[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1459c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.04 2 3wakA MN Rep, Mult 135,256,257,258
20.04 2 1jdbE GLN Rep, Mult 196,197,206,207,210
30.04 2 1a9x2 III Rep, Mult 140,143,144,147,190,191,192
40.04 2 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 239,242,533
50.04 2 3d1lA MPR Rep, Mult 118,130
60.02 1 5ezmA PC Rep, Mult 181,292,293,350,353
70.02 1 5ezmA DSL Rep, Mult 268,269,272,280,281,284,296,299,300,302,303,414,418
80.02 1 2x7aI MG Rep, Mult 240,244
90.02 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 246,250,372,375,439
100.02 1 2o01A SF4 Rep, Mult 190,191,192,194
110.02 1 1fipA III Rep, Mult 184,185
120.02 1 2wscA CLA Rep, Mult 221,226
130.02 1 2o013 CLA Rep, Mult 139,142
140.02 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 249,254,543,547,550
150.02 1 1siwA SF4 Rep, Mult 219,220,241,244,248
160.02 1 1a9x1 III Rep, Mult 96,97,99,100,125
170.02 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 545
180.02 1 5ezmA ZN Rep, Mult 181,353,355
190.02 1 3rl3A MN Rep, Mult 149,151
200.02 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 291,294,425,426

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601fziA0.3207.470.0330.5061.14.13.25NA
20.0602wj2A0.3216.940.0500.4793.5.1.99NA
30.0603ikmD0.3198.020.0460.5242.7.7.7131,204
40.0602ow6A0.3298.240.0460.5583.2.1.114151
50.0603c46B0.3548.210.0510.5992.7.7.6NA
60.0601n1hA0.3368.290.0560.5742.7.7.48170
70.0602j5wA0.3398.150.0340.5741.16.3.1NA
80.0601l2aE0.3287.910.0460.5403.2.1.4NA
90.0602vdcF0.3217.930.0420.5301.4.1.1350
100.0602gq3A0.3307.580.0570.5182.3.3.9NA
110.0601t3tA0.3318.500.0380.5896.3.5.3NA
120.0603iayA0.3196.850.0460.4692.7.7.7NA
130.0602ipyA0.2678.420.0480.4624.2.1.3NA
140.0601w6jA0.3207.830.0480.5215.4.99.7NA
150.0601bxrA0.3458.140.0420.5806.3.5.5219
160.0602b3xA0.3467.520.0520.5484.2.1.3135
170.0601fo4A0.3237.920.0480.5351.17.1.4NA
180.0601ffuB0.3187.930.0630.5261.2.99.2287
190.0601jqoA0.3197.650.0390.5094.1.1.31NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.110.6932.740.130.755f15A GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740
10.070.5354.770.090.663wakA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
20.070.5204.300.080.633wajA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
30.070.4934.880.090.613rceA GO:0000287 GO:0004576 GO:0005886 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0018279 GO:0046872
40.060.2767.510.060.443vu1B GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046872
50.060.2397.500.040.392amxA GO:0009168 GO:0019239
60.060.2637.510.040.411lshA GO:0005319 GO:0006869 GO:0045735
70.060.2557.760.050.413wovA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
80.060.2278.700.040.403waiA GO:0004576 GO:0005215 GO:0005363 GO:0006486 GO:0006810 GO:0006974 GO:0008643 GO:0015768 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0030288 GO:0034289 GO:0042597 GO:0042956 GO:0043190 GO:0046872 GO:0055052 GO:0060326 GO:1901982 GO:1990060
90.060.2898.410.050.495azaA GO:0004576 GO:0005215 GO:0005363 GO:0006486 GO:0006810 GO:0006974 GO:0008643 GO:0015768 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0030288 GO:0034289 GO:0042597 GO:0042956 GO:0043190 GO:0055052 GO:0060326 GO:1901982 GO:1990060
100.060.2246.850.040.344gklA GO:0003824 GO:0005975
110.060.2206.590.030.324v2pB GO:0003824 GO:0004315 GO:0006633 GO:0008152 GO:0016740
120.060.2046.020.050.283aagA GO:0004576 GO:0005886 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0046872
130.060.2016.800.030.304xmpG GO:0005198 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019031 GO:0019062 GO:0020002 GO:0033644 GO:0039663 GO:0044174 GO:0044175 GO:0046718 GO:0055036
140.060.2067.050.060.314j6rG GO:0005198 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019031 GO:0019062 GO:0039663 GO:0044174 GO:0044175 GO:0046718 GO:0055036
150.060.2046.430.030.292lgzA GO:0004576 GO:0004579 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0008250 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0018279 GO:0043687
160.060.1676.120.030.233aagB GO:0004576 GO:0005886 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0046872
170.060.1506.820.030.233e20B GO:0002184 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006412 GO:0006415 GO:0016149 GO:0018444
180.060.1645.220.030.213c8uA GO:0008865 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0046835


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016758 GO:0043169
GO-Score 0.47 0.47
Biological Processes GO:0044763 GO:0006464 GO:0009101 GO:0043413
GO-Score 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47
Cellular Component GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.32

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.