[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1069c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 2 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.05 3 4b2nA HEM Rep, Mult 147,192,200,202,203,237,238,239,240,242,245,257,260,282,287,361
20.05 3 4b2nA HEM Rep, Mult 329,352,419,420,421,422,424,433,434,437,440,441,556,574,578
30.03 2 1ea0A F3S Rep, Mult 298,299,300,301,302,303,304,575,579,580
40.03 2 4ln8A GAL Rep, Mult 526,530
50.03 2 1qhzA CA Rep, Mult 402,510
60.03 2 3kegA FMN Rep, Mult 526,531,535
70.03 2 3o5cB HEM Rep, Mult 145,238,239,249,256,260,284,420
80.03 2 2afmA ZN Rep, Mult 367,402,547
90.02 1 1z2lA 1AL Rep, Mult 394,463,547
100.02 1 2x5dD LLP Rep, Mult 355,549
110.02 1 4l6vf CLA Rep, Mult 272,275
120.02 1 3g5nA HEM Rep, Mult 58,61
130.02 1 3hlnI CA Rep, Mult 510,511
140.02 1 2ek8A ZN Rep, Mult 488,491,534
150.02 1 2essA CA Rep, Mult 534,547
160.02 1 3pxtA NA Rep, Mult 310,311,312,313,329,330
170.02 1 1cq1B CA Rep, Mult 430,431
180.02 1 1yvpA MG Rep, Mult 356,360,432
190.02 1 1jx4A MG Rep, Mult 381,386
200.02 1 1diiA HEM Rep, Mult 275,278

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602vhdB0.3214.850.0560.3951.11.1.5421,433,578
20.0603cmmC0.3077.960.0250.5166.3.2.19316,318
30.0602e9eA0.3027.850.0330.4961.11.1.7NA
40.0601ea0A0.2908.310.0350.4991.4.1.13NA
50.0602eabA0.3078.220.0310.5253.2.1.63261
60.0601k32A0.3178.000.0330.5303.4.21.-NA
70.0602vhdA0.3214.660.0560.3901.11.1.5255
80.0602bklB0.3117.920.0430.5163.4.21.26449
90.0602wj2A0.3067.450.0640.4823.5.1.99259
100.0602vdcF0.3237.890.0410.5261.4.1.13NA
110.0601l5jA0.3308.100.0630.5494.2.1.3NA
120.0601ofdA0.3208.230.0450.5371.4.7.1NA
130.0603ikmD0.3218.180.0330.5382.7.7.7245,250
140.0601ygpA0.3088.160.0320.5252.4.1.1NA
150.0601reqA0.3147.570.0310.4975.4.99.2NA
160.0601iqcD0.3204.560.0590.3871.11.1.5421,423
170.0601g8kA0.3088.090.0550.5161.20.98.1196
180.0601llwA0.3077.580.0320.4871.4.7.1NA
190.0602vycA0.3088.050.0250.5144.1.1.19NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.220.9351.520.100.964b2nA GO:0009055 GO:0020037 GO:0046872
10.060.3485.020.070.434fa4B GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
20.060.3427.740.040.551gqiA GO:0000272 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0009279 GO:0016020 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0033939 GO:0045493 GO:0046559 GO:2000886
30.060.3197.960.040.521mqqA GO:0000272 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0033939 GO:0045493 GO:0046559
40.060.2828.110.040.482eyqA GO:0000166 GO:0000716 GO:0003676 GO:0003677 GO:0003684 GO:0004386 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006281 GO:0006355 GO:0006974 GO:0008026 GO:0015616 GO:0016787 GO:0043175
50.060.3225.070.070.402c1vA
60.060.3194.800.060.393o5cA GO:0004130 GO:0004601 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
70.060.3214.660.060.392vhdA GO:0004130 GO:0004601 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
80.060.3224.800.070.404aamA GO:0004130 GO:0004601 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
90.060.3024.970.050.373hq6A GO:0004130 GO:0004601 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
100.060.3024.700.050.371nmlA GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
110.060.2964.750.040.363hq7A GO:0004130 GO:0004601 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
120.060.2894.820.060.354aaoA GO:0004130 GO:0004601 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
130.060.2864.720.060.351zzhB
140.060.2697.050.070.412cb1A GO:0003824 GO:0016829 GO:0030170
150.060.2207.560.040.351sezA GO:0004729 GO:0005739 GO:0006779 GO:0006782 GO:0006783 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
160.060.2567.170.030.393lp8A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0004637 GO:0005524 GO:0006164 GO:0006189 GO:0009113 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
170.060.2557.860.040.413ictA GO:0000166 GO:0003756 GO:0005623 GO:0016491 GO:0045454 GO:0050451 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
180.060.2096.910.050.321oc5A GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016162 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0030248


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0043169 GO:0046906
GO-Score 0.55 0.55
Biological Processes GO:2000886 GO:0006355 GO:0055114 GO:0000716
GO-Score 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Cellular Component GO:0005576 GO:0005829 GO:0009279 GO:0042597
GO-Score 0.12 0.06 0.06 0.06

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.