[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1810

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 4 3pmdA 11A Rep, Mult 40,44,61,64,65,68,88,91,101
20.07 3 3eerA ZN Rep, Mult 69,109,110
30.04 2 3a44A ZN Rep, Mult 69,72
40.04 2 3fyeD HEA Rep, Mult 12,16
50.04 2 3sjqC PHU Rep, Mult 24,27
60.02 1 1un9A MG Rep, Mult 36,40
70.02 1 3b9mA SAL Rep, Mult 48,102
80.02 1 2cg5B COA Rep, Mult 41,42
90.02 1 3wmoP BCL Rep, Mult 29,30
100.02 1 1jb0L CLA Rep, Mult 44,68,69
110.02 1 2wssX III Rep, Mult 13,17
120.02 1 1trrB NUC Rep, Mult 54,57
130.02 1 2rh1A CLR Rep, Mult 27,44
140.02 1 1mz9A VDY Rep, Mult 3,6,17
150.02 1 2wi9A 1D2 Rep, Mult 65,101,104,105

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602q9fA0.6313.500.0780.9241.14.13.98NA
20.0601hbmA0.6073.450.0610.8982.8.4.1NA
30.0601lgfA0.6653.000.0700.9071.14.-.-41
40.0602zbzA0.6432.860.0790.8901.14.14.163
50.0603l4dB0.6083.570.0180.9071.14.13.70NA
60.0601w0eA0.6373.430.0710.9491.14.13.67,1.14.14.1NA
70.0601uedA0.6573.180.0880.9151.14.-.-109
80.0601n40A0.6163.130.0630.8731.14.-.-109
90.0601egyA0.6053.360.0860.9071.14.-.-NA
100.0602w0aA0.6083.340.0640.8981.14.13.70NA
110.0603ejbH0.6333.280.0260.8901.14.-.-111
120.0602wm4A0.6462.880.0780.8981.14.-.-63
130.0602z36B0.6283.450.0090.9151.-.-.-111
140.0602d09A0.6153.390.0700.9071.14.-.-NA
150.0603k9vA0.6123.590.0450.9491.14.13.-NA
160.0603e6iA0.6173.460.0360.9151.14.13.-NA
170.0603juvA0.6383.470.0630.9151.14.13.70100
180.0601oxaA0.6043.210.0090.8733.4.23.2379
190.0603gw9A0.5074.320.0610.8311.14.13.70NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.100.6073.470.050.932xbkA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
10.100.6263.230.040.914mm0B GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
20.090.6593.450.040.954l0eA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
30.090.6523.550.080.973hf2A GO:0003824 GO:0003958 GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016712 GO:0020037 GO:0042802 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070330
40.090.6213.280.040.895e58C GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016712 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
50.090.6383.470.060.923juvA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0005886 GO:0006629 GO:0006694 GO:0006695 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008398 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016125 GO:0016126 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0031090 GO:0033488 GO:0043231 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070988
60.080.5743.790.040.923zbyB GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
70.080.5204.550.090.903r9cA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070330
80.080.6393.130.030.913oftA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
90.080.6423.330.090.934j6cA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
100.080.6373.190.110.924z5pA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
110.080.6383.090.080.904oqrA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
120.080.6133.200.060.874i91A GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0006805 GO:0008202 GO:0008392 GO:0008395 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016712 GO:0017144 GO:0019373 GO:0019825 GO:0020037 GO:0031090 GO:0042180 GO:0042738 GO:0043231 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
130.080.6323.170.100.911gwiA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
140.080.6353.240.100.925hh3C GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
150.080.5453.570.090.852dkkA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0042440 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
160.080.6392.900.070.883bujA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
170.080.6273.580.080.933tbgA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0005739 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0006629 GO:0006805 GO:0008144 GO:0008202 GO:0008392 GO:0008395 GO:0009804 GO:0009820 GO:0009822 GO:0016020 GO:0016098 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016712 GO:0017144 GO:0019369 GO:0019825 GO:0020037 GO:0031090 GO:0033076 GO:0042737 GO:0043231 GO:0046483 GO:0046872 GO:0051100 GO:0055114 GO:0070330 GO:0070989 GO:0090350
180.080.6473.180.110.933tywD GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0005886 GO:0006707 GO:0008395 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0036199 GO:0046872 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005506 GO:0004497 GO:0016705 GO:0020037
GO-Score 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
Biological Processes GO:0055114
GO-Score 0.39
Cellular Component GO:0005737
GO-Score 0.09

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.