[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2022c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 4 4fh2A MA4 Rep, Mult 121,143,145,174
20.04 2 3qnfA UUU Rep, Mult 131,159,160
30.04 2 2a6sB IPA Rep, Mult 80,81,82,156,157,158
40.04 2 2aazA UMP Rep, Mult 133,143
50.04 2 5lcbN BCL Rep, Mult 174,177,181
60.04 2 3rkoL LFA Rep, Mult 98,101,102,132
70.04 2 2xquB CVM Rep, Mult 182,186
80.02 1 1gsaA MG Rep, Mult 119,131
90.02 1 3akkA MG Rep, Mult 128,149
100.02 1 3kisy NUC Rep, Mult 83,86,90,92,94,98,101,102,105,120,121,133,134,135,136,142,162,164
110.02 1 1qr0A MG Rep, Mult 80,82,108
120.02 1 3gdeA PO4 Rep, Mult 27,125,131
130.02 1 3rkoN LFA Rep, Mult 85,86,89,99,100,103
140.02 1 3d5bG MG Rep, Mult 110,116
150.02 1 2v9jE MG Rep, Mult 81,143
160.02 1 2pg0B FAD Rep, Mult 91,92,96,98,163

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601mhyD0.4175.110.0400.6721.14.13.25NA
20.0601ytmA0.4215.640.0640.7414.1.1.49NA
30.0602fahA0.4245.660.0550.7414.1.1.32NA
40.0602x1cA0.4365.600.0630.7462.3.1.164185
50.0601e1hC0.2885.530.0490.4883.4.24.6948,82,84,158
60.0601fziA0.4135.530.0480.7161.14.13.25NA
70.0602w2dA0.4245.000.0890.6773.4.24.69NA
80.0601bucA0.4175.520.0560.7261.3.99.2NA
90.0601jkyA0.4155.090.0430.6723.4.24.83170
100.0602gtqA0.4375.310.0560.7163.4.11.2NA
110.0601os1A0.4285.530.0770.7464.1.1.49NA
120.0602jifA0.4255.310.0280.7161.3.99.-NA
130.0601yrzA0.4195.620.0570.7263.2.1.37NA
140.0601yifA0.4195.610.0570.7263.2.1.37122,157,159,174
150.0601e1hD0.2364.660.0760.3533.4.24.69NA
160.0601o0sA0.4214.720.0360.6371.1.1.38NA
170.0602zciA0.4265.570.0480.7464.1.1.32NA
180.0601zxvA0.4175.030.0620.6623.4.24.83NA
190.0603d9dA0.4265.680.0590.7511.7.3.1NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.4135.370.070.694he8G GO:0005886 GO:0008137 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0042773 GO:0048038 GO:0055114
10.070.4455.530.130.764he8I GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0008137 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0042773 GO:0048038 GO:0050136 GO:0055114
20.070.4735.460.070.804he8F GO:0005886 GO:0008137 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0042773 GO:0048038 GO:0055114
30.060.4255.100.040.693efoB GO:0000139 GO:0001701 GO:0002474 GO:0005737 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0005794 GO:0005829 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0006888 GO:0008270 GO:0012507 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016192 GO:0019886 GO:0030127 GO:0048208 GO:0048471
40.060.3655.610.040.632ddsA GO:0004767 GO:0005576 GO:0008081 GO:0016787 GO:0019835 GO:0044179
50.060.3395.360.050.563aezA GO:0000166 GO:0004594 GO:0004849 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006206 GO:0008152 GO:0015937 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0040007 GO:0043097
60.060.3205.840.040.593swxB GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016853
70.060.3205.200.050.533k6yA GO:0001101 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0009403 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787
80.060.3056.220.040.582af3C GO:0005886 GO:0006085 GO:0008152 GO:0008959 GO:0016020 GO:0016407 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
90.060.3016.330.070.574ew6A GO:0016491 GO:0019151 GO:0055114
100.060.3176.100.070.604fluA GO:0000166 GO:0003676 GO:0003677 GO:0003887 GO:0006260 GO:0008408 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0071897 GO:0090305
110.060.3054.900.030.494i1tA GO:0000166 GO:0001172 GO:0003968 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0019012 GO:0019079 GO:0030430 GO:0039694
120.060.3215.880.030.552ddxA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0030247 GO:0033905 GO:0045493
130.060.3045.060.040.504frfA GO:0000166 GO:0000823 GO:0000824 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0008440 GO:0009555 GO:0009793 GO:0009846 GO:0009860 GO:0010183 GO:0016020 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0047326 GO:0090406
140.060.2905.600.040.504fu0A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
150.060.3085.500.060.522xi5A GO:0000166 GO:0001172 GO:0003968 GO:0006351 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0019079 GO:0039694 GO:0046872
160.060.3245.900.090.591tj7A GO:0003824 GO:0004056 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006526 GO:0008652 GO:0016829 GO:0042450 GO:0051262
170.060.2515.500.020.434f9gA GO:0000166 GO:0002218 GO:0002230 GO:0002376 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005741 GO:0005777 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0005794 GO:0005886 GO:0006915 GO:0008134 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0019901 GO:0030659 GO:0031625 GO:0032092 GO:0032479 GO:0032481 GO:0032608 GO:0033160 GO:0035438 GO:0035458 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0042993 GO:0045087 GO:0045944 GO:0048471 GO:0051607 GO:0061507 GO:0071360
180.060.3595.780.040.634xr7A GO:0000288 GO:0000289 GO:0000932 GO:0003676 GO:0004518 GO:0004527 GO:0004535 GO:0005737 GO:0006301 GO:0006397 GO:0016787 GO:0031251 GO:0090305 GO:0090503


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0048037 GO:0050136
GO-Score 0.37 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0006119 GO:0022904
GO-Score 0.37 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0071944
GO-Score 0.37

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.