[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1957

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 4 2ckjA FES Rep, Mult 132,133,135,163,164,165
20.07 3 2a4xB BLM Rep, Mult 143,151,158
30.07 3 3mflB DHY Rep, Mult 139,140
40.05 2 1i1eA DM2 Rep, Mult 28,29,104,106,137,138
50.05 2 3eubS FES Rep, Mult 146,149,150,156,157,158
60.02 1 1ozbD III Rep, Mult 31,32,33,35,38,77,97,98,101,103
70.02 1 1i72B PUT Rep, Mult 157,160
80.02 1 2ow9B CA Rep, Mult 6,102,104
90.02 1 1fiqA FAD Rep, Mult 142,143,144,159
100.02 1 1d8mA CA Rep, Mult 6,102,104,114
110.02 1 2o01G CLA Rep, Mult 142,181
120.02 1 5jtpD III Rep, Mult 46,47,48,49,50,51,53,54,55,59,67,69,120,121,122,125,126,129,130,157,158,159,162,164,166,167

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603fvrA0.4244.950.0490.6683.1.1.6NA
20.0601fo4A0.4235.730.0480.7791.17.1.4NA
30.0602pywA0.4214.390.0670.6302.7.1.100NA
40.0601oyrD0.4424.540.0520.6682.7.7.56NA
50.0603dd6A0.4424.640.0660.6742.7.7.56NA
60.0601vlqA0.4365.060.0560.7023.1.1.41NA
70.0601maaD0.3255.460.0600.5753.1.1.7NA
80.0603b9jI0.2405.230.0400.3811.17.1.4,1.17.3.279
90.0603ffzA0.4055.360.0330.7133.4.24.69NA
100.0601h7aA0.4014.530.0930.6191.17.4.2NA
110.0603btaA0.4254.910.0680.6803.4.24.69NA
120.0601lpaB0.4015.060.0350.6743.1.1.3NA
130.0601jrpB0.4125.220.0360.7021.17.1.4137
140.0602pplA0.4054.940.0420.6683.1.1.3NA
150.0601r6lA0.4304.550.0960.6522.7.7.5663,110
160.0601m0wA0.4065.670.0580.7576.3.2.3NA
170.0602oz5A0.4035.410.0690.6853.1.3.48145,162
180.0602vuaA0.3255.530.0500.5753.4.24.69143,148
190.0601clqA0.4304.040.0480.6082.7.7.7NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.300.6821.510.140.731qynD GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006457 GO:0006605 GO:0006810 GO:0008104 GO:0015031 GO:0043952 GO:0051082 GO:0051262 GO:0072321
10.250.7191.780.120.781fx3B GO:0005737 GO:0006457 GO:0006810 GO:0015031 GO:0051082 GO:0051262
20.110.5022.950.060.612hngA GO:0015031 GO:0051082 GO:0051262
30.070.5033.040.080.622o2aB GO:0015031 GO:0051082 GO:0051262
40.070.4605.560.060.824r1iA GO:0015558 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:1902604
50.070.4645.160.090.784wwxB GO:0002250 GO:0002331 GO:0003676 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0004842 GO:0005634 GO:0006310 GO:0008152 GO:0008270 GO:0010390 GO:0016568 GO:0016787 GO:0016874 GO:0030183 GO:0033077 GO:0033151 GO:0042393 GO:0042803 GO:0043029 GO:0043154 GO:0043565 GO:0045580 GO:0045582 GO:0046872 GO:0048538 GO:0051865 GO:0061630 GO:0070233 GO:0070244 GO:0090305
60.070.4975.090.070.823jbwA GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0004842 GO:0005634 GO:0006310 GO:0008152 GO:0008270 GO:0010390 GO:0016568 GO:0016787 GO:0016874 GO:0030183 GO:0033077 GO:0033151 GO:0042393 GO:0042803 GO:0043565 GO:0046872 GO:0061630 GO:0090305
70.070.4704.690.050.732np0A GO:0004222 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0008320 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0020002 GO:0030430 GO:0033644 GO:0044156 GO:0044164 GO:0044221 GO:0044231 GO:0046872 GO:0050827 GO:0051609 GO:0071806
80.070.4274.190.020.633v0aB GO:0004222 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0009405 GO:0050827 GO:0051609
90.060.3975.360.050.673v0aA GO:0004222 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0008320 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0020002 GO:0030430 GO:0033644 GO:0044156 GO:0044164 GO:0044221 GO:0044231 GO:0046872 GO:0050827 GO:0051609 GO:0071806
100.060.4055.360.030.713ffzA GO:0004222 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0008320 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0020002 GO:0030430 GO:0033644 GO:0044156 GO:0044164 GO:0044221 GO:0044231 GO:0046872 GO:0050827 GO:0051609 GO:0071806
110.060.4353.700.020.613vuoA GO:0004222 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0009405 GO:0050827 GO:0051609
120.060.3355.080.050.534gpaA GO:0004872 GO:0004970 GO:0004971 GO:0005216 GO:0005234 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007268 GO:0008328 GO:0014069 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030054 GO:0030425 GO:0032281 GO:0032983 GO:0034220 GO:0035235 GO:0042995 GO:0043025 GO:0043195 GO:0045202 GO:0045211 GO:0050803 GO:0050804 GO:0051968 GO:0060992
130.060.3205.690.030.593rsjA GO:0004222 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008270 GO:0009405 GO:0050827 GO:0051609
140.060.4335.280.060.724r0cD GO:0015558 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:1902604
150.060.3295.730.050.571a8dA GO:0004222 GO:0005576 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0008320 GO:0009405 GO:0016787 GO:0030666 GO:0030669 GO:0046872 GO:0046929 GO:0050827 GO:0051609 GO:0071806
160.060.2995.610.060.541xtfA GO:0004222 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0008320 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0020002 GO:0030430 GO:0033644 GO:0044156 GO:0044164 GO:0044221 GO:0044231 GO:0046872 GO:0050827 GO:0051609 GO:0071806
170.060.3215.050.050.523npkA GO:0004337 GO:0008299 GO:0016740
180.060.3205.300.040.554xx6B GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0031176


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0051082
GO-Score 0.56
Biological Processes GO:0051262 GO:0006457 GO:0043952 GO:0006605 GO:0072321
GO-Score 0.56 0.48 0.30 0.30 0.30
Cellular Component GO:0005829
GO-Score 0.30

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.