[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2199c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 3 5a43A F Rep, Mult 45,49,118
20.08 3 5a41C F Rep, Mult 42,45,91,110,114
30.05 2 2npjA IMD Rep, Mult 43,46,47,117
40.05 2 3g61B 0JZ Rep, Mult 15,48,52
50.05 2 1rsrB UUU Rep, Mult 51,55,78,81
60.02 1 2wsc4 CLA Rep, Mult 127,131
70.02 1 2nr9A PA6 Rep, Mult 63,86
80.02 1 4ag5C MG Rep, Mult 77,81
90.02 1 1biqB UUU Rep, Mult 91,95,98
100.02 1 1cc1L SF4 Rep, Mult 6,139
110.02 1 3r4iB CA Rep, Mult 35,69
120.02 1 2q69A CA Rep, Mult 74,75,80
130.02 1 3kp9A U10 Rep, Mult 51,54,58,61,125
140.02 1 2o01G CLA Rep, Mult 62,92
150.02 1 3kj2A ZN Rep, Mult 68,69

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601mo7A0.2974.950.0520.5183.6.3.9NA
20.0603b9jC0.4904.450.0410.7771.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
30.0601fo4A0.4254.950.1060.7271.17.1.4NA
40.0601fziA0.5034.660.0560.8421.14.13.25NA
50.0601qhaA0.5033.780.0520.7552.7.1.1NA
60.0603b9jI0.2785.070.0370.4751.17.1.4,1.17.3.278
70.0603g61A0.5403.530.0430.7703.6.3.4444,51
80.0601jrpB0.4774.870.0480.7841.17.1.4NA
90.0603btaA0.5014.480.0380.8853.4.24.69NA
100.0601biqB0.5454.450.0440.9061.17.4.1NA
110.0602e1qA0.4424.760.0580.7051.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
120.0601ksdA0.4754.520.0750.7843.2.1.4NA
130.0602vuaA0.3514.810.0370.6193.4.24.69113
140.0601mhyD0.4964.580.0710.8351.14.13.25NA
150.0602dh4A0.4904.500.0310.8132.5.1.296
160.0602f8zF0.4984.100.0600.7552.5.1.10,2.5.1.1NA
170.0601eulA0.4844.170.1040.7553.6.3.8NA
180.0602nztA0.4224.370.0670.6622.7.1.1NA
190.0602np0A0.4984.660.0560.8353.4.24.6935

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.190.5474.140.050.884dr0B GO:0004748 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
10.070.5743.510.080.785aexA GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0007124 GO:0008519 GO:0015695 GO:0015696 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0019740 GO:0072488
20.070.5553.540.040.762nuuD GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0008519 GO:0015292 GO:0015670 GO:0015695 GO:0015696 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0019740 GO:0072488
30.070.5284.320.090.862bq1I GO:0004748 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
40.070.5593.450.080.754nv2A GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0048038 GO:0055114
50.070.4974.490.060.814djnA GO:0001822 GO:0003014 GO:0004748 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0006264 GO:0006281 GO:0006974 GO:0006979 GO:0009186 GO:0009200 GO:0009263 GO:0014075 GO:0015949 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070062 GO:1902254
60.070.5753.520.060.785aezA GO:0001402 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006995 GO:0008519 GO:0009267 GO:0015696 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030447 GO:0036170 GO:0072488
70.070.5094.420.060.854n83A GO:0004748 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
80.070.4584.900.120.835f1jA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
90.070.5194.210.090.831uzrB GO:0004748 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0040007 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
100.070.4424.670.060.733c1gA GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0008519 GO:0015292 GO:0015670 GO:0015695 GO:0015696 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0019740 GO:0072488
110.070.4884.290.050.811h0nA GO:0004748 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009262 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0051259 GO:0051290 GO:0055114
120.070.5254.280.050.861oquC GO:0004748 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
130.070.4604.540.050.762b2fA GO:0006810 GO:0008519 GO:0015696 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0072488
140.070.5504.250.070.884bmqA GO:0004748 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
150.070.4385.080.060.801jk0A GO:0004748 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
160.070.5464.300.070.895cnvH GO:0004748 GO:0005506 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0015949 GO:0016491 GO:0042802 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
170.070.4834.230.050.762vuxB GO:0001822 GO:0003014 GO:0004748 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0006264 GO:0006281 GO:0006974 GO:0006979 GO:0009186 GO:0009200 GO:0009263 GO:0014075 GO:0015949 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070062 GO:1902254
180.070.5294.310.070.864m1fA GO:0004748 GO:0005506 GO:0005737 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0043169 GO:0061731
GO-Score 0.50 0.50
Biological Processes GO:0009132 GO:0009165 GO:0006259 GO:1901137 GO:0034645 GO:0009262
GO-Score 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Cellular Component GO:1990204 GO:0044445
GO-Score 0.50 0.50

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.