[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2256c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 5 2hrfA CU1 Rep, Mult 27,31,32,104
20.08 4 2xkpA AKG Rep, Mult 141,144
30.06 3 1fbmA RTL Rep, Mult 134,141,144
40.04 2 1dxoA DQN Rep, Mult 84,111
50.02 1 3zcbB ATP Rep, Mult 149,150
60.02 1 2wgrA POP Rep, Mult 86,87,105,116,117,118,119
70.02 1 3nkqA NKQ Rep, Mult 34,37
80.02 1 4aahC CA Rep, Mult 36,121,154
90.02 1 1v72A ZN Rep, Mult 158,162
100.02 1 2hrnA CU1 Rep, Mult 32,36,106
110.02 1 3lsmA SO3 Rep, Mult 174,177
120.02 1 3nz4A TCA Rep, Mult 54,62
130.02 1 3n92A BGC Rep, Mult 84,85,97,98
140.02 1 3se1A MG Rep, Mult 143,146
150.02 1 1kb0A CA Rep, Mult 36,120,154,163

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602i3yA0.4634.610.1040.7231.11.1.9NA
20.0602zidA0.4874.890.0460.8023.2.1.7051
30.0602wgrA0.4863.880.0820.6781.11.1.9NA
40.0602ze0A0.4874.820.0660.8023.2.1.20NA
50.0601ygpA0.4865.090.0510.7742.4.1.135
60.0602z9sJ0.4974.200.0610.7231.11.1.1531,33,104,120,125
70.0601prxA0.5084.350.0440.7511.11.1.7,1.11.1.15NA
80.0602azdB0.4824.970.0640.7682.4.1.1NA
90.0603a5wB0.4914.340.0520.7291.11.1.1531
100.0601zjaA0.4904.800.0480.8025.4.99.11NA
110.0601e1yA0.4884.790.0630.7802.4.1.1NA
120.0602c4mC0.4805.040.0570.7682.4.1.1NA
130.0603cynC0.4934.410.0820.7511.11.1.9NA
140.0601ea9C0.4824.800.0490.7913.2.1.54NA
150.0602wkgA0.4784.740.0660.7743.2.1.54NA
160.0601qmvA0.4924.300.0680.7231.11.1.1531
170.0602f8aA0.4784.380.0670.7181.11.1.9NA
180.0601zyeK0.4913.940.0790.7011.11.1.1533,118,126
190.0602d0gA0.4834.950.0400.7973.2.1.13542

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.120.5023.980.100.721we0A GO:0006979 GO:0016209 GO:0016491 GO:0051920 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
10.080.4374.280.060.661on4A GO:0005886 GO:0016020 GO:0046872
20.070.6113.650.090.822b7jB GO:0005507 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0006461 GO:0006825 GO:0006878 GO:0008379 GO:0008535 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046872 GO:0051775 GO:0098869
30.070.5543.610.050.752gqkA GO:0005507 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0006091 GO:0006825 GO:0006878 GO:0008535 GO:0030016 GO:0046872 GO:0072492
40.070.5393.760.130.733me7A GO:0016020 GO:0016021
50.070.5324.120.110.772rliA GO:0001654 GO:0001701 GO:0003012 GO:0005507 GO:0005654 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005759 GO:0006825 GO:0006878 GO:0008535 GO:0014823 GO:0022904 GO:0030016 GO:0046872 GO:0055070 GO:0055114
60.070.5333.670.060.734hdeA GO:0005524
70.070.5433.780.130.752k6vA
80.070.5083.590.070.682l5oA GO:0016491 GO:0055114
90.070.5153.690.130.712ywoA GO:0016209 GO:0016491 GO:0016853 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
100.070.4984.100.090.723ztlB GO:0004601 GO:0016209 GO:0016491 GO:0051920 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
110.070.4773.650.090.653ia1A GO:0016209 GO:0016491 GO:0016853 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
120.070.4783.700.080.673kcmD GO:0005623 GO:0016209 GO:0016491 GO:0045454 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
130.070.5023.950.060.734txoD GO:0016020 GO:0016021
140.070.4774.120.090.693ixrA GO:0016209 GO:0016491 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
150.070.4693.730.090.653hdcA GO:0005623 GO:0016209 GO:0016491 GO:0045454 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
160.070.4673.870.070.641o73A GO:0005623 GO:0045454 GO:0055114
170.060.4054.800.080.653tztA GO:0016740 GO:0016757
180.060.3624.910.040.591nl3A GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006605 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0015031 GO:0015462 GO:0016020 GO:0016887 GO:0017038 GO:0031522 GO:0040007 GO:0043952 GO:0052059 GO:0065002


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0043169
GO-Score 0.40
Biological Processes GO:1990748
GO-Score 0.35
Cellular Component GO:0005743 GO:0016021 GO:0005886 GO:0030016 GO:0072492
GO-Score 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.