[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1824

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.19 14 3pfdA FDA Rep, Mult 29,32,35,36,84,85,89,90
20.07 5 2z1qA FAD Rep, Mult 25,42,44,78,79,80
30.03 2 1m9nA AMZ Rep, Mult 72,106,108
40.03 2 1egcC FAD Rep, Mult 29,34,36,37,81,82
50.03 2 1rx0A FAD Rep, Mult 37,40,80,81,83,96,98
60.01 1 1qwjC NCC Rep, Mult 72,115,116
70.01 1 2w0fC HX0 Rep, Mult 79,80,104,108
80.01 1 4zzcA XE Rep, Mult 18,48,51
90.01 1 5c65A 37X Rep, Mult 42,77
100.01 1 3mpjD FAD Rep, Mult 36,39,81,82,84
110.01 1 2jk5C L2C Rep, Mult 91,106
120.01 1 3rrpA LMR Rep, Mult 54,57,58,62,63,66
130.01 1 3qnqA CBS Rep, Mult 32,33,35
140.01 1 3r6vG ASP Rep, Mult 54,55,57,71
150.01 1 3s8gA OLC Rep, Mult 44,48,78,79,80
160.01 1 2a5vA SCN Rep, Mult 68,84
170.01 1 2bhwA CLA Rep, Mult 16,18

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601jqiA0.6583.000.0760.9091.3.99.2NA
20.0601k7wD0.6523.660.0920.9924.3.2.1NA
30.0601vdkA0.6693.580.0830.9924.2.1.2NA
40.0601h2rL0.6253.830.0920.9501.12.2.1NA
50.0601f1oA0.4663.790.0340.7114.3.2.2NA
60.0602ix6E0.6543.170.0920.9261.3.3.6104
70.0602pg0A0.6463.220.0930.9091.3.99.3NA
80.0601k62B0.6403.720.0670.9924.3.2.1NA
90.0601t9gC0.6542.990.0680.9091.3.99.3NA
100.0602pfmA0.6543.520.1000.9924.3.2.2NA
110.0602ohyB0.6483.580.0850.9755.4.3.6NA
120.0601h2aL0.6243.770.0840.9421.12.2.1NA
130.0601udyA0.6593.030.0670.9171.3.99.3NA
140.0601bucA0.6643.110.0850.9171.3.99.221
150.0601siqA0.6463.110.0590.9091.3.99.7NA
160.0602wbiB0.6663.040.1240.9261.3.99.-NA
170.0601u8vA0.6353.440.0990.9345.3.3.3NA
180.0601i0aA0.6403.800.0750.9924.3.2.1NA
190.0601bucB0.6693.200.1090.9261.3.99.294

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.240.6673.640.071.003r6qF GO:0003824 GO:0006099 GO:0006531 GO:0008797 GO:0016829
10.100.6753.630.100.991jswB GO:0003824 GO:0005829 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0006108 GO:0006531 GO:0008652 GO:0008797 GO:0016020 GO:0016829 GO:0051262
20.090.6863.460.110.994xydA GO:0004129 GO:0005506 GO:0009055 GO:0009060 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0016966 GO:0020037 GO:0055114 GO:0070469 GO:1902600
30.080.6204.020.050.995djqA GO:0004129 GO:0005506 GO:0005507 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006119 GO:0009055 GO:0009060 GO:0015078 GO:0015990 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0019411 GO:0019646 GO:0019825 GO:0020037 GO:0045154 GO:0045278 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070069 GO:0070469 GO:0070470 GO:1902600
40.070.6473.750.080.993ayfA GO:0004129 GO:0005506 GO:0009055 GO:0009060 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:1902600
50.070.6403.800.070.991i0aA GO:0003824 GO:0005212 GO:0042450
60.070.6053.970.110.992yevA GO:0004129 GO:0005506 GO:0005507 GO:0005886 GO:0006119 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0009055 GO:0009060 GO:0015002 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0022900 GO:0022904 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070469 GO:1902600
70.070.6763.480.060.983o0rB GO:0004129 GO:0005506 GO:0005886 GO:0009055 GO:0009060 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0016966 GO:0019333 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070469 GO:1902600
80.070.6643.600.131.004apbD GO:0003824 GO:0004333 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0006108 GO:0016829 GO:0040007 GO:0045239 GO:0051262
90.070.5893.650.110.924flcB GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0005829 GO:0006164 GO:0006167 GO:0006189 GO:0009152 GO:0009168 GO:0016829 GO:0044208 GO:0051262 GO:0070626
100.070.6193.880.070.993bhgA GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0006164 GO:0006188 GO:0006189 GO:0009152 GO:0016829 GO:0044208 GO:0070626
110.070.6663.700.071.003c8tA GO:0003824 GO:0016853 GO:0047472
120.060.6543.520.100.992pfmA GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0006164 GO:0006189 GO:0009152 GO:0016829 GO:0044208 GO:0070626
130.060.6323.820.120.982e9fB GO:0003824 GO:0004056 GO:0005737 GO:0006526 GO:0008652 GO:0016829 GO:0042450
140.060.6793.680.101.001yfeA GO:0003824 GO:0004333 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0006108 GO:0006979 GO:0008152 GO:0016829 GO:0045239 GO:0051262
150.060.5984.010.090.981tj7A GO:0003824 GO:0004056 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006526 GO:0008652 GO:0016829 GO:0042450 GO:0051262
160.060.6083.690.060.951q5nA GO:0003824 GO:0016853 GO:0019439 GO:0019619 GO:0042952 GO:0047472
170.060.6813.700.101.003tv2A GO:0003824 GO:0004333 GO:0005737 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0016829 GO:0045239
180.060.4663.790.030.711f1oA GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0006164 GO:0006167 GO:0006189 GO:0009152 GO:0016829 GO:0044208 GO:0051262 GO:0070626


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0046906 GO:0046914 GO:0016676 GO:0015078 GO:0015002 GO:0008797
GO-Score 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.32
Biological Processes GO:0098662 GO:0015992 GO:0006531 GO:0006099
GO-Score 0.44 0.44 0.32 0.32
Cellular Component GO:0031224
GO-Score 0.35

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.