[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2081c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 5 4z90F 4LE Rep, Mult 69,72
20.05 3 4f8hB LMD Rep, Mult 69,70,73
30.04 2 2gwnA ZN Rep, Mult 62,96,130
40.04 2 4z10C RCO Rep, Mult 75,76
50.04 2 1woqB PO4 Rep, Mult 40,41,144,145
60.02 1 3k89A GOL Rep, Mult 103,104,105
70.02 1 2vc2B 180 Rep, Mult 49,50,51,133,134,135,136
80.02 1 2wse1 CLA Rep, Mult 32,40
90.02 1 3sbmA ACT Rep, Mult 37,41,47,48
100.02 1 2o011 CLA Rep, Mult 134,135
110.02 1 1esoA ZN Rep, Mult 107,119,130,135
120.02 1 1rmgA MAN Rep, Mult 120,121
130.02 1 1ybqA ZN Rep, Mult 96,119
140.02 1 3mjlB 2AI Rep, Mult 96,107
150.02 1 2nqaA III Rep, Mult 79,80,81
160.02 1 1l5gB UUU Rep, Mult 10,12,14,58,60
170.02 1 3sqgD M43 Rep, Mult 10,11,12,13,109,112
180.02 1 2qo3B CER Rep, Mult 53,127,131
190.02 1 1l5gB III Rep, Mult 54,55,56,58,60

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601e6vA0.4155.150.0630.7742.8.4.1NA
20.0603lw6A0.4164.710.0900.7192.4.1.133NA
30.0603g87A0.4364.690.0650.7812.3.1.39NA
40.0602vkzG0.4724.980.0660.8492.3.1.38,3.1.2.14NA
50.0601djgB0.4005.300.0760.7473.1.4.11NA
60.0602c2nA0.4484.950.0920.8152.3.1.39NA
70.0603ezoA0.4124.780.0940.7192.3.1.39NA
80.0602qj3B0.4674.720.0940.8152.3.1.39NA
90.0602vz8A0.4684.370.1170.7532.3.1.8562
100.0602g9xC0.3964.760.0680.6642.7.11.22,2.7.1.37NA
110.0602jfdA0.3745.620.0670.7532.3.1.85130,131
120.0603exeA0.3705.620.0760.7401.2.4.1NA
130.0602pffB0.4815.040.0720.8772.3.1.8650,94
140.0601cjyA0.4195.160.0540.7743.1.1.4,3.1.1.5NA
150.0602vz9B0.4704.340.1170.7532.3.1.85NA
160.0602h1yB0.4604.730.0790.8012.3.1.39NA
170.0601fhvA0.4154.980.0460.7124.2.1.113NA
180.0603jrqA0.4094.430.0560.6373.1.3.1652,54
190.0601zefA0.4185.060.0480.7263.1.3.1NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.6343.170.200.854opeA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016874 GO:0031177
10.070.6053.630.180.864tktA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0031177
20.070.5953.740.130.845elpC GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0031177
30.070.6133.780.140.882qo3B GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0017000 GO:0031177 GO:0033068 GO:0047879 GO:0048037 GO:0055114
40.070.6033.730.140.864na1A GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016874 GO:0017000 GO:0031177
50.070.6023.770.120.874z37A GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0031177
60.070.5804.020.140.864qyrA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0031177
70.070.5943.800.130.854kc5A GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0031177
80.070.5964.090.110.905erbB GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0031177
90.070.5913.800.100.864wkyA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0031177
100.070.5644.100.130.854zdnA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0031177
110.070.5664.000.080.854mz0B GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0031177 GO:0046872
120.070.5833.820.130.845e5nB GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0017000 GO:0031177 GO:0055114
130.070.5803.820.130.845e5nC GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0017000 GO:0031177 GO:0055114
140.070.5623.170.120.775elpA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0031177
150.060.3845.080.060.703lrfA GO:0003824 GO:0004315 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
160.060.3915.180.070.714b7vA GO:0003824 GO:0006633 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747 GO:0033817
170.060.3925.200.070.714qavA GO:0003824 GO:0006633 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747 GO:0033817
180.060.3914.970.060.694ls8A GO:0003824 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747 GO:0033817


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0019842 GO:0033218 GO:0072341
GO-Score 0.59 0.59 0.59
Biological Processes GO:0055114 GO:0033068
GO-Score 0.07 0.07
Cellular Component GO:0005737
GO-Score 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.