[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1532c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.41 54 4qd8D 0FQ Rep, Mult 54,55,56,59,60,61,97,98,99,100,133
20.20 29 1wn3A HXC Rep, Mult 69,73,88,89,90,91,142
30.18 32 3r35B 4CO Rep, Mult 69,70,73,74,87,89,90,91,142,144
40.04 8 3f5oA UUU Rep, Mult 113,115,117,118,119,121
50.02 4 4k4bA UOQ Rep, Mult 18,22,27,69,73,74,89,90,91,144
60.02 5 3kuwB FAH Rep, Mult 69,90,91,92,93,139
70.01 2 1q4sA PHB Rep, Mult 54,56,60,61
80.01 2 1vh50 III Rep, Mult 21,25,26,29,30,50,51,53,55,60,61,62,63,65,66,69,70,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97
90.01 3 3r3aA PHB Rep, Mult 1,69,70,73,74,89,90
100.01 2 5t02A GDP Rep, Mult 41,109,110,111,113,123,124,125,133,136,138
110.00 1 3f5oC UUU Rep, Mult 94,95,96,137,138,140
120.00 1 3cf9C AGI Rep, Mult 65,68,69,96,125
130.00 1 2f410 III Rep, Mult 60,62,65,66,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97
140.00 1 2glpB BDE Rep, Mult 44,46,110

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.2181tbuB0.5881.930.0940.6673.1.2.261,109
20.2052qq2C0.6721.990.1740.7503.1.2.261,63,90
30.1601mkaA0.6993.140.0750.9174.2.1.6061
40.1152gllA0.7173.030.1500.9174.2.1.-NA
50.1061u1zB0.6983.040.1220.8964.2.1.-NA
60.0602d0vA0.4734.570.0600.7921.1.99.8NA
70.0603khpA0.5623.640.0960.7711.-.-.-109,124
80.0603b7kC0.6482.350.1040.7363.1.2.161,70
90.0601vlbA0.4694.790.1060.7501.2.99.762,108
100.0602hx5A0.5493.370.1320.7363.1.2.-136
110.0602ownB0.5753.120.0930.7433.1.2.14NA
120.0603kvnX0.4752.860.0430.6113.1.1.1129
130.0602v1oE0.6401.570.1580.7013.1.2.262,73
140.0603khpC0.5663.440.1040.7641.-.-.-NA
150.0601lrwA0.4714.610.0680.7921.1.99.8NA
160.0601z6bA0.6812.900.0870.8614.2.1.-NA
170.0602c2iA0.5743.100.0800.7364.2.1.17NA
180.0603el6A0.5913.180.1300.7924.2.1.6160
190.0603ir3A0.5912.570.1070.7014.2.1.-NA
200.0601s9cD0.5662.980.0830.7294.2.1.107NA
210.0601iq6B0.6152.300.0760.7084.2.1.17NA
220.0602vkzG0.6193.220.0750.8262.3.1.38,3.1.2.14NA
230.0601lo8A0.6082.490.0750.7363.1.2.23NA
240.0603c7oA0.4754.870.0650.8333.2.1.55NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.470.7631.490.200.834k02A GO:0005777 GO:0016787 GO:0042372 GO:0051289
10.430.7581.640.200.833s4kA GO:0016787
20.410.8332.240.120.942b6eD GO:0016787
30.400.7582.520.130.894gahB GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005758 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006915 GO:0016020 GO:0016290 GO:0016787 GO:0032587 GO:0035338 GO:0042995 GO:0043491 GO:0047617 GO:1902108
40.390.7772.150.200.902cy9B GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005819 GO:0005829 GO:0005856 GO:0016787 GO:0047617 GO:0051289 GO:0070062
50.390.8321.630.200.922fs2B GO:0010124 GO:0016289 GO:0016787 GO:0016790
60.390.7842.170.230.923f5oA GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005819 GO:0005829 GO:0005856 GO:0016787 GO:0035338 GO:0047617 GO:0051289 GO:0070062
70.370.7381.510.200.811wluA GO:0016790
80.330.8172.180.150.954qd7A GO:0016787
90.320.7562.310.130.884ae8A GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005758 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006915 GO:0016020 GO:0016290 GO:0016787 GO:0032587 GO:0035338 GO:0042995 GO:0043491 GO:0047617 GO:1902108
100.320.8381.940.150.941vi8B GO:0009234 GO:0016289 GO:0016787 GO:0016790 GO:0061522
110.300.6932.680.140.822gvhB GO:0016787
120.290.7812.260.120.901q4sA GO:0016787 GO:0018739
130.260.8441.910.150.941vh9A GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0009239 GO:0016289 GO:0016787 GO:0016788 GO:0016790 GO:0042802
140.060.2432.800.020.311af8A GO:0017000
150.060.2714.370.060.442dm7A GO:0000166 GO:0004672 GO:0004674 GO:0005085 GO:0005089 GO:0005516 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006468 GO:0007275 GO:0008307 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0030016 GO:0030018 GO:0030154 GO:0030506 GO:0031430 GO:0031432 GO:0035023 GO:0036309 GO:0043065 GO:0043547 GO:0045214 GO:0046872 GO:0051056 GO:0098779
160.060.7151.820.210.783lbbA
170.060.7281.580.110.803gekA
180.060.8751.410.220.943e1eC
190.060.7921.610.240.883e29B
200.060.7561.640.320.833dkzA


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016290
GO-Score 0.40
Biological Processes GO:0051289 GO:0042372 GO:0035338 GO:0006631 GO:0043491 GO:1902108
GO-Score 0.68 0.47 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Cellular Component GO:0005829 GO:0005777 GO:0005743 GO:0005759 GO:0032587 GO:0005758 GO:0005819 GO:0070062 GO:0005634
GO-Score 0.63 0.47 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.39 0.39 0.39

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.