[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2000

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.44 34 5j7xA FAD Rep, Mult 80,81,83,84,85,104,105,106,112,113,115,118,122,123,124,125,130,176,177,178,211,212,213,345,396,405,448,449
20.06 5 2ylwA NAP Rep, Mult 118,122,124,219,252,253,254,255,256,257,260,274,276,344,345,393,394,395,396
30.04 3 2xluA NA7 Rep, Mult 217,219,252,254,255,256,257,393,394,395

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602zzbC0.4544.630.0830.5551.8.1.9NA
20.0602npxA0.4614.550.0660.5641.11.1.1253
30.0601w4xA0.7712.800.1430.8401.14.13.92NA
40.0603dk9A0.4545.200.1040.5771.8.1.781,83,112,211,400,449
50.0602yquA0.4465.090.0980.5641.8.1.4NA
60.0603ladB0.4524.910.0920.5641.8.1.481,211
70.0601jehA0.4515.110.0780.5701.8.1.4NA
80.0602jk6A0.4574.790.0710.5621.8.1.12NA
90.0601f6mA0.4693.830.1080.5491.8.1.9NA
100.0602qaeA0.4484.960.0760.5621.8.1.4NA
110.0601zk7A0.4514.960.0890.5661.16.1.1305,310
120.0601f8wA0.4604.610.0630.5661.11.1.1NA
130.0601fl2A0.4004.720.0870.5011.8.1.-NA
140.0601lpfA0.4514.880.0860.5621.8.1.4500,506
150.0601mo9A0.4535.150.0930.5771.8.1.5NA
160.0603l8kA0.4485.130.0740.5681.8.1.483
170.0601bzlA0.4574.770.0820.5621.8.1.12NA
180.0601grtA0.4545.210.0990.5751.8.1.7NA
190.0602hqmB0.4515.080.0990.5661.8.1.783,398

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.260.7712.800.140.841w4xA GO:0004497 GO:0016491 GO:0033776 GO:0055114
10.260.7463.160.140.833gwdA GO:0000166 GO:0004497 GO:0004499 GO:0016491 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
20.250.7702.620.160.834aosA GO:0000166 GO:0004497 GO:0004499 GO:0016491 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
30.240.7572.980.140.833uozA GO:0004497 GO:0004499 GO:0016491 GO:0019383 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
40.140.5034.260.140.614usrA GO:0000166 GO:0004497 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
50.140.4983.890.140.594c5oD GO:0000166 GO:0004497 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
60.120.4953.990.120.594usqF GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
70.090.4485.130.070.573l8kA GO:0000166 GO:0004148 GO:0005623 GO:0016491 GO:0016668 GO:0045454 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
80.070.4723.670.100.553r9uA GO:0000166 GO:0004791 GO:0005737 GO:0016491 GO:0019430 GO:0055114
90.070.5364.100.130.642gv8A GO:0004497 GO:0004499 GO:0005739 GO:0005789 GO:0006457 GO:0016491 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
100.070.5344.170.110.642xlrC GO:0000166 GO:0004497 GO:0004499 GO:0016491 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
110.070.4615.670.090.611hyuA GO:0000302 GO:0005623 GO:0008785 GO:0009055 GO:0015035 GO:0016491 GO:0016651 GO:0045454 GO:0050660 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
120.070.4465.090.100.562yquA GO:0000166 GO:0004148 GO:0005623 GO:0006096 GO:0016491 GO:0016668 GO:0045454 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
130.060.4514.920.120.562r9zB GO:0000166 GO:0004362 GO:0005623 GO:0006749 GO:0016491 GO:0016668 GO:0045454 GO:0046872 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
140.060.4514.880.090.561lpfA GO:0004148 GO:0005737 GO:0006096 GO:0016491 GO:0016668 GO:0045454 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
150.060.4075.790.050.542gmhA GO:0004174 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0006979 GO:0009055 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0022900 GO:0043783 GO:0046872 GO:0048039 GO:0050660 GO:0051536 GO:0051539 GO:0055114
160.060.3975.820.070.531qo8A GO:0000104 GO:0016491 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
170.060.3845.270.110.513ab1B GO:0004324 GO:0016491 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
180.060.3875.740.070.523nixA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114 GO:0071949
190.060.3765.940.070.513kpfA GO:0016491 GO:0052893 GO:0052896 GO:0052897 GO:0052898 GO:0052900 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0004499
GO-Score 0.58 0.58 0.58
Biological Processes GO:0055114 GO:0018882 GO:0042182 GO:0016100
GO-Score 0.73 0.48 0.48 0.48
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.