[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1205

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.97 16 3sbxF AMP Rep, Mult 17,18,19,54,76,80,95,98,99,115,116,117,118,120,121
20.05 1 3sbxE AMP Rep, Mult 124,127
30.05 1 3sbxD AMP Rep, Mult 127,131

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.4512q4dA0.8321.990.2800.9143.2.2.-17,45,47,49,99,110,115,117,122
20.4312q4oA0.8231.680.3140.8883.2.2.-17,48,55,99,114,119,121
30.1321qzuC0.5294.210.0760.7594.1.1.3630
40.1321f8xA0.5183.710.0720.6952.4.2.6121
50.0661wo8A0.4693.280.0860.6154.2.3.3NA
60.0662a0kA0.5183.770.0790.7012.4.2.6121
70.0661h0rA0.4524.030.1640.6424.2.1.10NA
80.0661e20A0.5524.000.0630.7654.1.1.36NA
90.0661g63B0.5294.110.0640.7544.1.1.-NA
100.0601i3kA0.5684.000.1070.7975.1.3.2NA
110.0602rh4B0.5714.220.1050.8181.3.1.-NA
120.0601g6kA0.5724.030.1010.8021.1.1.47NA
130.0601iy8A0.5723.760.1220.7861.1.1.-NA
140.0601z45A0.5703.860.1000.7915.1.3.2,5.1.3.3NA
150.0603i39X0.5844.170.0690.8401.2.99.217,173
160.0603gr6D0.5664.250.0980.8071.3.1.954
170.0601rzuB0.5673.720.1900.7652.4.1.21110,117
180.0601fduC0.5693.910.1440.7971.1.1.62122
190.0601jqkF0.5884.140.1240.8401.2.99.222,119
200.0602z8yD0.5963.880.0650.8181.2.7.4,1.2.99.2NA
210.0601q0lA0.5694.090.0990.8131.1.1.26720,34,46,59,111,121
220.0603cf4A0.5693.650.0860.7701.2.99.2NA
230.0601gz5A0.5793.590.1100.7752.4.1.15NA
240.0601sb8A0.5693.930.0570.7915.1.3.7NA
250.0603enkA0.5743.870.1450.8025.1.3.2NA
260.0601xhlA0.5673.960.0970.7971.1.1.236NA
270.0603dzcB0.5873.150.0860.7495.1.3.14114
280.0601enpA0.5674.450.0730.8341.3.1.9NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.650.8461.620.330.912a33A GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0009691 GO:0016787 GO:0016799
10.600.9270.950.730.963quaA GO:0009691 GO:0016787 GO:0016799
20.480.8821.970.260.981wekA GO:0009691 GO:0016787 GO:0016799
30.470.7912.150.270.901wehA GO:0016020 GO:0016021
40.440.8182.230.280.941t35E GO:0005829 GO:0009691 GO:0016799
50.440.8711.820.290.952q4dA GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0009691 GO:0016787 GO:0016799 GO:0042803
60.300.7332.280.240.832iz7A GO:0005829 GO:0009691 GO:0016799
70.280.8552.080.180.963gh1A GO:0005829 GO:0009691 GO:0016799
80.270.7492.470.210.871rcuA GO:0005829 GO:0009691 GO:0016799
90.070.4694.350.060.693gk0A GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0008615 GO:0016740 GO:0016769 GO:0033856
100.070.4304.760.050.682z0mA GO:0000166 GO:0003676 GO:0004386 GO:0005524 GO:0016787
110.070.4525.110.050.742xtzC GO:0000166 GO:0001789 GO:0003924 GO:0004871 GO:0005095 GO:0005525 GO:0005789 GO:0005834 GO:0005886 GO:0006571 GO:0007165 GO:0007186 GO:0008219 GO:0009094 GO:0009506 GO:0009738 GO:0009740 GO:0009749 GO:0009785 GO:0009788 GO:0009789 GO:0009845 GO:0010027 GO:0010119 GO:0010244 GO:0016020 GO:0016247 GO:0019001 GO:0031683 GO:0034260 GO:0042127 GO:0046872 GO:0071215 GO:0072593
120.060.3795.760.050.701acoA GO:0003994 GO:0005506 GO:0005634 GO:0005739 GO:0006099 GO:0006101 GO:0008152 GO:0016829 GO:0043209 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051539
130.060.3595.600.070.632b3tB GO:0003747 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006412 GO:0006415 GO:0016149 GO:0043022
140.060.3625.190.050.603icqT GO:0000049 GO:0003723 GO:0005525 GO:0005634 GO:0005635 GO:0005643 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006409 GO:0006605 GO:0006810 GO:0008033 GO:0008536 GO:0015932 GO:0016363 GO:0071528
150.060.2606.010.060.503pu2B GO:0006950
160.060.1814.890.050.292cs4A GO:0007165
170.060.1784.700.080.292gagD GO:0008115 GO:0046653 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
180.060.1744.100.060.251x4pA GO:0003676 GO:0003723 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0006396 GO:0006397 GO:0008380 GO:0044822


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016799
GO-Score 0.96
Biological Processes GO:0009691
GO-Score 0.96
Cellular Component GO:0005634 GO:0016021 GO:0005829
GO-Score 0.65 0.47 0.44

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.