[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1126c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 4 4fe1F CLA Rep, Mult 179,183
20.06 3 2fjcB FE Rep, Mult 164,173,180
30.06 3 4amjB 2CV Rep, Mult 153,180,183,190
40.06 3 4toaA FE2 Rep, Mult 178,182
50.04 2 3rkoL LFA Rep, Mult 149,152,153,183
60.04 2 1ta9A ZN Rep, Mult 28,108,125
70.02 1 1g6iA DMJ Rep, Mult 121,122,175,178
80.02 1 2g38B MN Rep, Mult 188,191,192
90.02 1 2wieA CVM Rep, Mult 131,135
100.02 1 3a9qG CA Rep, Mult 170,174
110.02 1 3gs30 III Rep, Mult 121,122,125,128,129,132,136,142,147,150
120.02 1 3dugA ZN Rep, Mult 101,145,173
130.02 1 1b8dA PEB Rep, Mult 4,8
140.02 1 1icrA NIO Rep, Mult 178,188

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601f1sA0.5055.060.0880.8264.2.2.1NA
20.0602vn7A0.4785.270.0500.7963.2.1.34
30.0601ii2A0.4675.250.0480.7414.1.1.49NA
40.0601dl2A0.4964.890.1010.7813.2.1.11311
50.0602ri9B0.5014.950.0780.7863.2.1.113NA
60.0601hcuB0.5074.870.0590.7963.2.1.11315
70.0601cleA0.4425.540.0760.7663.1.1.3NA
80.0601gaiA0.4805.250.0450.8063.2.1.3181
90.0601rw9A0.4955.320.0640.8314.2.2.5NA
100.0602pfdB0.4754.850.0770.7412.1.2.5,4.3.1.412
110.0601yggA0.4155.300.0450.6974.1.1.49NA
120.0601w6jA0.4495.830.0410.8165.4.99.7NA
130.0601xjjA0.4455.350.0840.7261.17.4.144
140.0602zbkA0.4624.610.0690.6925.99.1.317,31,36,51,93
150.0602vn4A0.4745.250.0610.8013.2.1.3178
160.0602q1fA0.4655.210.0670.7814.2.2.21NA
170.0601hn0A0.4635.530.0590.8114.2.2.20NA
180.0603dsiA0.4485.170.0450.7214.2.1.92146,187
190.0601kktA0.5034.970.0830.7913.2.1.113NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.5265.090.050.834he8I GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0008137 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0042773 GO:0048038 GO:0050136 GO:0055114
10.070.5285.160.070.864he8F GO:0005886 GO:0008137 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0042773 GO:0048038 GO:0055114
20.070.5485.370.100.924kf7A GO:0005643 GO:0006406 GO:0006606 GO:0006999 GO:0017056 GO:0031990 GO:0044611
30.070.5324.810.090.833s4wB GO:0000793 GO:0005634 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0006281 GO:0006974 GO:0007049 GO:0007129 GO:0007275 GO:0007276 GO:0010332 GO:0034599 GO:0045589 GO:0048854 GO:0050727 GO:0051090 GO:0070182 GO:0097150 GO:2000348
40.070.4514.300.050.674he8G GO:0005886 GO:0008137 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0042773 GO:0048038 GO:0055114
50.060.3775.620.040.661k9xA GO:0004180 GO:0004181 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0050897
60.060.4085.310.060.674f7rD GO:0019904
70.060.3615.600.080.611nfgA GO:0005737 GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0046872
80.060.3634.720.050.554wnlC GO:0003723 GO:0003729 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005789 GO:0005934 GO:0006810 GO:0007533 GO:0008289 GO:0008298 GO:0051028
90.060.3565.400.060.603nurA GO:0016787
100.060.3545.500.040.624dozA GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0005737 GO:0046872 GO:0051607
110.060.2865.930.030.535ahoA GO:0000075 GO:0000723 GO:0000781 GO:0000784 GO:0003684 GO:0004518 GO:0004527 GO:0005634 GO:0005694 GO:0005737 GO:0005813 GO:0005815 GO:0005856 GO:0006281 GO:0006303 GO:0006974 GO:0008409 GO:0016787 GO:0031627 GO:0031848 GO:0031860 GO:0035312 GO:0036297 GO:0090305
120.060.3394.210.070.481xlyB GO:0003723 GO:0003729 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005789 GO:0005934 GO:0006810 GO:0007533 GO:0008289 GO:0008298 GO:0051028
130.060.2995.080.090.482cjwA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003924 GO:0005516 GO:0005525 GO:0005634 GO:0005886 GO:0006955 GO:0007067 GO:0007165 GO:0007166 GO:0007264 GO:0009898 GO:0016020 GO:0019003 GO:0030496 GO:0051233 GO:0051276 GO:0051310 GO:0072686
140.060.3135.070.050.491z5xU
150.060.3265.730.050.574q0mA GO:0004067 GO:0006520
160.060.2905.280.050.481p2xA GO:0000281 GO:0000917 GO:0003779 GO:0005096 GO:0005516 GO:0005634 GO:0005635 GO:0005737 GO:0005816 GO:0005826 GO:0005856 GO:0007049 GO:0007165 GO:0007264 GO:0043087 GO:0043547 GO:0044732 GO:0051301 GO:0071341 GO:0071574 GO:1902405 GO:1903475 GO:1903477 GO:1903478 GO:1903479
170.060.3364.790.050.513llvA GO:0003676 GO:0006813
180.060.3355.870.080.614mlcA GO:0006865


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0050136 GO:0048037
GO-Score 0.37 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0022904 GO:0006119
GO-Score 0.37 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0071944
GO-Score 0.37

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.