I-TASSER results

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1864c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>protein (251 residues)
MTVAPRRLAWTNARQSYPVRVAHVLSVNLARVRANPDPRAQSKLTGIDKVAASEAVMVRA
PGSMHAGVGSGLVGDTVGNPKLHGGDDQAVYAYAREDLDAWETQLHRTLHNGMFGENLTT
SGVDVTYARIGERWRIGSDGLVLEVSAPRIPCRTFAAFLDLRYWIKTFTRAAKPGAYLRV
IAPGTVRAGDTITVDYRPEHNVTVGLVFRARTSESELLPQLLAADALAAELKAYARERTP
SPPPVDSADDV

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MTVAPRRLAWTNARQSYPVRVAHVLSVNLARVRANPDPRAQSKLTGIDKVAASEAVMVRAPGSMHAGVGSGLVGDTVGNPKLHGGDDQAVYAYAREDLDAWETQLHRTLHNGMFGENLTTSGVDVTYARIGERWRIGSDGLVLEVSAPRIPCRTFAAFLDLRYWIKTFTRAAKPGAYLRVIAPGTVRAGDTITVDYRPEHNVTVGLVFRARTSESELLPQLLAADALAAELKAYARERTPSPPPVDSADDV
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEHCCEEHCCCCCCCEEEHCEEEEHCCCCEEEHCCCCCCHCCCCCCCCCEHCCCCCCCCCCCEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCEEHCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEHCCCCEEEEEHCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCEEEEEHCCEEHCCCEEEEEEHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCC
Conf.Score	98888877776777778875558999986555555678887566555556568877865566644446788888655588778985434554367799999999699999876678589679875568898899987887799998589986788899888776788876488858999965858779878999967999999999999975999999999978788999999999999967655665679
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MTVAPRRLAWTNARQSYPVRVAHVLSVNLARVRANPDPRAQSKLTGIDKVAASEAVMVRAPGSMHAGVGSGLVGDTVGNPKLHGGDDQAVYAYAREDLDAWETQLHRTLHNGMFGENLTTSGVDVTYARIGERWRIGSDGLVLEVSAPRIPCRTFAAFLDLRYWIKTFTRAAKPGAYLRVIAPGTVRAGDTITVDYRPEHNVTVGLVFRARTSESELLPQLLAADALAAELKAYARERTPSPPPVDSADDV
Prediction	75344543635615463314103000021032452444645422000313327332404334444334532021032044621324320000023300430173044214101000000034042740301210201354020200322420230042263540231015242100000014514044615030244356602012013024534610430171550275015304521774546645668
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Normalized B-facotr

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. (Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)

Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
Hit

Iden1

Iden2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
Align.

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

Sec.Str
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEHCCEEHCCCCCCCEEEHCEEEEHCCCCEEEHCCCCCCHCCCCCCCCCEHCCCCCCCCCCCEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCEEHCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEHCCCCEEEEEHCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCEEEEEHCCEEHCCCEEEEEEHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCC
MTVAPRRLAWTNARQSYPVRVAHVLSVNLARVRANPDPRAQSKLTGIDKVAASEAVMVRAPGSMHAGVGSGLVGDTVGNPKLHGGDDQAVYAYAREDLDAWETQLHRTLHNGMFGENLTTSGVDVTYARIGERWRIGSDGLVLEVSAPRIPCRTFAAFLDLRYWIKTFTRAAKPGAYLRVIAPGTVRAGDTITVDYRPEHNVTVGLVFRARTSESELLPQLLAADALAAELKAYARERTPSPPPVDSADDV

1o67A

0.26

0.21

0.79

2.59

MUSTER

---------------------------FLVER---EQRYPVDVYTGKAKIQVDG----------ELLTELGLEGD-------EGGPDRALCHYPREHYLYWAREFPEQFVAPAFGENLSTDGLTESNV-YGDIFRWG--EALIQVSQPRSPCYKLNYHFDISDI-AQLQNTGKVGWLYSVIAPGKVSADAPLELVSRV-SDVTVQEAAAIAWFDDDQYHRLLSAAGLSKSWTRTQKRRLSG-KIEDFSRRL

1o67A

0.26

0.20

0.79

5.73

dPPAS

------------------------------FLVEREQRYPVDVYTGKAKIQVDG----------ELLTELGLEGD-------EGGPDRALCHYPREHYLYWAREFPEQFVAPAFGENLSTDGLTESNV-YGDIFRWGE--ALIQVSQPRSPCYKLNYHFDISDI-AQLQNTGKVGWLYSVIAPGKVSADAPLELVSRV-SDVTVQEAAAIAWFDDDQYHRLLSAAGLSKSWTRTQKRRLSG-KIEDFSRRL

1o67A

0.26

0.21

0.79

5.89

wdPPAS

---------------------------FLVER---EQRYPVDVYTGKAKIQVDG----------ELLTELGLEGD-------EGGPDRALCHYPREHYLYWAREFPELFVAPAFGENLSTDGLTESNV-YGDIFRWGE--ALIQVSQPRSPCYKLNYHFDISDI-AQLQNTGKVGWLYSVIAPGKVSADAPLELVSRV-SDVTVQEAAAIAWFDDDQYHRLLSAAGLSKSWTRTQKRRLSG-KIEDFSRRL

1o67A

0.26

0.21

0.79

3.10

wMUSTER

---------------------------FLVER---EQRYPVDVYTGKAKIQVDG----------ELLTELGLEGD-------EGGPDRALCHYPREHYLYWAREFPEQFVAPAFGENLSTDGLTESNV-YGDIFRWG--EALIQVSQPRSPCYKLNYHFDISDI-AQLQNTGKVGWLYSVIAPGKVSADAPLELVSRV-SDVTVQEAAAIAWFDDDQYHRLLSAAGLSKSWTRTQKRRLSG-KIEDFSRRL

1o67A

0.26

0.21

0.78

5.01

wPPAS

---------------------------FLVEREQR----PVDVYTGKAKIQVDG----------ELLTELGLEGD-------EGGPDRALCHYPREHYLYWAREFPELFVAPAFGENLSTDGLTESNV-YGDIFRWGE--ALIQVSQPRSPCYKLNYHFDISDI-AQLQNTGKVGWLYSVIAPGKVSADAPLELVSRV-SDVTVQEAAAIAWFDDDQYHRLLSAAGLSKSWTRTQKRRLSG-KIEDFSRRL

1o67A

0.26

0.20

0.77

14.52

dPPAS2

----------------------------------FEQRYPVDVYTGKAKIQVDG----------ELLTELGLEGD-------EGGPDRALCHYPREHYLYWAREFPEQFVAPAFGENLSTDGLTESNV-YGDIFRWGE--ALIQVSQPRSPCYKLNYHFDISDI-AQLQNTGKVGWLYSVIAPGKVSADAPLELVSRV-SDVTVQEAAAIAWFDDDQYHRLLSAAGLSKSWTRTQKRRLSG-KIEDFSRRL

1o67A

0.26

0.21

0.78

4.16

PPAS

---------------------------FLVEREQR---YPVDVYTGKAKIQVDGEL-----------TELGLEGD-------EGGPDRALCHYPREHYLYWAREFPEQFVAPAFGENLSTDGLTESNV-YGDIFRWGE--ALIQVSQPRSPCYKLNYHFDISDI-AQLQNTGKVGWLYSVIAPGKVSADAPLELVSRV-SDVTVQEAAAIAWFDDDQYHRLLSAAGLSKSWTRTQKRRLSG-KIEDFSRRL

1o67A

0.26

0.21

0.79

4.83

Env-PPAS

---------------------------FLVER---EQRYPVDVYTGKAKIQVDGELL----------TELGLEGD-------EGGPDRALCHYPREHYLYWAREFPELFVAPAFGENLSTDGLTESNV-YGDIFRWGE--ALIQVSQPRSPCYKLNYHFDISDIAQ-LQNTGKVGWLYSVIAPGKVSADAPLELVSRV-SDVTVQEAAAIAWFDDDQYHRLLSAAGLSKSWTRTQKRRLSG-KIEDFSRRL

1oruA

0.22

0.14

0.63

1.41

MUSTER

-------------------------------------WKRTAKAEGLY--IADTKSFVTKQDKLDFDYG-GIPGDLHFGLTKAGARERQISIVSIEECNEIALKGVPRILPEWLGANVAVSGPDLTSLKEGSRIIFPS-GAALLCEGENDPCIQPGEVIQQPKLASAFVRHGIRGIVCIVERPGAVYTGDEIEVHSYQ-----------------------------------------------------

1oruA

0.20

0.13

0.63

3.16

dPPAS

-------------------------------------WKRTAKAEGLYIADTKSFV---TKQDKLDFDYGGIPGDKAGAREPFSRNRRQISIVSIEECNEIALKGVPRILPEWLGANVAVSGPDLTSLKEGSRIIFPS-GAALLCEGENDPCIQPGEVIQQPKLASAFVRHGIRGIVCIVERPGAVYTGDEIEVHSYQ-----------------------------------------------------

(a)	Iden1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	Iden2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment.
(e)	Download Align. list the threading program used to identify the template provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates.

Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)

More about C-score

Local structure accuracy of first model

Download Model 1

C-score=-0.46

Estimated TM-score = 0.65±0.13

Estimated RMSD = 6.8±4.0Å

Download Model 2

C-score=-0.94

Download Model 3

C-score=-0.76

Download Model 4

C-score=-1.73

Download Model 5

C-score=-0.75

Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)

Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov
1	1o67A	0.692	2.43	0.239	0.785
2	1oruA	0.495	2.81	0.150	0.586
3	4he8L	0.447	6.10	0.081	0.777
4	3rkoL	0.444	6.06	0.089	0.769
5	4he8N	0.434	6.09	0.124	0.745
6	1yiqA	0.431	5.72	0.045	0.705
7	3rkoN	0.427	6.08	0.037	0.745
8	5ifiA	0.416	5.74	0.040	0.693
9	1suvA	0.412	5.80	0.065	0.701
10	3fahA	0.409	5.81	0.052	0.673

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

Ligand binding sites

Rank	C-score	Cluster size	PDB Hit	Lig Name	Download Complex	Ligand Binding Site Residues
1	0.05	3	4oicB	MN	Rep, Mult	95,97
2	0.05	3	1sijA	FES	Rep, Mult	70,71,72,74,75,76,77,79
3	0.03	2	1jp4A	MG	Rep, Mult	71,116
4	0.03	2	4uc1A	Z0P	Rep, Mult	228,231,235
5	0.03	2	1c3xB	CA	Rep, Mult	112,116
6	0.03	2	2wse1	CLA	Rep, Mult	172,175
7	0.02	1	3toyA	CA	Rep, Mult	238,241
8	0.02	1	2h2sA	SEK	Rep, Mult	28,30,188
9	0.02	1	3zs0C	UUU	Rep, Mult	117,123
10	0.02	1	3s7wA	AZI	Rep, Mult	146,179,181
11	0.02	1	3fahA	GOL	Rep, Mult	156,160,161
12	0.02	1	1g42A	CP2	Rep, Mult	74,75
13	0.02	1	2xb2C	III	Rep, Mult	87,165
14	0.02	1	4mjtA	ZN	Rep, Mult	97,99
15	0.02	1	2zo5A	HEC	Rep, Mult	111,113,151,154,155,158,159,162,164,167,168,172
16	0.02	1	1n1lB	III	Rep, Mult	46,187,189,191
17	0.02	1	3bk7A	SF4	Rep, Mult	111,117,118,119,120,121
18	0.02	1	2bq8X	ZN	Rep, Mult	132,139
19	0.02	1	3kviA	FAH	Rep, Mult	228,229
20	0.02	1	5lopA	MG	Rep, Mult	236,237

	Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
	Download the templates clustering results.
(a)	C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)	Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)	Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)	Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column. Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	EC Number	Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2e1qA	0.357	6.35	0.063	0.645	1.17.3.2,1.17.1.4	NA
2	0.060	1zj9B	0.392	6.05	0.059	0.697	1.8.7.1	31
3	0.060	1cb7B	0.383	5.84	0.036	0.637	5.4.99.1	144
4	0.060	1k1dA	0.397	5.93	0.041	0.669	3.5.2.-	NA
5	0.060	3ebgA	0.383	6.16	0.059	0.673	3.4.11.-	NA
6	0.060	1vlbA	0.347	6.63	0.019	0.653	1.2.99.7	137,175
7	0.060	1ynyB	0.396	6.06	0.058	0.681	3.5.2.2	NA
8	0.060	1ti2A	0.396	6.05	0.045	0.673	1.97.1.2	NA
9	0.060	3b9jI	0.278	5.60	0.052	0.458	1.17.1.4,1.17.3.2	111,154
10	0.060	1x6vA	0.389	5.64	0.054	0.645	2.7.1.25,2.7.7.4	95,110,149
11	0.060	3b9jC	0.337	6.11	0.035	0.602	1.17.3.2,1.17.1.4	NA
12	0.060	2ftwA	0.398	6.13	0.027	0.689	3.5.2.2	NA
13	0.060	3hm7B	0.386	6.06	0.032	0.677	3.5.2.5	NA
14	0.060	1gkpA	0.391	6.08	0.045	0.673	3.5.2.2	185
15	0.060	1zj8A	0.387	6.10	0.069	0.693	1.8.7.1	149,173
16	0.060	2ckjA	0.315	6.31	0.031	0.558	1.17.1.4,1.17.3.2	NA
17	0.060	2r9vA	0.384	5.97	0.086	0.653	3.6.3.14	171
18	0.060	1ti6A	0.364	6.56	0.029	0.673	1.97.1.2	NA
19	0.060	1nfgA	0.395	6.13	0.046	0.681	3.5.2.2	NA

(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Rank	Cscore^GO	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	PDB Hit	Associated GO Terms
Homologous GO templates in PDB
0	0.36	0.722	2.39	0.24	0.82	1o65A	GO:0003824 GO:0005829 GO:0009636 GO:0030151 GO:0030170
1	0.18	0.503	2.90	0.15	0.60	1oruA	GO:0003824 GO:0030151 GO:0030170
2	0.06	0.406	6.43	0.08	0.74	4he8G	GO:0005886 GO:0008137 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0042773 GO:0048038 GO:0055114
3	0.06	0.432	6.16	0.09	0.75	4he8I	GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0008137 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0042773 GO:0048038 GO:0050136 GO:0055114
4	0.06	0.330	6.24	0.03	0.58	4aahA	GO:0005509 GO:0005886 GO:0015945 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0030288 GO:0046872 GO:0052930 GO:0052931 GO:0052932 GO:0052933 GO:0055114
5	0.06	0.431	5.72	0.04	0.71	1yiqA	GO:0005509 GO:0009055 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0020037 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070968
6	0.06	0.352	6.25	0.01	0.62	4cvbA	GO:0046872
7	0.06	0.327	6.51	0.02	0.59	1kv9A	GO:0005509 GO:0009055 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0020037 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070968
8	0.06	0.300	6.17	0.04	0.54	2v6gA	GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0016491 GO:0047787 GO:0050662 GO:0055114
9	0.06	0.393	6.03	0.05	0.67	4maeA	GO:0005509 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0052930 GO:0052931 GO:0052932 GO:0052933 GO:0052934 GO:0052935 GO:0052936 GO:0055114
10	0.06	0.387	5.80	0.05	0.65	1lrwA	GO:0005509 GO:0015945 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0052930 GO:0052931 GO:0052932 GO:0052933 GO:0055114
11	0.06	0.378	6.04	0.07	0.65	1kb0A	GO:0005509 GO:0009055 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0020037 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
12	0.06	0.297	6.60	0.03	0.55	2wtxD	GO:0003824 GO:0003825 GO:0005829 GO:0005992 GO:0006970 GO:0006974 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0070415
13	0.06	0.386	5.70	0.04	0.64	4tqoA	GO:0005509 GO:0015946 GO:0016020 GO:0016614 GO:0018468 GO:0030288 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
14	0.06	0.387	5.68	0.06	0.63	2d0vA	GO:0005509 GO:0016020 GO:0016614 GO:0030288 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
15	0.06	0.380	5.93	0.05	0.64	1w6sC	GO:0005509 GO:0005886 GO:0015945 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0030288 GO:0046872 GO:0052930 GO:0052931 GO:0052932 GO:0052933 GO:0055114
16	0.06	0.349	6.12	0.04	0.61	1flgA	GO:0005509 GO:0006069 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0018468 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0052934 GO:0052935 GO:0052936 GO:0055114
17	0.06	0.309	6.60	0.04	0.58	2taaA	GO:0003824 GO:0004556 GO:0005509 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0009277 GO:0016052 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030287 GO:0030428 GO:0031521 GO:0032163 GO:0043169 GO:0046872
18	0.06	0.295	6.70	0.04	0.56	4pk1A	GO:0007155 GO:0009279 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0019867 GO:0042802 GO:0043165 GO:0051205 GO:0071709 GO:1990063

Consensus prediction of GO terms

Molecular Function	GO:0030170	GO:0003824	GO:0030151
GO-Score	0.48	0.48	0.48
Biological Processes	GO:0044710	GO:0009636
GO-Score	0.36	0.36
Cellular Component	GO:0071944	GO:0005829
GO-Score	0.36	0.36

(a)	Cscore^GO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)	The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on Cscore^GO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1.	J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2.	J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.	A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.	Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.