[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1571

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.25 7 4qakB 2AM Rep, Mult 4,39,41,44,123,125,128
20.12 4 2vfkA AMP Rep, Mult 41,75,121,123,125
30.06 2 2vfkA AMP Rep, Mult 41,75,118,119,121,123,125
40.06 2 1jh7A UVC Rep, Mult 18,34,37,38
50.03 1 1fsiA SO4 Rep, Mult 71,73,74,139
60.03 1 2ehzA MCT Rep, Mult 72,84,85,86

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603e2dA0.4165.240.0360.7223.1.3.1137
20.0602veoB0.3995.000.0790.6693.1.1.395
30.0601zefA0.4044.950.0360.6753.1.3.1106
40.0601cjxA0.4255.090.0550.7511.13.11.27NA
50.0601fftA0.4105.190.0300.6981.10.3.-NA
60.0601eilA0.4424.930.0810.7461.13.11.39NA
70.0602wk5A0.4055.200.0790.7102.4.2.4NA
80.0601wojA0.5654.000.0900.8053.1.4.3739,123,125
90.0601azyA0.4055.380.0400.7222.4.2.4NA
100.0603iayA0.4003.720.0430.5562.7.7.7NA
110.0602pflA0.3934.940.0660.6572.3.1.54NA
120.0601sqiA0.4325.350.0650.7751.13.11.27NA
130.0601jh7A0.7332.750.1530.9173.1.4.-39,123
140.0601q16A0.3855.630.0360.7161.7.99.4NA
150.0603bq1A0.4024.700.0430.6452.7.7.7NA
160.0601iyxA0.3914.770.0730.6274.2.1.11NA
170.0602ivfA0.4115.410.0490.7221.17.99.2NA
180.0601t47A0.4314.920.0870.7571.13.11.2782,129
190.0601zedA0.4034.970.0360.6753.1.3.1137

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.290.8172.280.140.962fyhA GO:0004113 GO:0008081 GO:0008664 GO:0016787
10.270.7902.630.100.963j4qA GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0008022 GO:0008104 GO:0010738 GO:0016020 GO:0016208 GO:0016324 GO:0016529 GO:0019904 GO:0030315 GO:0032947 GO:0034237 GO:0043234 GO:0051018 GO:0070382
20.210.6252.770.140.785af2A GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003824 GO:0004482 GO:0004484 GO:0005525 GO:0006370 GO:0006397 GO:0008152 GO:0008168 GO:0016032 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0019012 GO:0019013 GO:0032259 GO:0036265
30.180.8082.190.160.941iuhA GO:0004113 GO:0008081 GO:0008664 GO:0016787
40.170.6862.690.130.854z5vA GO:0030430
50.170.7672.470.190.922d4gA GO:0016787 GO:0016788
60.150.7492.770.110.934qakB GO:0004113 GO:0008081 GO:0008664 GO:0016787
70.130.7433.000.110.954h7wA GO:0000175 GO:0004518 GO:0005634 GO:0006397 GO:0008380 GO:0016787 GO:0034477 GO:0045171 GO:0090305 GO:0090503
80.120.7332.750.150.921jh7A GO:0004112 GO:0005737 GO:0006388 GO:0016787
90.110.7132.840.120.902fsqA
100.070.6242.850.140.784rptA GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0004482 GO:0004484 GO:0005525 GO:0006370 GO:0006397 GO:0008168 GO:0016032 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0019012 GO:0019013 GO:0032259 GO:0036265
110.060.3505.550.040.634iv9A GO:0004497 GO:0009851 GO:0016491 GO:0050361 GO:0055114
120.060.3115.960.040.611zm5A GO:0046872
130.060.3095.580.070.573hjnA GO:0000166 GO:0004798 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006227 GO:0006233 GO:0006235 GO:0009041 GO:0009165 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0046939
140.060.2636.390.070.571texD GO:0016740
150.060.3324.670.050.542f7lA GO:0000287 GO:0005975 GO:0008966 GO:0016853 GO:0016868 GO:0046872 GO:0071704
160.060.3545.570.060.633ln6A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0004357 GO:0004363 GO:0005524 GO:0006750 GO:0008152 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
170.060.2366.190.090.492gbzA GO:0000175 GO:0003676 GO:0004518 GO:0004527 GO:0005737 GO:0016787 GO:0016788 GO:0016896 GO:0090305 GO:0090503
180.060.3036.000.050.594dwjB GO:0000166 GO:0004798 GO:0005524 GO:0006233 GO:0006235 GO:0009165 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0046939


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005198 GO:0032550 GO:0005515 GO:0032559 GO:0004113 GO:0008664 GO:0008192 GO:0008174 GO:0003676 GO:0035639 GO:0032561 GO:0008170
GO-Score 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41
Biological Processes GO:0033036 GO:1902531 GO:0010737 GO:0009452 GO:0001510 GO:0006397 GO:0044764 GO:0044403
GO-Score 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41
Cellular Component GO:0005783 GO:0016528 GO:0042383 GO:0030133 GO:0098590 GO:0045177 GO:0032991 GO:0099503 GO:0019028 GO:0033646
GO-Score 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.41 0.34

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.