[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1754c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.04 2 4yhoL 4CC Rep, Mult 40,97,99
20.04 2 1pjxA MXE Rep, Mult 463,464
30.02 1 5drkA BCT Rep, Mult 67,68
40.02 1 4ac1X NAG Rep, Mult 450,453,454
50.02 1 3cmvE ANP Rep, Mult 160,161,162,220
60.02 1 2bf6A CA Rep, Mult 457,458,513
70.02 1 4j6rL CA Rep, Mult 130,198
80.02 1 2atpB III Rep, Mult 6,8,29,105
90.02 1 1nhcC SO4 Rep, Mult 271,272,273,308
100.02 1 3cmvB ANP Rep, Mult 68,83,85,112
110.02 1 1z1nX ZN Rep, Mult 353,358
120.02 1 3lxvN CO3 Rep, Mult 360,362
130.02 1 3g31B GF1 Rep, Mult 41,42
140.02 1 2zkrq NUC Rep, Mult 142,143
150.02 1 3ubeC GAL Rep, Mult 33,36
160.02 1 1h9wA MN Rep, Mult 460,484,535
170.02 1 4cuyU III Rep, Mult 150,156
180.02 1 1htwA MG Rep, Mult 268,269
190.02 1 1hn1B NA Rep, Mult 200,203,218
200.02 1 1nipA MG Rep, Mult 243,245

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601f13A0.2997.230.0450.4652.3.2.13NA
20.0602pffA0.3077.810.0520.5082.3.1.41,2.3.1.86NA
30.0601zvuA0.3167.430.0320.5065.99.1.-NA
40.0602e28A0.2997.430.0410.4762.7.1.40194
50.0603ecqB0.3287.950.0390.5493.2.1.97195,199
60.0603btaA0.3568.270.0460.6183.4.24.69NA
70.0602np0A0.3638.300.0360.6393.4.24.69NA
80.0601z0hB0.2147.120.0370.3303.4.24.69NA
90.0602fhbA0.3567.070.0480.5473.2.1.41NA
100.0601llwA0.3137.770.0480.5111.4.7.1NA
110.0602qf7A0.3087.730.0240.4996.4.1.1NA
120.0603iydC0.3088.110.0600.5202.7.7.692
130.0602hpiA0.3138.040.0350.5332.7.7.7141
140.0602fhcA0.3537.170.0660.5453.2.1.4170
150.0602pffB0.3538.070.0710.5932.3.1.86243,278
160.0603lxuX0.3256.990.0250.4873.4.14.10222,239
170.0601f1sA0.2968.190.0620.5104.2.2.1NA
180.0601yq2A0.3187.790.0300.5263.2.1.23NA
190.0601w36C0.2907.960.0470.4943.1.11.5244

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.150.7754.330.090.933chnS GO:0001580 GO:0001792 GO:0001895 GO:0002415 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0007173 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0038093 GO:0043113 GO:0043235 GO:0070062
10.060.2997.640.040.483dmkA GO:0003823 GO:0005887 GO:0006909 GO:0007411 GO:0007413 GO:0007419 GO:0007422 GO:0008046 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016319 GO:0021551 GO:0030424 GO:0030425 GO:0032490 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043005 GO:0043025 GO:0048666 GO:0048814 GO:0048846 GO:0050770 GO:0050976 GO:0070593
20.060.2627.750.040.423b43A
30.060.2337.270.060.362v5yA GO:0001937 GO:0004721 GO:0004725 GO:0005001 GO:0005737 GO:0005887 GO:0005911 GO:0005913 GO:0006470 GO:0007155 GO:0007156 GO:0007165 GO:0010596 GO:0010842 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016311 GO:0016525 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0030027 GO:0031175 GO:0031290 GO:0035335 GO:0042493 GO:0042802 GO:0045296 GO:0045909 GO:0048471
40.060.2574.520.070.313ghbH
50.060.2514.520.040.302ig2H GO:0003823 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0005886 GO:0006508 GO:0006898 GO:0006955 GO:0006956 GO:0006958 GO:0038095 GO:0038096 GO:0050776 GO:0070062
60.060.2514.660.050.311ynkH
70.060.2484.360.050.301indH
80.060.2484.430.040.302x7lB
90.060.2434.750.030.303mnvA
100.060.2464.740.040.312oz4L
110.060.2394.210.050.283p30H
120.060.2484.600.030.301gpoM GO:0003823 GO:0005886 GO:0006910 GO:0006911 GO:0006958 GO:0009897 GO:0030183 GO:0034987 GO:0042571 GO:0042742 GO:0045087 GO:0050853 GO:0050871 GO:0072562
130.060.2454.660.050.303clfH
140.060.2494.560.040.303m8oL
150.060.2566.640.040.382jllA GO:0005886 GO:0007155 GO:0007158 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030424
160.060.2464.610.050.303mlrH
170.060.2424.540.050.291e4xI
180.060.2374.500.050.293fmgH


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0001792 GO:0008046 GO:0003823 GO:0042803 GO:0045296 GO:0005001
GO-Score 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Biological Processes GO:0001580 GO:0043113 GO:0007173 GO:0001895 GO:0038093 GO:0002415 GO:0032490 GO:0048814 GO:0007419 GO:0050770 GO:0007413 GO:0021551 GO:0048846 GO:0016319 GO:0006909 GO:0007422 GO:0050976 GO:0070593 GO:0035335 GO:0042493 GO:0045909 GO:0001937 GO:0007156 GO:0010596 GO:0010842 GO:0031290 GO:0016525
GO-Score 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Cellular Component GO:0031226
GO-Score 0.50

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.