[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2075c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.46 24 4gnkD CA Rep, Mult 123,124,158,160,222
20.07 5 1djyA I2P Rep, Mult 123,124,158,160,179,222,286,326,353
30.01 1 3ea1A ZN Rep, Mult 152,397
40.01 1 4i9jA XP5 Rep, Mult 130,131,137,140,363,365,394
50.01 1 1v3mB GAL Rep, Mult 160,196,199
60.01 1 1djgA LA Rep, Mult 160,177,178,179
70.01 1 1ij0A ZN Rep, Mult 212,215
80.01 1 3ea3A MN Rep, Mult 123,124,179

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601xc6A0.4085.180.0550.5343.2.1.23NA
20.0601aodA0.4862.650.1600.5264.6.1.13,3.1.4.10123,179
30.0601ptdA0.5502.130.1020.5834.6.1.13207
40.0602e9bA0.3905.830.0310.5503.2.1.41129,147,198
50.0602vr5A0.4065.520.0360.5563.2.1.-NA
60.0602fhbA0.3775.820.0460.5283.2.1.41299
70.0601c7sA0.3985.530.0420.5443.2.1.52NA
80.0601djgB0.4524.500.0860.5583.1.4.11123,158
90.0601gymA0.5512.120.1060.5834.6.1.13,3.1.4.10123,179
100.0601a47A0.4465.960.0460.6302.4.1.19222
110.0601cygA0.4346.120.0610.6242.4.1.19NA
120.0601j0kA0.4336.400.0420.6393.2.1.135NA
130.0601j0hA0.4336.390.0530.6393.2.1.135NA
140.0602g3mF0.4295.590.0430.5873.2.1.20128
150.0602fhcA0.3775.820.0460.5283.2.1.41159
160.0602plcA0.4862.690.1560.5284.6.1.13101,145
170.0601izjA0.4326.280.0560.6283.2.1.135,3.2.1.1NA
180.0601ea9C0.4376.390.0470.6453.2.1.54NA
190.0601cgtA0.4486.170.0610.6432.4.1.19155

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.230.5721.850.120.603v1hA GO:0004436 GO:0005576 GO:0006629 GO:0008081 GO:0009405 GO:0016042 GO:0016829
10.200.5482.200.110.583ea1A GO:0004436 GO:0005576 GO:0006629 GO:0008081 GO:0016042 GO:0016829
20.070.4862.650.160.531aodA GO:0004436 GO:0005576 GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0008081 GO:0009405 GO:0016042 GO:0016829
30.070.4715.890.040.664amwA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0016829 GO:0030246 GO:0047457
40.060.4335.440.050.593wemA GO:0000023 GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0004558 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0032450
50.060.4095.590.050.565f7sB GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246
60.060.4345.660.040.605dkyA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246
70.060.4076.430.040.614ba0A GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0030246 GO:0033825
80.060.3846.480.060.584xpqA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246
90.060.4315.740.060.592f2hA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0042802 GO:0061634 GO:0080176
100.060.4305.550.040.593l4uA GO:0000023 GO:0003824 GO:0004339 GO:0004553 GO:0004558 GO:0005886 GO:0005975 GO:0005983 GO:0008152 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016160 GO:0016324 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0032450 GO:0044245 GO:0070062
110.060.4305.690.040.604kwuA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0046872
120.060.4295.760.070.593tonA GO:0000023 GO:0003824 GO:0004339 GO:0004553 GO:0004558 GO:0005886 GO:0005975 GO:0005983 GO:0008152 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016160 GO:0016324 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0032450 GO:0044245 GO:0070062
130.060.4295.590.040.592g3mF GO:0000023 GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0004558 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0032450
140.060.4325.570.040.593nsxA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246
150.060.4186.490.020.632xvgA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246
160.060.3936.690.050.605djwA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246
170.060.4106.860.050.645aedA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246
180.060.4275.570.050.593lppA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0004558 GO:0004574 GO:0004575 GO:0005794 GO:0005886 GO:0005903 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016324 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0044245 GO:0070062


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004436 GO:0008081
GO-Score 0.43 0.43
Biological Processes GO:0051704 GO:0016042
GO-Score 0.56 0.43
Cellular Component GO:0005576
GO-Score 0.43

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.