[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1503c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.18 14 2ogaA PGU Rep, Mult 12,35,37
20.12 10 2po3B T4K Rep, Mult 123,124
30.08 7 3dr7D GPD Rep, Mult 94,119,121,124
40.07 6 3frkB TQP Rep, Mult 94,121,123,124
50.06 5 2ogaA PGU Rep, Mult 12,26,27,35,37
60.05 5 3b8xB G4M Rep, Mult 119,121,124
70.04 3 3dr7B GPD Rep, Mult 26,27
80.02 3 4iy7D PYR Rep, Mult 63,160,162,163,164
90.02 2 4xk83 CLA Rep, Mult 68,71
100.01 1 4zdoD NUC Rep, Mult 112,116,176
110.01 1 3i54D CMP Rep, Mult 61,65
120.01 1 3kgxA MG Rep, Mult 66,70,168
130.01 1 3ju7B CA Rep, Mult 51
140.01 1 4jtdB PGW Rep, Mult 56,157,158
150.01 1 2dglD BR Rep, Mult 56,160
160.01 1 2gmsA MG Rep, Mult 162,165

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602cb1A0.6112.880.1140.7694.2.99.10NA
20.0603caiA0.6053.500.1090.7912.6.1.-NA
30.0601n8pC0.6083.310.1230.8024.4.1.1NA
40.0602zc0A0.5953.420.1090.7582.6.1.44NA
50.0602jg2A0.5873.070.0740.7422.3.1.5067
60.0602c7tA0.7403.420.1580.9672.6.1.-NA
70.0603if2A0.6033.390.1140.7692.6.1.-NA
80.0602hzpA0.5883.920.1160.8083.7.1.3NA
90.0601qgnA0.5903.090.1010.7582.5.1.4867
100.0601pg8A0.6053.510.1230.7974.4.1.11NA
110.0602r2nA0.5863.740.1020.7862.6.1.39,2.6.1.7NA
120.0602wk8B0.5763.280.1280.7312.3.-.-68
130.0601cl1B0.6013.250.0990.7804.4.1.8NA
140.0601p3wB0.6213.620.1260.8192.8.1.7NA
150.0601cs1A0.6073.090.0770.7862.5.1.48NA
160.0601gc0B0.5863.460.1280.7694.4.1.11NA
170.0602qlrA0.5863.700.1010.7912.6.1.39,2.6.1.7NA
180.0603a2bA0.5873.020.0900.7312.3.1.5068
190.0601b9hA0.8122.270.1450.9454.2.1.-NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.260.8002.250.230.922ogaA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0016740 GO:0017000 GO:0030170 GO:0033068
10.220.8271.990.260.923dr4C GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009103 GO:0009243 GO:0016740
20.210.9121.520.250.974lc3A GO:0003824
30.190.8431.930.160.952fniA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0016740
40.190.7822.730.120.932gmsA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0016740
50.170.8122.270.140.951b9hA GO:0003824 GO:0016740 GO:0016829 GO:0017000
60.170.8022.280.190.912po3A GO:0003824
70.160.8042.330.170.954k2mA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0016740 GO:0017000 GO:0030170
80.160.8162.120.240.921mdxA GO:0003824 GO:0006629 GO:0008483 GO:0009103 GO:0009245 GO:0016740 GO:0046493 GO:0046677 GO:0099621
90.160.8082.830.180.953bcxA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0016740
100.150.7922.640.450.954zahA GO:0003824 GO:0009246 GO:0016740 GO:0019180 GO:0030170
110.150.7862.330.190.923uwcA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0016740
120.150.7941.930.210.893frkA GO:0003824
130.140.7692.150.200.883ju7A GO:0003824
140.140.7562.520.240.904qgrA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0016740
150.140.7632.440.190.914zasA GO:0003824
160.140.7403.420.160.972c7tA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0016740 GO:0017000
170.130.7762.420.130.914ztcA GO:0003824 GO:0006486 GO:0008483 GO:0016740 GO:0047302
180.130.7582.080.250.863nu7B GO:0000271 GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009103 GO:0009243 GO:0016740 GO:0030170 GO:0071555


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0008483 GO:0048037 GO:0043168
GO-Score 0.62 0.52 0.52
Biological Processes GO:0030639 GO:1901336 GO:0033067 GO:0009103 GO:0046402
GO-Score 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.44 0.44
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.