[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1829

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.06 3 4oz1A LYS Rep, Mult 58,106
20.04 2 1knyB KAN Rep, Mult 102,103,147,151
30.04 2 1t68X NO Rep, Mult 20,22,33
40.04 2 3wixC LC3 Rep, Mult 58,61,62,65,90,97,100,103,104,107,108,115
50.04 2 4kahA BYZ Rep, Mult 59,60
60.04 2 4r7cC GLY Rep, Mult 100,101,102
70.04 2 1cjyA CA Rep, Mult 79,86,88,99
80.03 1 1sj50 III Rep, Mult 54,55,56,57,58,60,61,63,64,67,68,86,95,97,98,99,100,103
90.02 1 2ih9A UUU Rep, Mult 86,88,90,97,99
100.02 1 1zxyD MG Rep, Mult 83,102
110.02 1 1iw7P MG Rep, Mult 105,109
120.02 1 4dwzB ZN Rep, Mult 143,147
130.02 1 4fc5F ZN Rep, Mult 147,150
140.02 1 1bjpA OXP Rep, Mult 85,100
150.02 1 1a1cB III Rep, Mult 35,39
160.02 1 2x5rA ZN Rep, Mult 58,92
170.02 1 1wuuB MG Rep, Mult 38,59

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601l9mB0.3935.270.0610.6952.3.2.13NA
20.0602j0kB0.4364.460.0330.6522.7.10.2NA
30.0602h6jH0.4005.320.0920.7073.4.25.1NA
40.0602j0mA0.3224.880.0250.5432.7.10.29,51
50.0601cjyA0.4315.720.0450.8293.1.1.4,3.1.1.5NA
60.0601aorB0.4025.390.0260.7441.2.7.5NA
70.0602j0lA0.3235.140.0630.5552.7.10.2NA
80.0602e7zA0.4125.430.0850.7444.2.1.71NA
90.0601qdbA0.4055.540.0550.7501.7.2.2111
100.0601tnzL0.4004.980.0220.6652.5.1.5936,86
110.0602zxcA0.3975.570.0210.7203.5.1.23NA
120.0602vn7A0.4005.060.0880.6523.2.1.324
130.0603hfaV0.4065.180.1150.7073.4.25.1NA
140.0602e8iA0.4065.350.0300.7263.5.1.4618
150.0602fp0B0.4005.330.0430.7133.2.1.143126
160.0602hfuA0.3995.370.0520.7072.7.1.36NA
170.0601gpeB0.4005.340.0760.7011.1.3.4152
180.0603f93A0.4145.710.0650.7933.2.1.-103
190.0601f13A0.3935.500.0270.7072.3.2.13NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.470.8250.770.330.841sj5A GO:0004518 GO:0090305
10.080.3416.250.060.732bneB GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006221 GO:0008152 GO:0009041 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0033862 GO:0042802 GO:0044210 GO:0046939
20.070.4385.200.080.764qurA GO:0005506 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016708 GO:0019439 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114
30.060.3275.530.040.604l9oA GO:0005634 GO:0005643 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0006810 GO:0012507 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016192 GO:0031410 GO:0051028
40.060.3066.030.030.633mx3A GO:0046872
50.060.3305.780.020.651uliC GO:0005506 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016708 GO:0018687 GO:0019439 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114
60.060.3465.820.070.673gkqA GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114
70.060.3015.960.050.603gl0C GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016708 GO:0019439 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114
80.060.4475.680.030.841itwA GO:0004450 GO:0005737 GO:0006097 GO:0006099 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
90.060.3295.700.050.635aeuA GO:0005506 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016708 GO:0018687 GO:0019439 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114
100.060.3175.630.040.591l1lA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004748 GO:0006260 GO:0008152 GO:0008998 GO:0016491 GO:0031419 GO:0055114
110.060.3435.830.050.661eg9A GO:0005506 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016708 GO:0018625 GO:0019439 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114
120.060.3325.150.070.592zylA GO:0005506 GO:0006629 GO:0006694 GO:0006707 GO:0008198 GO:0008202 GO:0009405 GO:0016042 GO:0016491 GO:0036200 GO:0046872 GO:0047086 GO:0050292 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114 GO:0070207 GO:0070723
130.060.3605.810.030.674pucB GO:0046872
140.060.3395.700.060.653en1A GO:0005506 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016708 GO:0018619 GO:0018624 GO:0019439 GO:0042184 GO:0042203 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114
150.060.3555.630.050.663gcfA GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114
160.060.4475.010.070.753n0qA GO:0005506 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016708 GO:0019439 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114
170.060.3596.060.080.732b1xA GO:0005506 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016708 GO:0019439 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114
180.060.3135.080.050.544qdfB GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004518
GO-Score 0.47
Biological Processes GO:0090305
GO-Score 0.47
Cellular Component GO:0005829 GO:0005643 GO:0005789 GO:0012507
GO-Score 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.