[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1508c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.17 7 2ckjC FES Rep, Mult 20,21,22,24,29,30,31
20.05 2 3fi8A MG Rep, Mult 155,163
30.03 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 154,159,441,445,448
40.03 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 33,37,443
50.03 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 13,142,145,431
60.02 1 3madA PO4 Rep, Mult 155,159
70.02 1 3zxsA MG Rep, Mult 163,265
80.02 1 4dz4A UNK Rep, Mult 147,157
90.02 1 2av8A FE2 Rep, Mult 107,266
100.02 1 2v8vD URP Rep, Mult 271,333
110.02 1 2wscB CLA Rep, Mult 449,450
120.02 1 3ibjA MG Rep, Mult 461,522
130.02 1 1c9uB CA Rep, Mult 254,259,347

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601l1lA0.3277.910.0470.5331.17.4.229
20.0601e1yA0.2988.120.0510.4992.4.1.18
30.0602vdcF0.3228.010.0400.5341.4.1.1314,146
40.0602w00B0.3297.140.0280.5013.1.21.3NA
50.0603gpbA0.3128.020.0550.5212.4.1.18
60.0602je8B0.3097.860.0540.5023.2.1.25NA
70.0601br2A0.3207.980.0430.5273.6.1.32NA
80.0602qnoA0.3517.870.0480.5663.2.1.4NA
90.0603cf4A0.3288.060.0700.5411.2.99.2NA
100.0602aryA0.1945.840.0470.2623.4.22.52NA
110.0602ckjA0.3227.920.0340.5271.17.1.4,1.17.3.2NA
120.0602pdaA0.3367.730.0470.5361.2.7.1NA
130.0601fa9A0.3178.350.0360.5462.4.1.1NA
140.0602qf7B0.3108.420.0680.5386.4.1.1NA
150.0602g8eA0.1985.880.0490.2673.4.22.52NA
160.0601b0pA0.3268.090.0310.5481.2.7.1NA
170.0603gm8A0.3227.380.0420.4993.2.1.-NA
180.0602cseW0.3267.050.0540.4873.6.4.13NA
190.0603b9jC0.2547.610.0320.3971.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.160.8101.980.140.855f15A GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740
10.070.6135.050.060.773wakA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
20.070.6094.680.070.753wajA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
30.070.5585.480.070.723rceA GO:0000287 GO:0004576 GO:0005886 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0018279 GO:0046872
40.060.2628.040.050.435azaA GO:0004576 GO:0005215 GO:0005363 GO:0006486 GO:0006810 GO:0006974 GO:0008643 GO:0015768 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0030288 GO:0034289 GO:0042597 GO:0042956 GO:0043190 GO:0055052 GO:0060326 GO:1901982 GO:1990060
50.060.2917.960.040.481lshA GO:0005319 GO:0006869 GO:0045735
60.060.2558.580.040.463waiA GO:0004576 GO:0005215 GO:0005363 GO:0006486 GO:0006810 GO:0006974 GO:0008643 GO:0015768 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0030288 GO:0034289 GO:0042597 GO:0042956 GO:0043190 GO:0046872 GO:0055052 GO:0060326 GO:1901982 GO:1990060
70.060.2676.980.040.404gklA GO:0003824 GO:0005975
80.060.2557.320.050.403vu1B GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046872
90.060.2487.270.040.393wovA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
100.060.2136.900.060.324v2pB GO:0003824 GO:0004315 GO:0006633 GO:0008152 GO:0016740
110.060.2317.850.050.382amxA GO:0009168 GO:0019239
120.060.1986.560.040.294xmpG GO:0005198 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019031 GO:0019062 GO:0020002 GO:0033644 GO:0039663 GO:0044174 GO:0044175 GO:0046718 GO:0055036
130.060.1886.290.050.273aagA GO:0004576 GO:0005886 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0046872
140.060.1996.810.050.304j6rG GO:0005198 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019031 GO:0019062 GO:0039663 GO:0044174 GO:0044175 GO:0046718 GO:0055036
150.060.1815.620.060.244dguA GO:0046872
160.060.1575.430.040.211r5aA GO:0016740 GO:0046872
170.060.1525.650.070.213c8uA GO:0008865 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0046835
180.060.1796.300.030.252lgzA GO:0004576 GO:0004579 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0008250 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0018279 GO:0043687


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016758 GO:0043169
GO-Score 0.48 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0044763 GO:0006464 GO:0009101 GO:0043413
GO-Score 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48
Cellular Component GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.36

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.