I-TASSER results

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1948c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>protein (116 residues)
MTVFGIKPDNYFGDVVLAAADRDGLRIFQYAVRSAHESGQATFDIDGVQQRIVRESGTAD
MELGSQTVVWRFDDTKLVEILDKLSPLIDGEGPGHQYIDDLNSPAPTLMISVDEYA

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| MTVFGIKPDNYFGDVVLAAADRDGLRIFQYAVRSAHESGQATFDIDGVQQRIVRESGTADMELGSQTVVWRFDDTKLVEILDKLSPLIDGEGPGHQYIDDLNSPAPTLMISVDEYA
Prediction	CCEEHCCCCCCCCCEEEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCEHCCCEEEEEEHCCCCCEEEHCCCEEEEEHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCEEHCCCCCCCCEEEEHCCCCC
Conf.Score	96675788755653466654745688999999877887574454587689999858985578758589998588999999999997578999865444457888876899867779
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| MTVFGIKPDNYFGDVVLAAADRDGLRIFQYAVRSAHESGQATFDIDGVQQRIVRESGTADMELGSQTVVWRFDDTKLVEILDKLSPLIDGEGPGHQYIDDLNSPAPTLMISVDEYA
Prediction	54235243432213011121444314303311441464344415363233412346633515245320002145630350153045146373423321541554243012324648
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Normalized B-facotr

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. (Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)

Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
Hit

Iden1

Iden2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
Align.

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

Sec.Str
Seq

CCEEHCCCCCCCCCEEEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCEHCCCEEEEEEHCCCCCEEEHCCCEEEEEHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCEEHCCCCCCCCEEEEHCCCCC
MTVFGIKPDNYFGDVVLAAADRDGLRIFQYAVRSAHESGQATFDIDGVQQRIVRESGTADMELGSQTVVWRFDDTKLVEILDKLSPLIDGEGPGHQYIDDLNSPAPTLMISVDEYA

1r9cA

0.19

0.16

0.87

0.60

MUSTER

MI--GLS-------MTFIVRDERMTRILEGVFASDTEQFSLSFLIGDIWVAIMQGEKLA--ERSYNHIAFKIDDADFDRYAERVGKLMRPPRPGRIYFYD---DD-MFELHTGTLT

1r9cA

0.14

0.13

0.91

0.57

dPPAS

-------MIEGLSHMTFIVRDERMTRILEGVFASDTEQFSLSFLIGDIWVAIMQGEKLA--ERSYNHIAFKIDDADFDRYAERVGKLRPPRPGRSIYFYDDDN--HMFELHTGTLT

1r9cA

0.18

0.16

0.85

0.60

wdPPAS

M-IEGLS-------MTFIVRDERMTRILEGVFASDTEQFSLSFLIGDIWVAIMQGEKLAE---SYNHIAFKIDDADFDRYAERVGKL--PPRPGRIYFYD---DD-MFELHTGTLT

1r9cA

0.17

0.15

0.87

0.63

wMUSTER

IEGLS---------MTFIVRDERMTRILEGVFASDTEQFSLSFLIGDIWVAIMQGEKLA--ERSYNHIAFKIDDADFDRYAERVGKLMRPPRPGRIYFYD---DD-MFELHTGTLT

1r9cA

0.19

0.16

0.85

0.61

wPPAS

M----IE----LSHMTFIVRDERMTRILEGVFASDTEQFSLSFLIGDIWVAIMQGEKLA--ERSYNHIAFKIDDADFDRYAERVGKL--PPRPGRIYFYD---D--MFELHTGTLT

3mmlB1

0.17

0.10

0.60

0.67

dPPAS2

LGTVH-----NYGDALLLEFDSAEVLAWTETLREAE------------------LLGVVDIVPAARTVLVKLAPRYQAPTRQRLGKLRVRPEA-----------------------

1r9cA

0.19

0.16

0.87

0.71

PPAS

M----IE----LSHMTFIVRDERMTRILEGVFASDTEQFSLSFLIGDIWVAIMQGEKLA--ERSYNHIAFKIDDADFDRYAERVGKLMRPPRPGRIYFYD---D--MFELHTGTLT

2jnbA

0.15

0.13

0.87

0.76

Env-PPAS

MTEADVNP-KAY----PLA-DAHLTKKLLDLVQQSCNYKQ--LRKG--ANEAT-----KTLNRGISEFIVMAADAEPLEIILHLPLLCEDKNVPYVFVRSVSRPVIACSVTIKEGS

4za1A

0.18

0.15

0.81

0.60

MUSTER

--------QQLYCTVVLWDLSRSAVASLRAYLRDHAVDAYTTVP--GLRQKTWISSTGPEGEQWGAVYLWDSPEAAYGRPVSKVVELIGYR------------PTERRYYSVEAAT

4za1A

0.18

0.15

0.81

0.54

dPPAS

--------QQLYCTVVLWDLSRSAVASLRAYLRDHAVDAYTT--VPGLRQKTWISSTGPEGEQWGAVYLWDSPEAAYGRPVSKVVELIGYR------------PTERRYYSVEAAT

(a)	Iden1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	Iden2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment.
(e)	Download Align. list the threading program used to identify the template provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates.

Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)

More about C-score

Local structure accuracy of first model

Download Model 1

C-score=-2.13

Estimated TM-score = 0.46±0.15

Estimated RMSD = 8.8±4.6Å

Download Model 2

C-score=-3.33

Download Model 3

C-score=-2.87

Download Model 4

C-score=-5.00

Download Model 5

C-score=-5.00

Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)

Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov
1	4huzA	0.659	3.09	0.046	0.914
2	4qb5A	0.648	2.72	0.101	0.853
3	4ro6A	0.648	3.02	0.065	0.897
4	4z04A	0.646	2.73	0.081	0.845
5	1zswA	0.646	3.35	0.083	0.914
6	3oajA	0.644	3.26	0.074	0.905
7	3zi1A	0.643	3.14	0.128	0.914
8	1r9cA	0.633	2.65	0.121	0.828
9	1eiqA	0.626	2.95	0.108	0.862
10	2zi8A	0.625	2.91	0.088	0.853

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

Ligand binding sites

Rank	C-score	Cluster size	PDB Hit	Lig Name	Download Complex	Ligand Binding Site Residues
1	0.06	3	2ei3A	BPY	Rep, Mult	24,28,32,52
2	0.06	3	2p7pA	MN	Rep, Mult	67,97,109
3	0.04	2	1c9bQ	NUC	Rep, Mult	76,83
4	0.04	2	1lkdA	BP6	Rep, Mult	14,46,47,49
5	0.04	2	2ehzA	MCT	Rep, Mult	69,70,71,96,110,111,113
6	0.04	2	2p7qC	GG6	Rep, Mult	65,67,97,109,116
7	0.02	1	1lnyA	MG	Rep, Mult	14,39
8	0.02	1	3fpvA	FE	Rep, Mult	70,98
9	0.02	1	4llhA	CM5	Rep, Mult	22,26
10	0.02	1	2ehzA	MCT	Rep, Mult	4,14,16,17
11	0.02	1	1z2oX	MG	Rep, Mult	100,102
12	0.02	1	3m4oA	C7P	Rep, Mult	31,32,35
13	0.02	1	3amrA	CA	Rep, Mult	89,95
14	0.02	1	1cgpA	CMP	Rep, Mult	81,85
15	0.02	1	2qvmA	CA	Rep, Mult	44,74
16	0.02	1	1f8iB	MG	Rep, Mult	14,60
17	0.02	1	2jfkD	COA	Rep, Mult	53,54
18	0.02	1	2vk6A	MG	Rep, Mult	8,9

	Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
	Download the templates clustering results.
(a)	C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)	Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)	Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)	Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column. Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	EC Number	Active Site Residues
1	0.066	1npbA	0.609	3.24	0.099	0.853	2.5.1.18	18
2	0.066	1f9zA	0.569	3.04	0.063	0.802	4.4.1.5	NA
3	0.060	1bsgA	0.468	4.64	0.085	0.871	3.5.2.6	38,81
4	0.060	1fa7B	0.572	3.02	0.063	0.802	4.4.1.5	17
5	0.060	1mpyA	0.614	3.00	0.126	0.845	1.13.11.2	NA
6	0.060	2ehzA	0.602	3.12	0.097	0.853	1.13.11.-	NA
7	0.060	2j9pA	0.467	4.68	0.056	0.871	3.4.16.4	NA
8	0.060	2pbyA	0.498	4.18	0.075	0.836	3.5.1.2	NA
9	0.060	1eilA	0.626	2.95	0.108	0.862	1.13.11.39	NA
10	0.060	2p25A	0.537	3.32	0.074	0.802	4.4.1.5	NA
11	0.060	3f2bA	0.466	4.31	0.072	0.767	2.7.7.7	NA
12	0.060	1cjxA	0.496	4.28	0.067	0.871	1.13.11.27	84
13	0.060	2zi8A	0.625	2.91	0.088	0.853	1.13.11.39	NA
14	0.060	1lqkA	0.616	3.06	0.108	0.862	2.5.1.18	NA
15	0.060	1sqiA	0.567	3.28	0.066	0.836	1.13.11.27	NA
16	0.060	2e8iA	0.474	4.47	0.083	0.853	3.5.1.46	25,31,35
17	0.060	3lm4D	0.609	2.87	0.067	0.819	1.13.11.2	NA
18	0.060	3brmB	0.468	4.38	0.038	0.828	3.5.1.2	31,38
19	0.060	1lqoB	0.611	3.09	0.108	0.862	2.5.1.18	18
20	0.060	1djaA	0.453	5.08	0.072	0.888	3.5.2.6	NA
21	0.060	1g68A	0.459	5.05	0.045	0.897	3.5.2.6	NA

(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Rank	Cscore^GO	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	PDB Hit	Associated GO Terms
Homologous GO templates in PDB
0	0.25	0.633	2.65	0.12	0.83	1r9cA	GO:0005737 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
1	0.21	0.584	2.94	0.03	0.82	2c21A	GO:0004462 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
2	0.18	0.622	2.67	0.11	0.83	2p7pA	GO:0005737 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
3	0.18	0.616	3.06	0.11	0.86	1lqkA	GO:0004364 GO:0005737 GO:0016740 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
4	0.16	0.664	2.68	0.09	0.87	4qb5D	GO:0051213 GO:0055114
5	0.12	0.600	3.16	0.09	0.87	3ct8A	GO:0046872
6	0.11	0.597	2.96	0.07	0.81	4nazA	GO:0000287 GO:0005737 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
7	0.10	0.565	3.30	0.09	0.83	1qipB	GO:0004462 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0006090 GO:0006357 GO:0006749 GO:0008270 GO:0009438 GO:0016829 GO:0030316 GO:0043066 GO:0046872 GO:0070062
8	0.09	0.646	2.73	0.08	0.84	4z04A	GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
9	0.09	0.643	3.14	0.13	0.91	3zi1A	GO:0005739 GO:0005913 GO:0070062 GO:0098609 GO:0098641
10	0.08	0.569	3.04	0.06	0.80	1f9zA	GO:0004462 GO:0005829 GO:0016151 GO:0016829 GO:0019243 GO:0046872
11	0.07	0.559	3.02	0.04	0.79	3l7tA	GO:0004462 GO:0046872
12	0.07	0.605	3.00	0.07	0.84	4jd1B	GO:0000287 GO:0004364 GO:0005737 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
13	0.07	0.560	3.05	0.09	0.79	3ey7A	GO:0003824 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
14	0.07	0.646	3.35	0.08	0.91	1zswA	GO:0046872
15	0.07	0.644	3.26	0.07	0.91	3oajA	GO:0005737 GO:0009636 GO:0016491 GO:0019439 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
16	0.07	0.582	3.10	0.09	0.83	4mtsA	GO:0004462 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
17	0.07	0.565	3.31	0.09	0.83	4kykA	GO:0004462 GO:0005975 GO:0006357 GO:0006749 GO:0008270 GO:0009438 GO:0016829 GO:0019243 GO:0030316 GO:0043066 GO:0046872 GO:0070062
18	0.07	0.616	3.11	0.11	0.84	3kolA	GO:0004462 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
19	0.07	0.551	3.22	0.11	0.81	3hnqA	GO:0009405
20	0.07	0.659	3.09	0.05	0.91	4huzA	GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
21	0.07	0.609	3.24	0.10	0.85	1npbA	GO:0004364 GO:0005737 GO:0016740 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
22	0.07	0.648	3.02	0.07	0.90	5d7zA	GO:0004462 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
23	0.07	0.526	4.09	0.09	0.90	2r5vA	GO:0003868 GO:0005506 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0017000 GO:0033072 GO:0046872 GO:0050585 GO:0055114
24	0.07	0.608	2.96	0.08	0.84	4jh1A	GO:0000287 GO:0005737 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
25	0.07	0.542	3.31	0.08	0.80	3g12B	GO:0016829
26	0.06	0.365	4.63	0.05	0.65	2xclA	GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0004637 GO:0005524 GO:0006164 GO:0006189 GO:0009113 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
27	0.06	0.394	4.59	0.06	0.71	2cgjA	GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0008993 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019299 GO:0019301 GO:0046835

Consensus prediction of GO terms

Molecular Function	GO:0046872	GO:0016846	GO:0016765	GO:0016491
GO-Score	0.60	0.41	0.35	0.31
Biological Processes	GO:0046677	GO:0044710
GO-Score	0.50	0.31
Cellular Component	GO:0005737
GO-Score	0.50

(a)	Cscore^GO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)	The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on Cscore^GO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1.	J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2.	J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.	A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.	Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.