I-TASSER results

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1719

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>protein (259 residues)
MSAEEQDTRSGGIQVIARAAELLRVLQAHPGGLSQAEIGERVGMARSTVSRILNALEDEG
LVASRGARGPYRLGPEITRMATTVRLGVVTEMHPFLTELSRELDETVDLSILDGDRADVV
DQVVPPQRLRAVSAVGESFPLYCCANGKALLAALPPERQARALPSRLAPLTANTITDRAA
LRDELNRIRVDGVAYDREEQTEGICAVGAVLRGVSVELVAVSVPVPAQRFYGREAELAGA
LLAWVSKVDAWFNGTEDRK

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSAEEQDTRSGGIQVIARAAELLRVLQAHPGGLSQAEIGERVGMARSTVSRILNALEDEGLVASRGARGPYRLGPEITRMATTVRLGVVTEMHPFLTELSRELDETVDLSILDGDRADVVDQVVPPQRLRAVSAVGESFPLYCCANGKALLAALPPERQARALPSRLAPLTANTITDRAALRDELNRIRVDGVAYDREEQTEGICAVGAVLRGVSVELVAVSVPVPAQRFYGREAELAGALLAWVSKVDAWFNGTEDRK
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCCCEEEHCHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEEEEEHCCEEEEEEEHCCCCCEEEHCCCCCEHCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEHCCCCCCCEEEEEEEHCCCCCCEEEEEEEEHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCC
Conf.Score	9887888888885499999999999995899878999999999998999999999999999798589996887389999999975759999999999999998996898998799999999857898678875788576675658999998689999999999879888899889999999999999999897665676778857899866589997899998764667998999999999999999999989998889
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSAEEQDTRSGGIQVIARAAELLRVLQAHPGGLSQAEIGERVGMARSTVSRILNALEDEGLVASRGARGPYRLGPEITRMATTVRLGVVTEMHPFLTELSRELDETVDLSILDGDRADVVDQVVPPQRLRAVSAVGESFPLYCCANGKALLAALPPERQARALPSRLAPLTANTITDRAALRDELNRIRVDGVAYDREEQTEGICAVGAVLRGVSVELVAVSVPVPAQRFYGREAELAGALLAWVSKVDAWFNGTEDRK
Prediction	8556678776330300120030240027465402012005427143110211020425341032247643210000002003312330241033235542641411013022464200000204063302021304320201000001002022366203511656046216421242630372355027423022330323100000001235723000000001131046524510530260044006414436768
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Normalized B-facotr

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. (Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)

Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
Hit

Iden1

Iden2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
Align.

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

Sec.Str
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCCCEEEHCHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEEEEEHCCEEEEEEEHCCCCCEEEHCCCCCEHCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEHCCCCCCCEEEEEEEHCCCCCCEEEEEEEEHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCC
MSAEEQDTRSGGIQVIARAAELLRVLQAHPGGLSQAEIGERVGMARSTVSRILNALEDEGLVASRGARGPYRLGPEITRMATTVRLGVVTEMHPFLTELSRELDETVDLSILDGDRADVVDQVVPPQRLRAVSAVGESFPLYCCANGKALLAALPPERQARALPSRLAPLTANTITDRAALRDELNRIRVDGVAYDREEQTEGICAVGAVLRGVSVELVAVSVPVPAQRFYGREAELAGALLAWVSKVDAWFNGTEDRK

5tjjA

0.26

0.25

0.95

3.91

MUSTER

---------DYQVPSVALAARVLKLLSRHKRQSTLTEIAERLGVNKTTCLRVLRTLEREDFVSYDPQSRRYSLGPYLIPLGARAADDVYAHALAELHQVAAHTGTAVLVKRLRDDRVIYIGSAEPPGGVRIAVSVGQQFPVYGAAFGRCFLAYDDESTWRRVLREGLKAYTPNSITDEEEYVRLLQEVREKGYAVSHGELWPGISAVAVPVFNQQNKDLVLSCLTTSVIQGEDVERAVKALKESAAKVSAWSGYQ----

5tjjA

0.26

0.24

0.95

7.17

dPPAS

---------DYQVPSVALAARVLKLLSHKYRQSTLTEIAERLGVNKTTCLRVLRTLEREDFVSYDPQSRRYSLGPYLIPLGARAADDVYAHALAELHQVAAHTGTAVLVKRLRDDRVIYIGSAEPPDGVRIAVSVGQQFPVYGAAFGRCFLAYDDESTWRRVLREGLKAYTPNSITDEEEYVRLLQEVREKGYAVSHGELWPGISAVAVPVFNQQNKDLVLSCLTTSVIQGEDVERAVKALKESAAKVSAWSGYQ----

5tjjA

0.26

0.24

0.95

6.71

wdPPAS

---------DYQVPSVALAARVLKLLSHKYRQSTLTEIAERLGVNKTTCLRVLRTLEREDFVSYDPQSRRYSLGPYLIPLGARAADDVYAHALAELHQVAAHTGTAVLVKRLRDDRVIYIGSAEPPDGVRIAVSVGQQFPVYGAAFGRCFLAYDDESTWRRVLREGLKAYTPNSITDEEEYVRLLQEVREKGYAVSHGELWPGISAVAVPVFNQQNKDLVLSCLTTSVIQGEDVERAVKALKESAAKVSAWSGYQ----

2xrnA

0.38

0.35

0.92

4.62

wMUSTER

-------------QVIARAASIMRALGSHPHGLSLAAIAQLVGLPRSTVQRIINALEEEFLVEALGPAGGFRLGPALGQLINQAQTDILSLVKPYLRSLAEELDESVSLASLAGDKIYVLDRIVSERELRVVFPIGINVPAAATAAGKVLLAALPDETLQAALGEQLPVLTSNTLG-RKALVKQLSEVRQSGVASDLDEHIDGVSSFATLLDTYLG-YYSLAIVMPSSRASKQSDLIKKALLQSKLNIERAIG-----R

5tjjA

0.26

0.25

0.95

4.84

wPPAS

---------DYQVPSVALAARVLKLLSRHKRQSTLTEIAERLGVNKTTCLRVLRTLEREDFVSYDPQSRRYSLGPYLIPLGARAADDVYAHALAELHQVAAHTGTAVLVKRLRDDRVIYIGSAEPPDGVRIAVSVGQQFPVYGAAFGRCFLAYDDESTWRRVLREGLKAYTPNSITDEEEYVRLLQEVREKGYAVSHGELWPGISAVAVPVFNQQNKDLVLSCLTTSVIQGEDVERAVKALKESAAKVSAWSGYQ----

5tjjA

0.26

0.24

0.95

7.00

dPPAS2

---------DYQVPSVALAARVLKLLSHKYRQSTLTEIAERLGVNKTTCLRVLRTLEREDFVSYDPQSRRYSLGPYLIPLGARAADDVYAHALAELHQVAAHTGTAVLVKRLRDDRVIYIGSAEPPDGVRIAVSVGQQFPVYGAAFGRCFLAYDDESTWRRVLREGLKAYTPNSITDEEEYVRLLQEVREKGYAVSHGELWPGISAVAVPVFNQQNKDLVLSCLTTSVIQGEDVERAVKALKESAAKVSAWSGYQ----

5tjjA

0.26

0.25

0.95

4.43

PPAS

---------DYQVPSVALAARVLKLLSRHKRQSTLTEIAERLGVNKTTCLRVLRTLEREDFVSYDPQSRRYSLGPYLIPLGARAADDVYAHALAELHQVAAHTGTAVLVKRLRDDRVIYIGSAEPPDGVRIAVSVGQQFPVYGAAFGRCFLAYDDESTWRRVLREGLKAYTPNSITDEEEYVRLLQEVREKGYAVSHGELWPGISAVAVPVFNQQNKDLVLSCLTTSVIQGEDVERAVKALKESAAKVSAWSGYQ----

5tjjA

0.26

0.25

0.95

6.30

Env-PPAS

---------DYQVPSVALAARVLKLLSRHKRQSTLTEIAERLGVNKTTCLRVLRTLEREDFVSYDPQSRRYSLGPYLIPLGARAADDVYAHALAELHQVAAHTGTAVLVKRLRDDRVIYIGSAEPPDGVRIAVSVGQQFPVYGAAFGRCFLAYDDESTWRRVLREGLKAYTPNSITDEEEYVRLLQEVREKGYAVSHGELWPGISAVAVPVFNQQNKDLVLSCLTTSVIQGEDVERAVKALKESAAKVSAWSGYQ----

2xrnA

0.38

0.35

0.92

3.91

MUSTER

-------------QVIARAASIMRALGSHPHGLSLAAIAQLVGLPRSTVQRIINALEEEFLVEALGPAGGFRLGPALGQLINQAQTDILSLVKPYLRSLAEELDESVSLASLAGDKIYVLDRIVSERELRVVFPIGINVPAAATAAGKVLLAALPDETLQAALGEQLPVLTSNTLG-RKALVKQLSEVRQSGVASDLDEHIDGVSSFATLLDTYLG-YYSLAIVMPSSRASKQSDLIKKALLQSKLNIERAIGR-----

2xrnA

0.38

0.35

0.92

6.90

dPPAS

-------------QVIARAASIMRALGSHPHGLSLAAIAQLVGLPRSTVQRIINALEEEFLVEALGPAGGFRLGPALGQLINQAQTDILSLVKPYLRSLAEELDESVSLASLAGDKIYVLDRIVSERELRVVFPIGINVPAAATAAGKVLLAALPDETLQAALGEQLPVLTSNTLG-RKALVKQLSEVRQSGVASDLDEHIDGVSSFATLLDTYLG-YYSLAIVMPSSRASKQSDLIKKALLQSKLNIERAIGR-----

(a)	Iden1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	Iden2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment.
(e)	Download Align. list the threading program used to identify the template provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates.

Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)

More about C-score

Local structure accuracy of first model

Download Model 1

C-score=1.10

Estimated TM-score = 0.86±0.07

Estimated RMSD = 3.7±2.5Å

Download Model 2

C-score=-1.01

Download Model 3

C-score=-2.05

Download Model 4

C-score=-2.89

Download Model 5

C-score=0.47

Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)

Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov
1	5tjjA	0.916	1.14	0.257	0.946
2	3r4kA	0.757	3.26	0.224	0.930
3	3mq0A	0.688	3.91	0.162	0.865
4	2ia2A	0.666	4.12	0.209	0.861
5	2xrnA	0.599	2.36	0.230	0.656
6	2o9aA	0.598	2.10	0.254	0.656
7	1ysqA	0.598	2.02	0.269	0.652
8	1mkmB	0.597	1.87	0.194	0.645
9	1tf1A	0.594	2.11	0.210	0.652
10	2g7uA	0.586	3.01	0.181	0.679

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

Ligand binding sites

Rank	C-score	Cluster size	PDB Hit	Lig Name	Download Complex	Ligand Binding Site Residues
1	0.63	18	2o9aD	PYR	Rep, Mult	139,144,145,146,196,204,206,222,224
2	0.02	1	2xroB	NUC	Rep, Mult	13,14,15,34,35,36,46,50,69,70,71
3	0.02	1	2xroA	NUC	Rep, Mult	15,18,45,47,48,51
4	0.02	1	2o9a0	III	Rep, Mult	129,131,132,133,200,203,204,225,226,228
5	0.02	1	1s0vC	APC	Rep, Mult	46,50,51,54,55
6	0.02	1	2ia20	III	Rep, Mult	12,13,15,16,17,19,20,23,24,26,31,51,55,56,58,59,61,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,83,84,85,86,87

	Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
	Download the templates clustering results.
(a)	C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)	Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)	Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)	Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column. Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	EC Number	Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1kzhB	0.411	6.27	0.066	0.738	2.7.1.90	NA
2	0.060	1xdpA	0.431	5.76	0.065	0.691	2.7.4.1	NA
3	0.060	3c39A	0.411	6.31	0.044	0.734	2.7.2.3	NA
4	0.060	13pkA	0.401	6.38	0.052	0.710	2.7.2.3	NA
5	0.060	3d64B	0.432	5.78	0.076	0.710	3.3.1.1	89,101,121,127
6	0.060	3dwbA	0.409	5.78	0.049	0.664	3.4.24.71	NA
7	0.060	2zmfB	0.395	3.83	0.041	0.494	3.1.4.17	109,250
8	0.060	3eqvA	0.422	5.39	0.040	0.637	3.4.16.4	NA
9	0.060	2o9bA	0.426	4.47	0.063	0.568	2.7.13.3	152,218
10	0.060	2vpiA	0.217	6.52	0.065	0.394	6.3.5.2	NA
11	0.060	2f48B	0.406	6.61	0.073	0.764	2.7.1.90	NA
12	0.060	2ywcA	0.411	6.18	0.097	0.699	6.3.5.2	NA
13	0.060	1k87A	0.469	6.17	0.056	0.803	1.5.99.8	203
14	0.060	3c46B	0.385	6.03	0.068	0.660	2.7.7.6	184
15	0.060	2vlcA	0.408	6.16	0.047	0.703	3.2.2.22	21,24
16	0.060	3hsiB	0.411	6.56	0.063	0.753	2.7.8.8	NA
17	0.060	3fwlA	0.433	5.69	0.048	0.710	2.4.1.129	NA
18	0.060	3c2wC	0.412	4.52	0.104	0.560	2.7.13.3	115
19	0.060	2vumA	0.408	6.12	0.050	0.699	2.7.7.6	NA

(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Rank	Cscore^GO	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	PDB Hit	Associated GO Terms
Homologous GO templates in PDB
0	0.36	0.599	2.35	0.23	0.66	2xrnB	GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
1	0.31	0.531	2.55	0.22	0.59	3bjnA	GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892
2	0.30	0.597	1.87	0.19	0.64	1mkmB	GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892
3	0.30	0.729	3.64	0.19	0.91	3mq0B	GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
4	0.28	0.769	3.23	0.21	0.94	3r4kA	GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
5	0.26	0.598	2.02	0.27	0.65	1ysqA	GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892
6	0.26	0.594	2.11	0.21	0.65	1tf1A	GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005829 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006974 GO:0042802 GO:0045892
7	0.25	0.600	1.98	0.26	0.65	2o99C	GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005829 GO:0006097 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892
8	0.23	0.675	4.16	0.20	0.88	2ia2A	GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045893 GO:0046278
9	0.21	0.550	2.88	0.15	0.63	2o0yC	GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
10	0.21	0.565	2.06	0.28	0.62	1yspA	GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005829 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892
11	0.18	0.571	2.39	0.19	0.64	3obfA	GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
12	0.14	0.563	2.92	0.12	0.66	3d3oA	GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
13	0.07	0.598	3.08	0.17	0.69	2g7uA	GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045893 GO:0046278
14	0.06	0.354	6.46	0.08	0.64	2i3aD	GO:0003942 GO:0005737 GO:0006526 GO:0008652 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0040007 GO:0046983 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:0070401
15	0.06	0.325	5.71	0.07	0.54	4b3iD	GO:0003824 GO:0005618 GO:0005886 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
16	0.06	0.331	6.12	0.05	0.57	2fp9A	GO:0005773 GO:0009058 GO:0009820 GO:0016829 GO:0016844
17	0.06	0.231	5.70	0.03	0.38	5h9mA	GO:0000209 GO:0003714 GO:0004842 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005769 GO:0005829 GO:0006511 GO:0006915 GO:0007049 GO:0007264 GO:0007275 GO:0007411 GO:0008270 GO:0016567 GO:0016874 GO:0031396 GO:0031624 GO:0042787 GO:0043005 GO:0043025 GO:0043066 GO:0043154 GO:0043161 GO:0043231 GO:0044257 GO:0044267 GO:0046872 GO:0061630 GO:0090090 GO:1903507 GO:2001237
18	0.06	0.181	3.46	0.04	0.23	3cbrB	GO:0001523 GO:0005179 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0005737 GO:0006810 GO:0030198 GO:0042562 GO:0042572 GO:0042802 GO:0043234 GO:0044267 GO:0046982 GO:0070062
19	0.06	0.177	4.47	0.04	0.24	2r4hC	GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0005911 GO:0005912 GO:0005923 GO:0006461 GO:0007155 GO:0007166 GO:0008022 GO:0016020 GO:0030054 GO:0032947 GO:0042995 GO:0051393 GO:0070997
20	0.06	0.176	4.45	0.05	0.24	1wfvA	GO:0002092 GO:0003402 GO:0004871 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005768 GO:0005770 GO:0005886 GO:0005923 GO:0007165 GO:0007399 GO:0008285 GO:0010976 GO:0014069 GO:0016020 GO:0019902 GO:0030054 GO:0030159 GO:0030336 GO:0030425 GO:0031697 GO:0032516 GO:0032926 GO:0032947 GO:0036057 GO:0038180 GO:0043005 GO:0043113 GO:0043234 GO:0045202 GO:0046332 GO:0048471 GO:0051291 GO:0051898 GO:0060395 GO:0070699 GO:0071850 GO:0072015 GO:0097118 GO:1990090 GO:2000809

Consensus prediction of GO terms

Molecular Function	GO:0003677	GO:0003700
GO-Score	0.84	0.52
Biological Processes	GO:0045892
GO-Score	0.52
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)	Cscore^GO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)	The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on Cscore^GO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1.	J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2.	J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.	A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.	Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.