[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2086

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.07 4 4rkuL CLA Rep, Mult 58,62
20.07 4 3jcuL CLA Rep, Mult 62,66
30.06 3 1jt0C QNA Rep, Mult 20,21,41,49,50
40.06 3 4qvpK MG Rep, Mult 101,105
50.04 2 1jt0A QNA Rep, Mult 24,38,41,49,50
60.04 2 3fhzC ARG Rep, Mult 153,156,157,160,169,171
70.02 1 1shkA MG Rep, Mult 106,107,109
80.02 1 1jt0D QNA Rep, Mult 10,11,25,50,55
90.02 1 5fmiA ZN Rep, Mult 67,71
100.02 1 1i9dA SO3 Rep, Mult 133,169
110.02 1 4ej7A CA Rep, Mult 143,160
120.02 1 1yzxA GSF Rep, Mult 16,176
130.02 1 3ke6B MN Rep, Mult 160,166,168
140.02 1 2icpA MG Rep, Mult 35,36,39
150.02 1 1sl0A MG Rep, Mult 13,100

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603gpbA0.4525.290.0490.7462.4.1.184
20.0602zf5Y0.4665.150.0490.7462.7.1.3039
30.0601e1yA0.4465.620.0220.7912.4.1.1NA
40.0601cwyA0.4365.330.0620.7212.4.1.25NA
50.0601cygA0.4355.780.0590.7862.4.1.19NA
60.0603ezwG0.4445.450.0620.7462.7.1.30154,156
70.0601cevA0.4415.370.0480.7213.5.3.1NA
80.0602je8B0.4455.990.0710.8313.2.1.25NA
90.0602qllA0.4385.720.0710.7812.4.1.1NA
100.0602olsA0.4375.420.0580.7312.7.9.2NA
110.0601oqzB0.4525.130.0370.7263.5.1.9382,88,159
120.0601bglA0.3645.950.0230.6723.2.1.23NA
130.0602i7pB0.4495.220.0690.7362.7.1.3359
140.0603ig5A0.4405.240.0400.7366.3.2.2123
150.0602qaeA0.4355.910.0650.7661.8.1.49
160.0601bvnP0.4585.490.0800.7963.2.1.155
170.0603l76A0.4645.730.0320.8162.7.2.451
180.0601bsiA0.4545.770.0690.8113.2.1.1NA
190.0603hxxA0.4595.700.1010.8266.1.1.7NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.160.5524.030.050.782zozB GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
10.150.5344.490.050.784ichA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
20.070.5234.870.070.803vibC GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
30.070.5204.940.090.833pasB GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
40.070.5354.560.090.811t33A GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
50.070.5274.900.090.814jykA GO:0000976 GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005829 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892 GO:0045893
60.070.5094.870.060.792g3bA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
70.070.5114.680.070.752o7tA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
80.070.4925.120.080.793vprA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0042802
90.070.5134.500.090.753on4A GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
100.070.5204.670.070.792hyjA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
110.070.5304.730.080.792id6A GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
120.070.5065.010.050.813lhqA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
130.070.4995.270.080.813bcgA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0008144 GO:0042493 GO:0043565 GO:0045892
140.070.4974.860.060.764nn1A GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
150.070.4745.370.070.793bqyA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892 GO:0046677
160.070.4874.670.090.744aciB GO:0000287 GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0046872
170.070.4935.030.090.774gctC GO:0000976 GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006355 GO:0007049 GO:0009295 GO:0010974 GO:0043565 GO:0043590 GO:0051301 GO:0051302
180.070.4865.050.090.775f1jA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003677
GO-Score 0.42
Biological Processes GO:0006355
GO-Score 0.42
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.