[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2309A

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.35 6 5hc9B MG Rep, Mult 7,9,73,75
20.06 1 1lamA CO3 Rep, Mult 29,30,32,33,53
30.06 1 3aodA MIY Rep, Mult 59,62,64
40.06 1 2ddsB CO Rep, Mult 11,42

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601t3qB0.4953.990.0910.8321.3.99.17NA
20.0601s9rA0.4783.960.0840.7793.5.3.631
30.0601jrpB0.4793.890.0550.8211.17.1.431,39,44
40.0601jawA0.4974.320.0450.8533.4.11.9NA
50.0602rfbA0.4814.060.0320.7891.14.14.1NA
60.0602a9gD0.4834.120.0540.7893.5.3.64
70.0601spiA0.4094.300.0660.8213.1.3.11NA
80.0601wn1A0.4764.120.0450.8213.4.-.-NA
90.0601pv9B0.4504.270.0460.8003.4.13.9NA
100.0601wy2A0.4744.280.0450.8423.4.13.9NA
110.0602b3lA0.4954.160.0460.8743.4.11.1817
120.0603ctzA0.4903.970.0650.8843.4.11.9NA
130.0603ejbH0.4934.120.0330.8001.14.-.-NA
140.06011asA0.4794.010.1330.8426.3.1.166
150.06012asA0.4764.020.1330.8426.3.1.180
160.0601kp0A0.4834.350.0670.8533.5.3.3NA
170.0601chmA0.4864.370.0800.8533.5.3.3NA
180.0602oknA0.4954.300.0450.8633.4.13.982,88,90
190.0601o0xA0.5004.190.0340.8843.4.11.18NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.5693.240.050.883ronB GO:0005576 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
10.070.5043.680.080.851pp0B GO:0005576 GO:0009405
20.070.5213.750.080.871cbyA GO:0005576 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
30.070.4234.580.010.794b2td GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005815 GO:0005832 GO:0005856 GO:0005929 GO:0006457 GO:0042470 GO:0042995 GO:0051082
40.070.4094.430.120.785da8L GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006457 GO:0042026 GO:0051082
50.070.5273.600.040.892rciA GO:0005576 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
60.070.4224.690.040.804b2tG GO:0000166 GO:0002199 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005832 GO:0005874 GO:0005886 GO:0006457 GO:0007339 GO:0043209 GO:0044297 GO:0044822 GO:0046931 GO:0051082 GO:0070062 GO:1901998
70.070.4453.930.050.744xciB GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0006457 GO:0051082
80.070.4444.430.020.813iygD GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005815 GO:0005832 GO:0005856 GO:0005929 GO:0006457 GO:0042470 GO:0042995 GO:0051082
90.070.4074.730.090.794a0oM GO:0000166 GO:0002199 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005832 GO:0005874 GO:0006457 GO:0007339 GO:0031625 GO:0043209 GO:0044297 GO:0051082 GO:0051131 GO:0070062 GO:1901998
100.070.4484.530.050.823aq1B GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0006457 GO:0051082
110.070.5084.290.120.881a6dB GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0006457 GO:0051082
120.070.4314.520.070.781iokA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006457 GO:0042026 GO:0051082
130.060.5074.340.080.874b2tq GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005815 GO:0005832 GO:0005856 GO:0005929 GO:0006457 GO:0042995 GO:0051082
140.060.4884.330.050.873losA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0006457 GO:0051082
150.060.5024.630.060.934v94E GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005832 GO:0006457 GO:0051082
160.060.4304.660.030.804v81C GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005832 GO:0006457 GO:0051082
170.060.4083.480.060.663c5iD GO:0046872
180.060.4144.640.100.775da8M GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006457 GO:0042026 GO:0051082


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005524 GO:0051082
GO-Score 0.13 0.13
Biological Processes GO:0051704
GO-Score 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0005576 GO:0005832 GO:0005929 GO:0042470 GO:0005815
GO-Score 0.18 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.