[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1505c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 3 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.51 39 3bsyA ACO Rep, Mult 134,150,152,153,168,170,171,186,188,189,202,204,211
20.13 14 4j09A III Rep, Mult 138,140,141,156,158,159,174,176,192,193,207
30.06 5 4ea7A JB2 Rep, Mult 8,11,12,13,33,34,35,53,70,71,78,82,150
40.03 4 2oi5B ACO Rep, Mult 128,129,144,146,147,164,165,182,184
50.03 2 4ea9A JBT Rep, Mult 8,11,12,13,33,34,35,53,70,71,78,82,134,150,153,168,170,171,188,189,204,211
60.03 4 4m99B ACO Rep, Mult 140,141,158,159,176,177,194,206,207,209
70.02 2 3mqgA U5P Rep, Mult 134,135,153,168,171
80.02 2 3r8yA CA Rep, Mult 122,140,141,159
90.02 3 2iu8A UD1 Rep, Mult 141,142,159,160,177,178
100.01 1 3ectA CA Rep, Mult 172,190
110.01 1 3nz2C MG Rep, Mult 190,192,206
120.01 1 3mqgF U5P Rep, Mult 96,114,134
130.01 1 3mqhA MJZ Rep, Mult 132,150,170

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.2571ocxB0.5062.720.1660.5662.3.1.79145,152,170,180,182,190,196
20.2102ic7A0.5092.770.2110.5752.3.1.79133
30.0971ocxA0.5062.720.1660.5662.3.1.79NA
40.0601txgA0.4984.780.0570.7201.1.1.94NA
50.0601kruA0.5272.930.1760.6022.3.1.18NA
60.0603gvdI0.5174.740.1430.7292.3.1.30NA
70.0601u8xX0.4974.920.0490.7513.2.1.122132,145,187
80.0601v3wA0.5501.880.1480.5884.2.1.120
90.0603d8vA0.5333.640.0790.6422.7.7.23,2.3.1.157NA
100.0601yp3C0.4993.770.1390.6202.7.7.27NA
110.0602iu8A0.5283.080.1150.6022.3.1.-141
120.0603cj8A0.4963.440.1090.5932.3.1.89197
130.0601s6yA0.4954.910.0550.7473.2.1.868,77
140.0603mc4A0.5184.410.1060.6702.3.1.30133,140
150.0603eg4A0.5443.840.0990.6972.3.1.117135
160.0603fsyD0.5893.580.0960.7562.3.1.117162
170.0603hjjA0.5082.590.1520.5702.3.1.79NA
180.0601krvC0.5262.800.1830.5972.3.1.18145,152,180,182,186,188,190,196
190.0602vheA0.8201.510.1990.8642.7.7.23141
200.0603eh0A0.5563.590.0900.6612.3.1.-141
210.0601hm9B0.5413.850.1550.6742.3.1.157,2.7.7.23128
220.0601ssqD0.5274.050.1080.6792.3.1.30NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.390.8761.600.240.934eaaA GO:0016740
10.360.9011.120.220.934m99A GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740
20.350.8661.930.200.944m9cA GO:0016740 GO:0016746
30.340.7981.530.190.843bssA GO:0006486 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747 GO:0018279
40.230.5652.910.170.643t57A GO:0005739 GO:0006629 GO:0008780 GO:0009245 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:2001289
50.210.5682.820.160.645depA GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0008610 GO:0008780 GO:0009245 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
60.180.4902.380.110.544mfgA GO:0016740 GO:0016746
70.170.5622.730.160.634eqyA GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0008610 GO:0008780 GO:0009245 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
80.160.5274.050.110.681ssqD GO:0005737 GO:0006535 GO:0008652 GO:0009001 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0019344
90.160.5443.660.100.693tk8A GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0008666 GO:0009085 GO:0009089 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0019877
100.150.5092.770.210.572ic7A GO:0008925 GO:0016407 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
110.150.5481.900.160.594n27A GO:0016740 GO:0046872
120.140.5642.790.170.634e6tB GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0008610 GO:0008780 GO:0009245 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
130.140.5511.850.150.592fkoA GO:0046872
140.140.5511.930.160.593r1wB
150.130.5622.900.160.633r0sA GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0008610 GO:0008780 GO:0009245 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
160.120.5573.300.130.653pmoA GO:0006629 GO:0009245 GO:0016410 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747
170.120.5622.890.160.631j2zA GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0008610 GO:0008780 GO:0009245 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
180.120.5461.810.110.583ixcA GO:0016740 GO:0046872
190.110.5393.930.140.684e1kA GO:0000287 GO:0000902 GO:0003824 GO:0003977 GO:0005737 GO:0006048 GO:0008152 GO:0008360 GO:0009103 GO:0009245 GO:0009252 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016779 GO:0019134 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
200.110.5443.840.100.703eg4A GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0008666 GO:0009085 GO:0009089 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0019877
210.100.5343.610.120.663dk5A GO:0000287 GO:0000902 GO:0003824 GO:0003977 GO:0005737 GO:0006048 GO:0008152 GO:0008360 GO:0009103 GO:0009245 GO:0009252 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016779 GO:0019134 GO:0046872 GO:0071555


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0008374
GO-Score 0.47
Biological Processes GO:0008654 GO:0046493 GO:0006040 GO:0009247 GO:1901271 GO:0018279
GO-Score 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.34
Cellular Component GO:0043231 GO:0044444 GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.47 0.47 0.36

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.