO:0043195 GO:0043204 GO:0043525 GO:0045202 GO:0045211 GO:0051649 GO:0060079 GO:0071333
170.060.1915.740.070.253qxlA GO:0005085 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0007264 GO:0008321 GO:0016020 GO:0032485 GO:0035556 GO:0043547
180.060.1816.220.070.252jc4A GO:0003677 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0005622 GO:0006281 GO:0008853 GO:0016787 GO:0090305


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0019902
GO-Score 0.56
Biological Processes GO:1901990 GO:1904668 GO:0000209 GO:0010498 GO:2000060 GO:0051439 GO:1904667 GO:0051301 GO:0007067
GO-Score 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.33 0.33
Cellular Component GO:0031981 GO:0000152 GO:0031461 GO:0044444
GO-Score 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.