[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1443c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.17 12 3k3kB A8S Rep, Mult 37,69,79,94,96,101,104,135,139
20.09 6 4n3eG 2AN Rep, Mult 12,14,23,27,94,108,110,122,143,147
30.04 3 2hduB F12 Rep, Mult 151,152
40.04 3 2qimA ZEA Rep, Mult 9,11,13,94,106,122,124,139
50.03 2 3njoC PYV Rep, Mult 42,68,70,79,81,101,134,138
60.03 2 2qimA ZEA Rep, Mult 27,28,33,92,94,108,147
70.01 1 2einL ZN Rep, Mult 106,113
80.01 1 3c0vC TBR Rep, Mult 95,97,100,104,125
90.01 1 1q16A AGA Rep, Mult 147,150
100.01 1 2flhB ZEA Rep, Mult 37,41,68,70,79,81
110.01 1 3uomA CA Rep, Mult 87,116
120.01 1 3rj8A ZN Rep, Mult 105,106

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601b5sE0.5174.490.0680.8202.3.1.1227,82
20.0602fp0B0.4745.060.0510.8203.2.1.143NA
30.0601q6xA0.5324.570.0490.8512.3.1.6NA
40.0601t7nA0.5434.290.0620.8452.3.1.7NA
50.0602de6B0.6264.320.0380.9321.14.12.-149
60.0602vq5A0.6693.060.1320.8764.2.1.7851,64,68,78
70.0601yaaA0.5034.420.0580.7952.6.1.124,122
80.0601yaaB0.5044.420.0510.7952.6.1.1NA
90.0601wqlA0.6174.050.0660.9131.14.12.-NA
100.0601ciaA0.5134.450.0370.8012.3.1.28NA
110.0602debA0.5274.250.0430.7952.3.1.21NA
120.0601xl7B0.5264.270.0290.8202.3.1.137NA
130.0601sczA0.5134.700.0200.8262.3.1.61NA
140.0601bibA0.4844.200.0850.7086.3.4.15NA
150.0601uliC0.6224.130.0670.9191.14.12.18NA
160.0603e2dA0.4824.880.0690.8263.1.3.1NA
170.0601xl7A0.5294.370.0500.8262.3.1.13795,148
180.0601dpbA0.5174.540.0550.8202.3.1.12NA
190.0602b1xA0.6134.150.0780.9131.14.12.12149

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.290.6942.350.170.833q63F GO:0006950
10.260.7692.380.110.933k3kA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
20.250.7142.410.140.861z94B GO:0006950
30.250.6692.420.150.801xn6A GO:0006950
40.250.6862.780.120.863cnwA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
50.250.7063.170.110.911xfsA GO:0006950
60.230.6893.180.140.903pu2B GO:0006950
70.230.7312.770.110.923nefA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
80.230.6893.130.140.893uidA GO:0006950
90.230.6762.980.140.882bk0A GO:0006952 GO:0009607
100.220.6763.010.130.894q0kA GO:0006952 GO:0009607 GO:0009740
110.210.7093.110.090.934oicA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
120.210.6562.520.140.802m89A GO:0006950
130.210.6602.460.150.801xn5A GO:0006950
140.210.6513.300.120.852leqA GO:0006950
150.200.7492.580.120.902rerA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008168 GO:0008171 GO:0016740 GO:0017000 GO:0032259
160.200.6512.780.090.842lcgA GO:0006950
170.200.6892.860.100.892flhB GO:0006952 GO:0009607
180.200.7292.810.110.923w9rA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
190.200.7182.880.100.923kdhA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
200.200.6942.760.110.874n0gC GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
210.190.6792.900.140.843rd6A GO:0006950
220.190.6922.820.100.882ldkA GO:0006950
230.190.6362.580.160.784fpwA GO:0006950
240.180.6742.720.100.844jdlB GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
250.180.6962.930.130.903q64A GO:0006950
260.170.6673.150.120.892qimA GO:0006952 GO:0009607 GO:0046872
270.170.7133.230.090.941xuvA GO:0006950
280.170.6972.960.120.903putB GO:0006950
290.170.6183.040.110.782kewA GO:0006950
300.170.7083.000.090.913rt0C GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
310.170.6823.240.080.911e09A GO:0006952 GO:0009607
320.160.6873.300.090.924c9iA GO:0006952 GO:0009607
330.160.6452.800.170.812luzA GO:0006950
340.160.6812.950.120.883otlA GO:0006950
350.160.6863.110.080.914a80A GO:0005737 GO:0006952 GO:0009607
360.160.6712.800.070.853eliA GO:0006950
370.160.6543.480.130.892l9pA GO:0006950
380.150.6392.920.060.812nn5A GO:0006950
390.150.6773.570.100.922il5A GO:0006950
400.120.7193.140.100.933ojiB GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
410.100.6913.320.070.925i8fA GO:0006952 GO:0009607


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0046983 GO:0042802 GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0010427
GO-Score 0.53 0.53 0.45 0.45 0.45
Biological Processes GO:0006950 GO:0043086 GO:0080163 GO:0009738
GO-Score 0.60 0.45 0.45 0.45
Cellular Component GO:0071944 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0016020
GO-Score 0.53 0.45 0.45 0.40

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.