[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1084

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.06 3 3wkiA BGC Rep, Mult 332,333,337,338,532
20.06 3 3wkiA GLO Rep, Mult 211,271,346,350,466,467,531,536
30.04 2 2j7nA MG Rep, Mult 321,323,325
40.02 1 2ohjA FE Rep, Mult 61,195,265
50.02 1 2b51A MN Rep, Mult 93,95
60.02 1 3rjyA GLC Rep, Mult 89,111,129
70.02 1 2ohiE FE Rep, Mult 58,66,195
80.02 1 1dogA MAN Rep, Mult 34,35,36,37,38,39
90.02 1 3c68A BMA Rep, Mult 19,87,89
100.02 1 1j7lA MG Rep, Mult 237,246
110.02 1 1dl2A UUU Rep, Mult 20,23,24,27,60,63,64
120.02 1 3azrA BGC Rep, Mult 89,135,146
130.02 1 4d4dA IFM Rep, Mult 271,346,347,350,403,467
140.02 1 1v7xA SO4 Rep, Mult 465,467,513,533,535
150.02 1 1yt3A ZN Rep, Mult 87,89,272
160.02 1 3c67B GLC Rep, Mult 37,40,41,44
170.02 1 2qs8A MG Rep, Mult 58,61,321
180.02 1 4gttB 7TQ Rep, Mult 207,208,214,275,278,282,353,467,471,528,535
190.02 1 2ri8A GOL Rep, Mult 208,212,467,533,535
200.02 1 1g6iA UUU Rep, Mult 60,63,64,69,114

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0671fp3A0.4843.040.1310.5295.1.3.8NA
20.0661nxcA0.4664.470.0950.5563.2.1.113NA
30.0601dl2A0.4684.540.0830.5603.2.1.113NA
40.0602vn4A0.4514.940.0890.5473.2.1.3520
50.0601j0mA0.3634.980.0600.4444.2.2.12NA
60.0601clcA0.4205.030.0600.5203.2.1.4NA
70.0601ft1B0.3864.440.0820.4642.5.1.58,2.5.1.-NA
80.0603ebgA0.3737.470.0500.5633.4.11.-129
90.0601fmiA0.4634.590.0940.5573.2.1.113NA
100.0601l2aE0.4444.310.0900.5233.2.1.4NA
110.0601fo2A0.4634.610.0940.5573.2.1.11325,135
120.0601ia7A0.4083.960.0870.4713.2.1.4NA
130.0601hzfA0.3593.920.1210.4133.4.21.43NA
140.0601ksdA0.4054.340.1120.4813.2.1.421,24,70
150.0602dqmA0.3747.480.0560.5723.4.11.2NA
160.0601hcuB0.4684.590.0850.5653.2.1.113NA
170.0601is9A0.3994.100.0520.4653.2.1.424
180.0601h12A0.4084.450.0840.4863.2.1.8NA
190.0602drsA0.4064.200.0600.4753.2.1.156139
200.0601n4pB0.3764.450.0750.4502.5.1.59,2.5.1.-NA
210.0601w6jA0.4174.740.0750.4955.4.99.7NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.5451.980.170.563wkgA GO:0003824 GO:0016853 GO:0047736
10.070.5152.190.150.544z4jA GO:0003824 GO:0016853 GO:0047736
20.070.5112.070.160.533vw5A GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0016853 GO:0047736
30.070.4823.470.140.542zblB GO:0003824 GO:0006044 GO:0016853 GO:0050121 GO:0061593 GO:1902777
40.070.4792.720.140.523gt5A GO:0003824
50.070.4843.040.130.531fp3A GO:0003824 GO:0004866 GO:0006044 GO:0010951 GO:0016853 GO:0019262 GO:0050121
60.060.3713.620.090.424v1rA GO:0003824
70.060.4493.110.120.492gz6A GO:0003824
80.060.4003.540.090.455agdB GO:0003824 GO:0030246
90.060.2687.460.040.413a8uX GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0016223 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
100.060.2287.360.030.352xdqB GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0015979 GO:0015995 GO:0016491 GO:0016636 GO:0016730 GO:0019685 GO:0036068 GO:0046148 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051539 GO:0055114
110.060.2007.170.050.307mdhB GO:0003824 GO:0005975 GO:0006108 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0016491 GO:0016615 GO:0016616 GO:0046554 GO:0055114
120.060.1997.600.030.315eb4A GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0016829 GO:0046593 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
130.060.2276.830.030.334h7nA GO:0004029 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0055114
140.060.1726.610.060.252lgzA GO:0004576 GO:0004579 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0008250 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0018279 GO:0043687
150.060.1756.330.060.252x4gA GO:0003824 GO:0050662
160.060.1856.800.030.273pq1A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0002134 GO:0003723 GO:0004652 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0006351 GO:0006378 GO:0006397 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0030145 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043231 GO:0044822 GO:0046872 GO:0071044
170.060.1505.230.030.193hveA GO:0004842 GO:0005737 GO:0005856 GO:0007010 GO:0016567 GO:0031463 GO:0042787
180.060.1666.860.050.244rkqA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016857
GO-Score 0.37
Biological Processes GO:1902777 GO:0006044
GO-Score 0.07 0.07
Cellular Component GO:0005737
GO-Score 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.