Threading  Zmax  Znorm
MUSTER     5.42 0.94
dPPAS      8.66 0.93
wdPPAS     8.80 0.95
wMUSTER    5.99 1.03
wPPAS      8.46 1.21
dPPAS2     17.02 1.62
PPAS       8.33 1.19
Env-PPAS   7.54 0.94

==================================================================
|                  Estimated accuracy of your models             | 
==================================================================
                         Estimated        Clusters (N=15546)
                  ---------------------   ------------------
Model#  C-score    TM-score    RMSD (A)   #decoys    density
------  -------   ----------   --------   -------    -------
model1   -1.23    0.56+-0.15   6.5+-3.9    10610      0.265
model2   -4.01                               716      0.016
model3   -2.81                              2247      0.055
model4   -4.32                               367      0.012
model5   -4.07                               361      0.015


C-score is a confidence score of the I-TASSER predictions which
is typically in [-5,2]. TM-score and RMSD measure how close the
model is to the native structure and both are estimated based 
on the C-score. TM-score is in [0,1] with a value >0.5 implying 
the model of correct topology. The TM-score and RMSD estimations 
are made only for the first model because absolute values of 
TM-score and RMSD for the lower-rank models do not strongly 
correlate with the C-score. The models are ranked based on the 
structure density of I-TASSER simulations.

Please cite following articles when you use the I-TASSER Suite:

   1. Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.
      BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40 (2008).
   2. A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform
      for automated protein structure and function prediction.
      Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738 (2010).
   3. J Yang, A Roy, Y Zhang. Protein-ligand binding site recognition
      using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and
      sequence profile alignment. Bioinformatics, 29:2588-2595 (2013).