[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1867

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.19 15 5ab7A MLC Rep, Mult 88,89,127,166,170,215,228,236,238,240,242,243,319,321,322,350,385,386,387
20.10 9 2wkvB COA Rep, Mult 89,167,213,219,220,231,236,237,242,321,322,385
30.07 6 2d3tC ACO Rep, Mult 89,166,200,220,231,238,319,321,322,355,385
40.01 1 2wl5A DNO Rep, Mult 216,218,219
50.01 1 1wdlC ACO Rep, Mult 220,231,236,237,243
60.01 1 3f1f4 MG Rep, Mult 319,320
70.01 1 4yzoD CA Rep, Mult 88,89,386,387
80.01 1 1i95K WO2 Rep, Mult 233,234
90.01 1 2wl5C DNO Rep, Mult 148,149
100.01 1 1c3xB CA Rep, Mult 182,194
110.01 1 2v1rA III Rep, Mult 319,322,356,359,360
120.01 1 2w35A MG Rep, Mult 245,317
130.01 1 2wkuA DNO Rep, Mult 202,344,346
140.01 1 2wl5C DNO Rep, Mult 304,305,306,307
150.01 1 3begB UUU Rep, Mult 315,319
160.01 1 3ej3B ACT Rep, Mult 207,230

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.1091wdkD0.6303.270.1470.7132.3.1.16240,322
20.1071afwB0.6263.490.1520.7132.3.1.16387
30.1031m1tA0.6173.380.1560.6962.3.1.9NA
40.0982iikB0.6173.350.1430.6962.3.1.16387
50.0851pxtB0.5673.240.1510.6382.3.1.16NA
60.0672ebdA0.4553.560.1470.5242.3.1.180NA
70.0661hn9A0.4513.580.1130.5202.3.1.180NA
80.0663h77B0.4623.650.1720.5342.3.1.180364
90.0661tedA0.4813.930.1350.5632.3.1.74NA
100.0661mzjA0.4573.830.1340.5342.3.1.180NA
110.0602c7yB0.6023.190.1620.6742.3.1.16386
120.0602jfdA0.2307.120.0420.3642.3.1.85NA
130.0601j3nA0.5093.850.1400.5912.3.1.41NA
140.0602ix4A0.5133.840.1330.5952.3.1.41386
150.0601wdkC0.6313.270.1500.7132.3.1.16387
160.0602c9hA0.5113.890.1410.5952.3.1.41NA
170.0602wgdA0.5014.050.1300.5932.3.1.41NA
180.0601e5mA0.5103.960.1250.5952.3.1.179NA
190.0601w0iA0.5133.900.1330.5972.3.1.41NA
200.0603kzuA0.5123.790.1150.5932.3.1.41NA
210.0602ib7D0.6173.400.1440.6942.3.1.9387
220.0603e1hA0.4914.000.1170.5792.3.1.74NA
230.0601dd8A0.5033.960.0980.5872.3.1.41NA
240.0602c7zA0.6023.190.1620.6742.3.1.1693
250.0603fk5A0.4833.960.1310.5712.3.1.41NA
260.0602p0uA0.4834.100.1130.5772.3.1.74NA
270.0602gqdA0.5093.980.1220.5972.3.1.179NA
280.0603hmjA0.5213.970.0740.6112.3.1.86NA
290.0601kasA0.5073.870.1400.5912.3.1.179386

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.440.8801.330.350.904egvC GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016740
10.250.6852.670.170.754bi9C GO:0003824 GO:0003988 GO:0005739 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
20.230.6562.910.170.735ab5A GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016747
30.170.6293.280.150.712d3tC GO:0003824 GO:0003988 GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016042 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
40.170.6173.400.140.692ib7D GO:0001889 GO:0003824 GO:0003985 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005759 GO:0007420 GO:0008152 GO:0009083 GO:0009725 GO:0014070 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747 GO:0019899 GO:0042594 GO:0042803 GO:0046872 GO:0046951 GO:0046952 GO:0050662 GO:0051260 GO:0060612 GO:0070062 GO:0072229
50.110.6113.020.200.684u4eA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016747
60.110.6182.750.170.684yzoA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
70.110.6153.220.170.693goaB GO:0003824 GO:0003988 GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016042 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
80.100.6002.920.170.664e1lD GO:0003824 GO:0003985 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
90.100.6093.470.140.693ss6A GO:0003824 GO:0003985 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
100.100.6872.670.140.753zbgA GO:0003824 GO:0003988 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
110.090.5703.410.180.643svkA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
120.090.5673.240.150.641pxtB GO:0003729 GO:0003824 GO:0003988 GO:0005758 GO:0005777 GO:0005782 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
130.070.6253.360.180.715bz4G GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016747
140.070.6263.490.150.711afwB GO:0003729 GO:0003824 GO:0003988 GO:0005758 GO:0005777 GO:0005782 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
150.070.6143.290.160.694nzsA GO:0003824 GO:0003985 GO:0003988 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
160.070.6203.400.170.704b3iD GO:0003824 GO:0005618 GO:0005886 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
170.070.6233.280.160.701ulqC GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
180.070.6183.340.140.694o9cA GO:0003824 GO:0003985 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747 GO:0042619
190.070.6183.310.150.702wuaB GO:0003824 GO:0003988 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
200.070.6183.320.180.694dd5A GO:0003824 GO:0003985 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
210.070.6203.370.140.701wl4A GO:0003824 GO:0003985 GO:0005634 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747 GO:0070062
220.070.6213.620.160.714e1lA GO:0003824 GO:0003985 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
230.070.6173.350.140.702iikB GO:0000038 GO:0003824 GO:0003988 GO:0005777 GO:0005782 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0008206 GO:0008775 GO:0016020 GO:0016401 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747 GO:0033540 GO:0036109 GO:0043231
240.070.6193.420.170.702wu9A GO:0003824 GO:0003988 GO:0005730 GO:0005739 GO:0005774 GO:0005777 GO:0005829 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0009507 GO:0009514 GO:0009611 GO:0009695 GO:0009789 GO:0010111 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747 GO:0031408
250.070.6193.520.140.704ubtA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016747


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003988 GO:0046983 GO:0048037 GO:0043169 GO:0016453 GO:0042802
GO-Score 0.38 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
Biological Processes GO:0010033 GO:0060322 GO:0072237 GO:1902224 GO:0009719 GO:0061448 GO:0006950 GO:0031667 GO:0061008 GO:0051259 GO:0009062 GO:0007417 GO:0048732 GO:0019395 GO:0044249 GO:0009081 GO:0044283 GO:1901576 GO:1901565 GO:0046950 GO:0072019
GO-Score 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
Cellular Component GO:0031966 GO:1903561 GO:0019866 GO:0031988 GO:0070013
GO-Score 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.