[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1209

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.11 4 3l26A MG Rep, Mult 63,64,65,66
20.08 3 3oe6A OLC Rep, Mult 79,80,83,84,87
30.06 2 3oe6A OLC Rep, Mult 72,75,76,79
40.06 2 2i37A UUU Rep, Mult 69,70,71,75,76
50.06 2 1sumB FE Rep, Mult 51,55,76,80
60.03 1 2vrzA ZN Rep, Mult 83,86
70.03 1 1fbmD RTL Rep, Mult 85,92
80.03 1 3uctA MN Rep, Mult 59,70
90.03 1 1kejA CO Rep, Mult 53,55
100.03 1 1pnkA CA Rep, Mult 68,70

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603no9A0.5224.230.0620.8114.2.1.249
20.0601qleC0.5124.180.0650.8281.9.3.117
30.0601qd1B0.3295.280.1110.6802.1.2.5,4.3.1.4NA
40.0601h2aL0.4914.150.1070.7791.12.2.1NA
50.0601krqA0.4944.450.0550.8031.16.3.150
60.0603mddA0.5014.340.0750.8111.3.99.352,55,86
70.0601w27A0.4993.670.0780.7384.3.1.24NA
80.0602vuaA0.3175.520.0340.6563.4.24.6975,76,82
90.0601vdkA0.5194.070.0520.7874.2.1.2NA
100.0601udyA0.5054.510.0740.8201.3.99.350,76
110.0603b8cA0.5293.810.0330.7623.6.3.6NA
120.0601eumE0.4974.240.0770.7951.16.3.1NA
130.0603e04D0.5074.150.0680.7874.2.1.284
140.0601jqiA0.4994.490.1090.8031.3.99.276
150.0603btaA0.5134.220.0510.8443.4.24.69NA
160.0601bucA0.5034.590.0910.8111.3.99.281
170.0601b8fA0.5164.080.1050.7794.3.1.3NA
180.0601h2rL0.4914.290.1070.7871.12.2.128,49
190.0601yfeA0.5104.240.1120.7874.2.1.267

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.380.5102.310.180.594ug1B GO:0005737 GO:0007049 GO:0008360 GO:0051301
10.190.4721.900.140.524ug3A GO:0005737 GO:0007049 GO:0008360 GO:0051301
20.090.6413.230.120.894ut1A GO:0005198 GO:0009424 GO:0044780
30.090.6483.070.090.892d4yA GO:0005198 GO:0005576 GO:0009288 GO:0009424 GO:0044780 GO:0071973
40.070.6103.820.050.935bpwA GO:0004842 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005680 GO:0005829 GO:0007049 GO:0007067 GO:0016567 GO:0019903 GO:0030071 GO:0031145 GO:0042787 GO:0043161 GO:0051301 GO:0051436 GO:0051437 GO:0051439 GO:0070979
50.070.5934.220.080.935a31I GO:0004842 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005680 GO:0005829 GO:0007049 GO:0007067 GO:0016567 GO:0019903 GO:0030071 GO:0031145 GO:0042787 GO:0043161 GO:0051301 GO:0051436 GO:0051437 GO:0051439 GO:0070979
60.070.5684.060.050.895bptA GO:0005680 GO:0030071 GO:0031145
70.060.4214.280.020.693peiA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
80.060.4603.670.040.623g9gA GO:0000144 GO:0000147 GO:0001400 GO:0004857 GO:0005934 GO:0005935 GO:0006897 GO:0007049 GO:0032185 GO:0042802 GO:0043086 GO:0061645
90.060.3594.490.070.611pmtA GO:0004364 GO:0005737 GO:0016740
100.060.3785.220.080.681n8pA GO:0003824 GO:0003962 GO:0004123 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0016829 GO:0019343 GO:0019344 GO:0019346 GO:0030170 GO:0042802 GO:0044540 GO:0071266 GO:0080146
110.060.3504.690.050.614g9hA GO:0016740
120.060.3684.630.060.604b8cB GO:0000288 GO:0000289 GO:0000749 GO:0000932 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006357 GO:0006368 GO:0007124 GO:0017148 GO:0030015 GO:0032947 GO:0032968 GO:0051726
130.060.4393.900.060.673s84B GO:0001523 GO:0002227 GO:0005319 GO:0005507 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0005769 GO:0005788 GO:0005829 GO:0006695 GO:0006810 GO:0006869 GO:0006982 GO:0007159 GO:0008203 GO:0008289 GO:0009986 GO:0010873 GO:0010898 GO:0015485 GO:0016209 GO:0017127 GO:0019430 GO:0030300 GO:0031102 GO:0031210 GO:0032374 GO:0033344 GO:0033700 GO:0034361 GO:0034364 GO:0034371 GO:0034372 GO:0034375 GO:0034378 GO:0034380 GO:0034445 GO:0035634 GO:0042157 GO:0042158 GO:0042627 GO:0042632 GO:0042744 GO:0042803 GO:0043691 GO:0044240 GO:0044267 GO:0045723 GO:0046470 GO:0051006 GO:0055088 GO:0060228 GO:0065005 GO:0070062 GO:0070328 GO:0072562
140.060.3925.090.040.732aekA GO:0016106 GO:0016829 GO:0045482
150.060.3644.570.050.633drwA GO:0000287 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0006000 GO:0006096 GO:0008443 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0043844 GO:0046835 GO:0046872
160.060.3004.850.080.552v9qA GO:0002042 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006919 GO:0006935 GO:0007155 GO:0007156 GO:0007275 GO:0007399 GO:0007411 GO:0007507 GO:0008046 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016199 GO:0021836 GO:0030154 GO:0030275 GO:0030336 GO:0030424 GO:0033600 GO:0035025 GO:0035385 GO:0042802 GO:0042995 GO:0050772 GO:0050925 GO:0070100
170.060.3375.210.050.641o7dA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0004559 GO:0005764 GO:0005975 GO:0006013 GO:0006517 GO:0007611 GO:0008152 GO:0008270 GO:0015923 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0046872
180.060.3864.630.030.724n0rA GO:0005975
190.060.3744.050.030.613mydA GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0009306 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0044780 GO:0044781
200.060.2945.090.000.592cv6A GO:0045735


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005198 GO:0019903 GO:0004842
GO-Score 0.17 0.07 0.07
Biological Processes GO:0051301 GO:0007049 GO:0008360 GO:0030031 GO:0070925 GO:0044781
GO-Score 0.54 0.54 0.50 0.35 0.35 0.35
Cellular Component GO:0005737 GO:0044461
GO-Score 0.50 0.35

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.