[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2315c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 5 1opoB CA Rep, Mult 325,326
20.05 2 1vpb0 III Rep, Mult 41,47,55,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,77,78,79,80,81,82,91,95,98,99,101,102,103,136,137
30.04 2 2z2pA MHT Rep, Mult 326,360
40.04 2 2z6iB CA Rep, Mult 95,98
50.02 1 4uzgA CA Rep, Mult 379,380
60.02 1 3fahA GOL Rep, Mult 352,356,357,359,361
70.02 1 4p9pC 2CV Rep, Mult 261,263
80.02 1 1c41A LMZ Rep, Mult 341,342
90.02 1 1uwcA FER Rep, Mult 373,379
100.02 1 1sijA FES Rep, Mult 331,332,333,362,363,377,379
110.02 1 1q0kE THJ Rep, Mult 16,19
120.02 1 1p8nA MN Rep, Mult 267,312,325
130.02 1 3ak1B EDO Rep, Mult 23,24,27
140.02 1 2hdnA GDP Rep, Mult 418,446,447,448,449
150.02 1 2qt6A CA Rep, Mult 258,261
160.02 1 1vs0A MG Rep, Mult 275,277
170.02 1 3e6sA FE Rep, Mult 268,420
180.02 1 3zukA ZN Rep, Mult 267,272,377

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602e1qA0.3527.960.0500.6121.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
20.0601ultA0.3317.380.0680.5376.2.1.3NA
30.0603fccA0.3147.390.0290.5136.1.1.13NA
40.0601vlbA0.3297.810.0460.5561.2.99.7NA
50.0602hb6A0.3057.600.0640.5193.4.11.1312
60.0603ecqB0.3267.740.0340.5563.2.1.97NA
70.0602hb6B0.3137.370.0480.5133.4.11.1NA
80.0602fugU0.3207.240.0510.5111.6.99.5254
90.0602pflA0.3267.910.0410.5562.3.1.54NA
100.0601mswD0.2937.540.0400.4812.7.7.6NA
110.0601dgjA0.3528.010.0410.6121.2.-.-NA
120.0601eulA0.2657.800.0390.4553.6.3.8NA
130.0601ob2A0.2017.510.0300.3353.6.1.48NA
140.0601amuA0.3197.590.0360.5275.1.1.11NA
150.0601bgxT0.3547.120.0710.5602.7.7.7NA
160.0602dkiA0.3147.220.0450.4991.14.13.23254,428,443
170.0601etuA0.1485.710.0400.2083.6.5.3NA
180.0601s76D0.3287.860.0470.5702.7.7.6NA
190.0603la4A0.3227.730.0460.5433.5.1.5443

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.350.8471.160.170.861vpbA GO:0006508 GO:0008237
10.280.7822.340.150.841vl4A GO:0006508 GO:0008237
20.280.8072.120.150.863tv9A GO:0006508 GO:0008237
30.270.8321.800.150.873qtdA GO:0006508 GO:0008237
40.060.2616.810.030.392j5cB GO:0000287 GO:0008152 GO:0010333 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
50.060.2726.780.070.421e3eA GO:0001523 GO:0003960 GO:0004022 GO:0004024 GO:0004032 GO:0004745 GO:0005503 GO:0005737 GO:0006066 GO:0006067 GO:0006069 GO:0006081 GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0019115 GO:0019841 GO:0035276 GO:0042572 GO:0046164 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:1901661
60.060.2436.520.010.361xfuA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004016 GO:0005516 GO:0005524 GO:0005576 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006171 GO:0006508 GO:0008237 GO:0008294 GO:0009405 GO:0010008 GO:0016829 GO:0046872 GO:0052007
70.060.2446.660.030.371sk6B GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004016 GO:0005516 GO:0005524 GO:0005576 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006171 GO:0006508 GO:0008237 GO:0008294 GO:0009405 GO:0010008 GO:0016829 GO:0046872 GO:0052007
80.060.2477.940.030.412ykkA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0006080 GO:0016985 GO:0030246 GO:0030248 GO:0046872
90.060.2157.020.040.334gzbA GO:0008800 GO:0016787 GO:0017001 GO:0030288 GO:0033252 GO:0042597 GO:0046677
100.060.2707.010.040.423cosD GO:0001523 GO:0003960 GO:0004022 GO:0004024 GO:0004032 GO:0004745 GO:0005503 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006066 GO:0006067 GO:0006069 GO:0006081 GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0019115 GO:0019841 GO:0035276 GO:0042572 GO:0046164 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:1901661
110.060.2436.670.040.371sk6C GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004016 GO:0005516 GO:0005524 GO:0005576 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006171 GO:0006508 GO:0008237 GO:0008294 GO:0009405 GO:0010008 GO:0016829 GO:0046872 GO:0052007
120.060.1825.970.020.264xvwA GO:0005623 GO:0045454
130.060.2037.270.030.332bgsA GO:0004032 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
140.060.1695.460.030.233lktM GO:0003824 GO:0005506 GO:0006725 GO:0008199 GO:0016491 GO:0016702 GO:0018578 GO:0019439 GO:0019619 GO:0042952 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
150.060.1816.210.040.263iqeA GO:0006730 GO:0008901 GO:0015948 GO:0016491 GO:0019386 GO:0030268 GO:0055114
160.060.1966.590.020.301lrtA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0003938 GO:0005737 GO:0006164 GO:0006177 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
170.060.1706.370.050.254wiqA GO:0002011 GO:0002162 GO:0003779 GO:0005509 GO:0005576 GO:0005604 GO:0005615 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005856 GO:0005886 GO:0005911 GO:0005913 GO:0005925 GO:0006509 GO:0006607 GO:0007016 GO:0008307 GO:0009279 GO:0010470 GO:0010717 GO:0014044 GO:0015631 GO:0016010 GO:0016011 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0016323 GO:0016340 GO:0017166 GO:0019048 GO:0021682 GO:0022011 GO:0030027 GO:0030054 GO:0030175 GO:0030336 GO:0032403 GO:0033268 GO:0034453 GO:0042169 GO:0042383 GO:0043034 GO:0043409 GO:0043434 GO:0045121 GO:0045202 GO:0045211 GO:0051393 GO:0051898 GO:0060441 GO:0060445 GO:0070062 GO:0070938 GO:0071679 GO:0071711 GO:1904261
180.060.1715.590.060.244za6A GO:0003677


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0008237
GO-Score 0.76
Biological Processes GO:0006508
GO-Score 0.76
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.