[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1693

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.11 82 3wmmW CRT Rep, Mult 38,41,44,45,48,51,52
20.11 81 4ub6X CLA Rep, Mult 37,39,40,41,43,44,46
30.08 51 4pj0h CLA Rep, Mult 44,47,48,51,52
40.07 49 3d5d2 MG Rep, Mult 52,53,54,55,56,57
50.07 48 2fkwM BCL Rep, Mult 46,49,50,53,54,57
60.07 48 7insF UNK Rep, Mult 42,43,46,47
70.05 43 4n3eX 2AN Rep, Mult 45,46,49
80.03 24 4i7zF OZ2 Rep, Mult 37,38,41,42
90.01 11 2e75E OPC Rep, Mult 36,37,40,41
100.01 7 3gs2A III Rep, Mult 55,56,57,58
110.00 1 2wdrC PCI Rep, Mult 10,13,14,17
120.00 1 3op0A NA Rep, Mult 13,16,17,46

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601crkA0.6052.800.1300.8972.7.3.2NA
20.0602irpA0.6183.250.0700.9484.2.1.109NA
30.0602pnrF0.5882.780.0350.9662.7.11.2NA
40.0602i2xA0.6082.950.0710.9482.1.1.9010
50.0601dofA0.7372.160.1031.0004.3.2.2NA
60.0602ix6E0.6332.140.0190.9311.3.3.6NA
70.0602idxC0.6042.650.0700.8452.5.1.17NA
80.0602hvgA0.4303.090.1110.8624.3.2.233,35
90.0601xmeA0.6063.000.1050.9831.9.3.140
100.0602pg0A0.6152.420.0770.8971.3.99.325
110.0601y8pA0.6082.590.0360.9662.7.11.246
120.0602htnG0.4853.060.1400.7591.16.3.1NA
130.0601bucA0.6172.370.0570.8971.3.99.2NA
140.0601udyA0.6222.650.0560.9311.3.99.326
150.0602fenD0.6542.370.1551.0005.5.1.2NA
160.0602jifA0.6062.500.0570.9141.3.99.-NA
170.0602ix6A0.6332.140.0190.9311.3.3.6NA
180.0601bucB0.6212.720.0861.0001.3.99.237,46,49
190.0603ju5C0.6112.980.1320.9142.7.3.3NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.140.7372.160.101.001dofA GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0006163 GO:0009152 GO:0016829 GO:0051262 GO:0070626
10.140.6322.620.091.001yisA GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0006163 GO:0006164 GO:0006189 GO:0016829 GO:0044208 GO:0051262 GO:0070626
20.130.4732.450.030.643rd8A GO:0003824 GO:0004333 GO:0005737 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0016829 GO:0045239
30.130.3903.030.120.741yfeA GO:0003824 GO:0004333 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0006108 GO:0006979 GO:0008152 GO:0016829 GO:0045239 GO:0051262
40.130.4283.270.080.764apbD GO:0003824 GO:0004333 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0006108 GO:0016829 GO:0040007 GO:0045239 GO:0051262
50.130.6722.290.101.001re5D GO:0003824 GO:0016853 GO:0019619 GO:0047472
60.120.5583.140.100.972pfmA GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0006164 GO:0006189 GO:0009152 GO:0016829 GO:0044208 GO:0070626
70.120.4463.040.060.762x75A GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0006164 GO:0006189 GO:0009152 GO:0016829 GO:0044208 GO:0070626
80.110.4243.300.070.843gzhA GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0006164 GO:0006188 GO:0006189 GO:0009152 GO:0016829 GO:0044208 GO:0070626
90.110.4922.350.100.671vdkA GO:0003824 GO:0004333 GO:0005737 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0016829 GO:0045239
100.110.4742.520.030.661yfmA GO:0003824 GO:0004333 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0006108 GO:0016829 GO:0045239 GO:0051262
110.110.5003.230.070.904efcA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0006163 GO:0006164 GO:0006188 GO:0006189 GO:0009152 GO:0016829 GO:0044208 GO:0046872 GO:0051262 GO:0070626
120.110.4232.840.100.741jswB GO:0003824 GO:0005829 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0006108 GO:0006531 GO:0008652 GO:0008797 GO:0016020 GO:0016829 GO:0051262
130.110.6542.370.151.002fenD GO:0003824 GO:0016853 GO:0019619 GO:0047472
140.100.4052.900.060.713e04D GO:0003824 GO:0004333 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0006099 GO:0006106 GO:0006108 GO:0016829 GO:0045239 GO:0048873 GO:0051262 GO:0070062
150.100.4652.970.070.674flcB GO:0003824 GO:0004018 GO:0005829 GO:0006164 GO:0006167 GO:0006189 GO:0009152 GO:0009168 GO:0016829 GO:0044208 GO:0051262 GO:0070626
160.100.7122.210.141.003c8tA GO:0003824 GO:0016853 GO:0047472
170.100.7252.060.071.004amqA GO:0019012
180.100.4413.660.070.671tj7A GO:0003824 GO:0004056 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006526 GO:0008652 GO:0016829 GO:0042450 GO:0051262


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016842 GO:0004333
GO-Score 0.52 0.35
Biological Processes GO:0009117 GO:0072521 GO:0051262 GO:0006106 GO:0006099
GO-Score 0.52 0.52 0.44 0.35 0.35
Cellular Component GO:0045239
GO-Score 0.35

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.