[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1734c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 1 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.30 19 2ii5A CO6 Rep, Mult 3,5,6,27,28,29
20.21 20 1q23K FUA Rep, Mult 2,12,14,16,18,23
30.08 7 3u9fK CLM Rep, Mult 54
40.07 4 2xr7A MLC Rep, Mult 51,58,59,60,61
50.01 1 1xl8B MPD Rep, Mult 48,50,66,69,70
60.01 1 3kziT CLA Rep, Mult 65,69

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601xl7A0.5232.670.1000.7502.3.1.13749,62
20.0602ii4A0.8881.260.2131.0002.3.1.16815,18
30.06011asA0.5163.710.0420.9006.3.1.1NA
40.0603errA0.5323.790.1040.9386.1.1.1158
50.0601b5sA0.8951.200.2501.0002.3.1.122
60.0601b5sE0.8951.200.2501.0002.3.1.122,16,22,50
70.0602debA0.5292.480.0830.7502.3.1.21NA
80.0602eabA0.5383.480.0630.8503.2.1.63NA
90.0601xl7B0.5532.700.0790.7622.3.1.137NA
100.0602zr3B0.5333.460.0800.9006.1.1.1124,52
110.0603g98A0.5642.630.0460.7626.1.1.752
120.0601serB0.5263.580.0760.9126.1.1.1158
130.0601ciaA0.6682.280.1160.8632.3.1.28NA
140.0601sczA0.9271.190.2621.0002.3.1.612
150.0601q6xA0.5212.660.0820.7382.3.1.6NA
160.0601q23B0.6772.310.0870.8632.3.1.28NA
170.0601ua4A0.5322.310.1020.7252.7.1.147NA
180.0601b76A0.5183.440.0550.8636.1.1.14NA
190.0602ddmB0.5173.590.0600.8252.7.1.35NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.260.9560.720.261.003l60A GO:0004739 GO:0005618 GO:0005886 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0043754
10.240.9241.180.241.003maeB GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
20.220.8961.080.200.994n72C GO:0004742 GO:0006090 GO:0006096 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0045254
30.220.8951.200.251.001b5sA GO:0004742 GO:0006096 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
40.210.9271.190.261.001sczA GO:0004149 GO:0005829 GO:0006099 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0031405 GO:0033512 GO:0045252
50.210.8811.320.211.002ihwA GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0031625 GO:0042645 GO:0043754
60.210.8971.220.161.001dpbA GO:0004742 GO:0006096 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0045254
70.160.8011.230.210.903rqcC GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0042802
80.080.6712.540.230.933b8kA GO:0004742 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0005967 GO:0005975 GO:0006006 GO:0006086 GO:0006090 GO:0006099 GO:0008152 GO:0010510 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0030431 GO:0034604 GO:0043209 GO:0045254 GO:0046487
90.080.6521.640.160.762xt6A GO:0003824 GO:0004149 GO:0004591 GO:0006099 GO:0008152 GO:0008683 GO:0016491 GO:0016624 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016829 GO:0016831 GO:0030976 GO:0046872 GO:0050439 GO:0055114
100.060.3833.620.090.642z0sA GO:0000178 GO:0003676 GO:0003723 GO:0005737 GO:0006401 GO:0008143
110.060.3713.860.050.685dmnA GO:0006974 GO:0008168 GO:0008652 GO:0008898 GO:0009086 GO:0016740 GO:0032259 GO:0033477 GO:0046872
120.060.3704.260.130.784knsA GO:0005507 GO:0006807 GO:0046872 GO:0050421 GO:0055114
130.060.3874.050.040.643sdsB GO:0004585 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0006520 GO:0006526 GO:0006591 GO:0008652 GO:0016597 GO:0016740 GO:0016743 GO:0042450
140.060.3814.370.070.744ayiD GO:0016021
150.060.3523.970.000.641yz4A GO:0004721 GO:0004725 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0006470 GO:0007179 GO:0008138 GO:0016020 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0035335 GO:0042127 GO:0046330
160.060.3943.780.070.722f6kA GO:0016787 GO:0046872
170.060.3714.300.090.615ahwB GO:0000166 GO:0006950
180.060.3484.500.030.601p32A GO:0000122 GO:0001849 GO:0002250 GO:0002376 GO:0003714 GO:0003729 GO:0005080 GO:0005540 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0005634 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006397 GO:0006915 GO:0006955 GO:0006958 GO:0007597 GO:0008134 GO:0008380 GO:0009986 GO:0014065 GO:0016020 GO:0016032 GO:0030449 GO:0030984 GO:0031690 GO:0032689 GO:0032695 GO:0039534 GO:0039536 GO:0042254 GO:0042256 GO:0043065 GO:0045087 GO:0045785 GO:0048025 GO:0050687 GO:0051897 GO:0070131 GO:0090023 GO:0097177 GO:1900026 GO:1901165 GO:2000510


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016624 GO:0004738 GO:0016751 GO:0005504 GO:0050662 GO:0004742
GO-Score 0.52 0.52 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.39
Biological Processes GO:0009060 GO:0019474 GO:0006096
GO-Score 0.42 0.42 0.39
Cellular Component GO:0030312 GO:1990234 GO:0045240 GO:0016020
GO-Score 0.52 0.42 0.42 0.39

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.