[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1088

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.15 6 1brrC ARC Rep, Mult 32,55,59
20.08 3 5da5C GOA Rep, Mult 28,29,32,59
30.07 3 3s8gA OLC Rep, Mult 26,30,66,67,68
40.04 2 3riaB IOD Rep, Mult 6,8,9
50.04 2 5da5A FE Rep, Mult 29,59,62
60.02 1 3fyeA DMU Rep, Mult 19,21,65,66,69,70,73
70.02 1 3lw51 CLA Rep, Mult 35,38,39
80.02 1 3u7qB IMD Rep, Mult 46,49
90.02 1 3c9iB XE Rep, Mult 18,21
100.02 1 1cc1L SF4 Rep, Mult 93,124
110.02 1 2wsc4 CLA Rep, Mult 72,76
120.02 1 2xqtE CVM Rep, Mult 62,65

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0942h8aA0.5473.110.0950.7222.5.1.18NA
20.0601fbvA0.5763.250.0420.7996.3.2.19NA
30.0602z8yD0.6032.910.0490.7431.2.7.4,1.2.99.266,70,74
40.0603cf4A0.6163.790.0700.8401.2.99.2124
50.0601gu6A0.5543.260.0710.7221.7.2.2NA
60.0601b8fA0.6193.370.0690.8334.3.1.3NA
70.0603i39X0.6122.650.0830.7361.2.99.251
80.0601j3uA0.5572.970.0570.7294.3.1.1NA
90.0602uxwA0.5623.400.0530.7571.3.99.-NA
100.0601yisA0.5513.090.0280.7084.3.2.2NA
110.0602z1qB0.5723.950.0560.8191.3.99.3NA
120.0602pfmA0.5772.860.0570.7154.3.2.2NA
130.0601q5nA0.5673.160.0360.7295.5.1.250
140.0602ohyB0.6253.500.0840.8405.4.3.6NA
150.0603e04D0.5612.850.0350.7294.2.1.271
160.0601fftA0.5933.820.0680.8611.10.3.-NA
170.0601qdbA0.5672.950.0430.7081.7.2.219,63
180.0601rx0A0.5634.040.0810.8121.3.99.-NA
190.0603djlA0.5833.510.0840.7851.3.99.-NA
200.0601y2mB0.5624.040.0500.8404.3.1.24NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.100.6473.460.060.903ay5A GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0007049 GO:0051726
10.100.6912.950.080.893ripA GO:0000226 GO:0000922 GO:0000923 GO:0000930 GO:0005200 GO:0005737 GO:0005813 GO:0005815 GO:0005816 GO:0005829 GO:0005856 GO:0005874 GO:0006461 GO:0007020 GO:0007126 GO:0008274 GO:0015630 GO:0016020 GO:0031122 GO:0043015 GO:0044732 GO:0051011 GO:0051298 GO:0051415 GO:0055037 GO:0090307
20.070.6383.300.040.885flzA GO:0000226 GO:0000922 GO:0000923 GO:0000928 GO:0005200 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005813 GO:0005815 GO:0005816 GO:0005822 GO:0005824 GO:0005856 GO:0005874 GO:0007020 GO:0007126 GO:0031122 GO:0043015 GO:0051011 GO:0051298 GO:0051415 GO:0090307
30.070.6273.640.030.895flzB GO:0000226 GO:0000922 GO:0000923 GO:0000928 GO:0005200 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005813 GO:0005815 GO:0005816 GO:0005822 GO:0005824 GO:0005856 GO:0005874 GO:0007020 GO:0007126 GO:0030472 GO:0031122 GO:0043015 GO:0051011 GO:0051298 GO:0051415 GO:0090307
40.070.3455.430.060.673ec7A GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0019310 GO:0050112 GO:0055114
50.060.3314.690.040.542v57B GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
60.060.3555.120.010.633v7pA GO:0009234 GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0046872
70.060.3565.220.050.632p5oB GO:0000166 GO:0003676 GO:0003677 GO:0003887 GO:0004518 GO:0004527 GO:0006260 GO:0008408 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0016787 GO:0039693 GO:0071897 GO:0090305
80.060.3454.410.020.565ekqD GO:0009279 GO:0016020 GO:0043165 GO:0051205 GO:1990063
90.060.3304.380.030.514q9oA GO:0000287 GO:0004659 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0046872
100.060.3513.590.030.473ctdB GO:0003677 GO:0006260 GO:0006281 GO:0006310 GO:0009378 GO:0032508
110.060.3194.810.040.532wgbB GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
120.060.3874.360.020.604ii3A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004839 GO:0004842 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006464 GO:0008641 GO:0016567 GO:0016874 GO:0019941
130.060.2795.000.060.492m83A GO:0005975 GO:0005977 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
140.060.2865.520.070.562rjzA GO:0004576 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0043107 GO:0043683
150.060.2433.690.040.332o5aA GO:0005737 GO:0006417 GO:0017148 GO:0042256 GO:0090071
160.060.2703.910.070.394dx8H GO:0001525 GO:0001937 GO:0005546 GO:0005615 GO:0005737 GO:0005856 GO:0005874 GO:0005886 GO:0005911 GO:0007264 GO:0008017 GO:0010596 GO:0016020 GO:0016525 GO:0030054 GO:0030695 GO:0032092 GO:0032403 GO:0043234 GO:0045454 GO:0050790 GO:2000114 GO:2000352
170.060.3223.880.110.472na4A GO:0009279 GO:0022610 GO:0030288 GO:0042802 GO:0044010 GO:0071806
180.060.2444.350.070.381b0nA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0010629 GO:0030435 GO:0043565 GO:0046983


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005198 GO:0008017
GO-Score 0.43 0.43
Biological Processes GO:0051225 GO:0051418 GO:1902850 GO:1903046 GO:0007098
GO-Score 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43
Cellular Component GO:0043231 GO:0032155 GO:0005815 GO:0000922 GO:0099513
GO-Score 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.