[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1769

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.63 66 2j66A PLP Rep, Mult 64,66,88,109,159,205,207,263,280,281,282,283,382
20.02 2 3wqeA MG Rep, Mult 66,380,382
30.01 1 3wqdA 999 Rep, Mult 66,166,207,213,380
40.01 1 4pb4A MG Rep, Mult 66,382

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.4502odoA0.6473.330.1500.7565.1.1.1166
20.4172dy3D0.6443.520.1400.7615.1.1.166,166
30.3071epvA0.6533.960.1390.7955.1.1.1166
40.2961xfcA0.6403.800.1480.7665.1.1.1166
50.1831tufA0.6893.570.1140.8024.1.1.2066
60.1072qghA0.6833.870.1130.8094.1.1.20NA
70.1062pljA0.6573.810.1510.7804.1.1.1766
80.1063c5qA0.6833.860.1130.8094.1.1.20164,262
90.0841f3tB0.6553.770.1260.7754.1.1.1766
100.0731vfsA0.6793.390.1550.7905.1.1.166,166
110.0652rjgA0.6423.560.1620.7585.1.1.166,166
120.0632vd8A0.6743.830.1550.8125.1.1.1166
130.0602p3eB0.6763.580.1170.7874.1.1.2066
140.0603n2bA0.6573.950.1010.7854.1.1.2064,66,214,262,282
150.0602yxxA0.6443.670.1200.7584.1.1.2066
160.0603hz3A0.4875.520.0480.6762.4.1.5NA
170.0603gwqA0.7353.550.1820.8584.3.1.1851,78
180.0602j66A0.6633.490.1410.7754.1.1.20NA
190.0601knwA0.6534.080.1090.7904.1.1.2066
200.0601hkvA0.6813.720.1360.8044.1.1.20NA
210.0601xc6A0.4815.340.0400.6573.2.1.23131
220.0601rcqA0.6463.360.1280.7565.1.1.1NA
230.0602nv9B0.6433.720.1200.7664.1.1.1966
240.0603bg3A0.4565.580.0610.6386.4.1.1NA
250.0603e5pB0.6453.710.1290.7705.1.1.1166
260.0603hurA0.5764.850.1190.7515.1.1.1166
270.0602epoA0.4665.610.0800.6503.2.1.52NA
280.0603cuzA0.4535.720.0720.6402.3.3.9NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.350.8202.360.150.884pb3B GO:0016829 GO:0016841 GO:0030170
10.260.7563.560.180.883gwqA GO:0008721 GO:0016829
20.200.6693.790.150.813ha1A GO:0003824 GO:0006522 GO:0008784 GO:0016853 GO:0030170 GO:0030632
30.190.6453.770.110.784eclA GO:0003824 GO:0006522 GO:0008784 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016747 GO:0016853 GO:0016855 GO:0030170 GO:0046677
40.160.6443.520.140.762dy3D GO:0003824 GO:0006522 GO:0008784 GO:0016853 GO:0030170 GO:0030632
50.060.3566.300.080.555fc1A GO:0004767 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0006685 GO:0008081 GO:0008270 GO:0009143 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0070062
60.060.2887.270.060.502oblA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006754 GO:0009058 GO:0016887 GO:0030254 GO:0030257 GO:0044780 GO:0046872 GO:0046961 GO:1902600
70.060.2966.540.070.452bkwA GO:0003824 GO:0006545 GO:0008453 GO:0008483 GO:0016740 GO:0019265
80.060.2717.100.040.455bufA GO:0003824 GO:0003866 GO:0004665 GO:0005737 GO:0006571 GO:0008652 GO:0008977 GO:0009073 GO:0009423 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0055114
90.060.2156.840.050.365hgcA GO:0005615
100.060.2336.900.060.383dyjA GO:0001726 GO:0003779 GO:0005178 GO:0005200 GO:0005737 GO:0005815 GO:0005856 GO:0005886 GO:0005925 GO:0007016 GO:0007044 GO:0007155 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0017166 GO:0030054 GO:0030274 GO:0030866 GO:0032403 GO:0032587 GO:0042995 GO:0051015 GO:0070062 GO:0070527
110.060.2056.070.080.314knpA GO:0003824 GO:0008152
120.060.2176.010.070.323qkaD GO:0003824 GO:0008152
130.060.2126.030.040.321yyfC GO:0004298 GO:0005737 GO:0005839 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009376 GO:0016787 GO:0030163 GO:0046872 GO:0051603
140.060.2026.100.050.313ty6A GO:0003824 GO:0004298 GO:0005737 GO:0005839 GO:0006508 GO:0008152 GO:0008233 GO:0009376 GO:0016787 GO:0030163 GO:0046872 GO:0051603
150.060.1804.600.080.233rfqC
160.060.2155.580.050.313p2tA GO:0002250 GO:0002376 GO:0003823 GO:0004872 GO:0005886 GO:0007165 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0045671 GO:0070062 GO:1902894
170.060.1564.800.040.211nogA
180.060.1244.000.020.152wscK GO:0009507 GO:0009522 GO:0009535 GO:0009536 GO:0009579 GO:0015979 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016168


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0030170 GO:0008784 GO:0016746 GO:0016841
GO-Score 0.65 0.46 0.37 0.35
Biological Processes GO:0042221 GO:0030632
GO-Score 0.37 0.33
Cellular Component GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.19

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.