[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1404

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.20 13 1z9cA NUC Rep, Mult 44,46,47,71,74,75,82,97,98,99
20.17 13 3zplA NUC Rep, Mult 34,61,62,63,73,74,77,78,91,99,100,101
30.10 8 1z9cB NUC Rep, Mult 22,26,30,33,62,63,73,74,77,81,91,99,100,101
40.04 3 4xrfA ISQ Rep, Mult 18,21,143
50.03 2 3bpxA NA Rep, Mult 44,47,79,82
60.02 2 3gf2A SAL Rep, Mult 45,49,52,120
70.02 2 3bpxA SAL Rep, Mult 49,52,56,68,69
80.01 1 2fbhA ZN Rep, Mult 35,36,37,40
90.01 1 3gezA CA Rep, Mult 152,155
100.01 1 3echB III Rep, Mult 16,18,19,20,22,23,25,26,28,29,32,33,36,45,46,49,120,124
110.01 1 3bpxB SAL Rep, Mult 15,18,19,22,26
120.01 1 3hsrC BT6 Rep, Mult 28,32,127
130.01 1 3bpv0 III Rep, Mult 21,23,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,45,68,69,70,71,122,123,130,132,134,135,136,138,160
140.01 1 3fm5C MG Rep, Mult 141,144
150.01 1 3bpxA SAL Rep, Mult 22,26
160.01 1 2yr2B ZN Rep, Mult 94,96
170.01 1 1z910 III Rep, Mult 10,11,14,15,32,45,48,49,52,53,56,69,70,117,118,135,136,159

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602rl1A0.4374.890.0740.7252.5.1.7NA
20.0601ef0B0.3965.110.0560.7063.1.-.-NA
30.0601mswD0.3885.140.0850.6562.7.7.6NA
40.0603kalA0.4445.580.0260.7946.3.2.3NA
50.0601mj9A0.5333.950.0560.7252.3.1.4862,72,77,101
60.0602rgrA0.4854.210.0820.7255.99.1.3NA
70.0602rl2A0.4324.860.0540.7132.5.1.775
80.0602pe4A0.4404.690.0230.7133.2.1.35NA
90.0602e7zA0.4714.780.0600.8004.2.1.7161
100.0601dfaA0.4094.840.0440.6883.6.3.14,3.6.1.34NA
110.0601fy7A0.5323.950.0640.7252.3.1.48NA
120.0601aroP0.5264.580.0560.8252.7.7.6NA
130.0602rnpC0.3415.140.0390.5942.7.7.6NA
140.0602jc9A0.4615.330.0900.8193.1.3.561
150.0601jvaB0.4795.180.0480.8313.6.3.14,3.6.1.34NA
160.0602gaiA0.4994.220.1250.7255.99.1.2NA
170.0603kakB0.4115.310.0480.7506.3.2.3NA
180.0602rc4A0.4713.950.0500.6812.3.1.48,NA
190.0603fofA0.4684.040.0730.6885.99.1.-NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.590.5933.260.790.822nyxB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005886 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0044212
10.480.8660.780.270.894xrfA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
20.420.6333.320.190.833bpxA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
30.410.6523.260.190.863f3xA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0044212
40.330.6702.910.150.822pexB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
50.320.5623.560.200.761jgsA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0009408 GO:0044212 GO:0045892 GO:0046677 GO:0071236
60.300.6413.690.130.914hblD GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
70.300.6293.330.150.813boqB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
80.300.7063.120.150.903nqoA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
90.300.7013.170.200.893zmdC GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0044212
100.300.6003.610.180.855aipA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0010124 GO:0045892
110.300.6483.270.190.823bjaA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
120.290.5633.690.160.763gfiA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0046872
130.280.5363.440.170.743oopA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
140.280.6063.750.220.863e6mD GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
150.270.6682.630.250.812nnnA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0044212
160.270.6882.590.170.834fhtB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0044212
170.270.6762.970.180.843q5fA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0009405
180.260.5963.600.210.853cjnA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
190.260.6533.410.200.855cyvB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
200.250.5463.840.230.804yifB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
210.250.7433.230.160.943zplE GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0044212
220.240.5803.480.240.821s3jA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006367 GO:0044212
230.210.5274.020.140.782ethA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
240.210.5713.740.180.844aijB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
250.190.5474.030.100.844kdpA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
260.130.5673.660.120.813g3zA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
270.100.6863.180.100.912fxaB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0030435 GO:0045892
280.080.5763.530.170.822rdpA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
290.070.5863.420.140.823mexA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0034763 GO:0042802 GO:0044212 GO:0045892 GO:0050709


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003700 GO:0044212
GO-Score 0.95 0.76
Biological Processes GO:0006355
GO-Score 0.95
Cellular Component GO:0005886
GO-Score 0.59

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.