[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1060

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 3 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.15 27 3nmtA PYV Rep, Mult 40,62,64,70,72,85,87,98,101,138,147
20.10 18 2flhB ZEA Rep, Mult 24,62,70,72,101,103,105,144,147
30.06 10 4n3eF 2AN Rep, Mult 11,20,24,85,105,107,118,144,145,148
40.05 9 4ma6A 28E Rep, Mult 40,62,64,70,72,85,143,147
50.05 9 4a86A H35 Rep, Mult 24,25,37,60,72,74,83,85,105
60.03 5 4a81A 2AN Rep, Mult 8,10,24,85,105,118,120,136,139,140,144,145
70.02 4 4ryvA ZEA Rep, Mult 7,9,120,122,136,137,140
80.02 4 2wqlC P4C Rep, Mult 24,43,83,105,118,144,147
90.01 2 3kazB BU2 Rep, Mult 41,43,62,147
100.01 1 1bv10 III Rep, Mult 22,36,46,47,48,49,52,53,54,77,79
110.01 1 2vq5B LDP Rep, Mult 40,44,60,62,70,72
120.01 2 1fm4A DXC Rep, Mult 24,62,72,85,101,103,120,122,139,147
130.01 1 1fm4A DXC Rep, Mult 64,93,101,128,139,140
140.01 1 3c0vC TBR Rep, Mult 44,45,47,63
150.01 1 3c0vC TBR Rep, Mult 76,78,82,104
160.01 2 1txcA 2AN Rep, Mult 62,64,68,70,72,87,103
170.01 1 2qimA ZEA Rep, Mult 8,9,10,137,140,141
180.01 1 2vq5B HBA Rep, Mult 83,85,103,105,148

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601eg9A0.5743.990.0900.8471.14.12.12NA
20.0601qk1A0.4604.360.0650.7072.7.3.271
30.0603claA0.4794.930.0720.8092.3.1.28NA
40.0601b5sA0.4914.750.0810.8152.3.1.12NA
50.0602ii4A0.4885.160.0420.8602.3.1.16856
60.0602vq5A0.7372.740.1670.9114.2.1.7857,72
70.0601ordA0.4765.040.0210.8224.1.1.17NA
80.0601q6xA0.4645.270.0220.8472.3.1.6NA
90.0601qh4A0.4624.470.0730.7072.7.3.271
100.0601dpbA0.4914.750.1250.8152.3.1.12NA
110.0601uliC0.5773.790.0820.8411.14.12.18NA
120.0603mebA0.4694.870.0620.7832.6.1.1NA
130.0602de6B0.6463.680.0770.8921.14.12.-NA
140.0601ciaA0.4794.850.0720.8022.3.1.28NA
150.0602ihwA0.4855.270.0560.8662.3.1.168NA
160.0602fy3A0.4755.090.0910.8282.3.1.6NA
170.0601wqlA0.5733.730.0970.8341.14.12.-NA
180.0601sczA0.4704.970.0570.8022.3.1.61123
190.0602b1xA0.5993.640.0770.8601.14.12.12NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.280.6713.080.090.882leqA GO:0006950
10.270.7102.470.130.851xn6A GO:0006950
20.270.6992.690.150.871z94B GO:0006950
30.270.7402.920.110.945amwA GO:0006952 GO:0009607
40.260.7691.870.150.863cnwA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
50.260.7382.940.110.944c94A GO:0006952 GO:0009607
60.260.7392.910.100.944a80A GO:0005737 GO:0006952 GO:0009607
70.260.7712.430.120.903rt0C GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
80.250.7172.530.180.863q63F GO:0006950
90.240.6883.060.120.883q64A GO:0006950
100.240.7462.700.130.922flhB GO:0006952 GO:0009607
110.240.7572.360.120.884n0gC GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
120.240.7752.360.110.903w9rA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
130.230.7852.540.110.924oicA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
140.230.7002.420.130.832m89A GO:0006950
150.230.6913.030.120.873putB GO:0006950
160.220.7682.410.150.913kdhA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
170.220.7342.510.100.864jdlB GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
180.220.6942.990.110.873otlA GO:0006950
190.210.7412.720.090.932qimA GO:0006952 GO:0009607 GO:0046872
200.210.6822.690.150.851xn5A GO:0006950
210.210.7762.620.130.923k3kA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
220.200.7232.830.110.934m9bA GO:0006952 GO:0009607
230.200.7202.690.130.901xuvA GO:0006950
240.190.6942.690.110.851xfsA GO:0006950
250.190.6922.860.120.893pu2B GO:0006950
260.160.6722.310.100.784fpwA GO:0006950
270.160.6872.330.110.802luzA GO:0006950
280.140.7852.430.150.923nefA GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
290.140.7452.690.120.921tw0A GO:0006952 GO:0009607
300.130.7552.820.100.913ojiB GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0042803 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
310.110.6562.530.100.802nn5A GO:0006950
320.090.6412.590.130.792lcgA GO:0006950
330.070.6033.430.100.822kewA GO:0006950
340.070.6143.450.120.822i9yA GO:0006952 GO:0009607
350.070.5682.730.100.684jdlC GO:0004864 GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0009738 GO:0010427 GO:0016020 GO:0043086 GO:0080163
360.060.3355.650.060.665hm5A GO:0003677 GO:0006281 GO:0016853
370.060.3735.510.010.713a9yA GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0009000 GO:0016740 GO:0016829
380.060.3495.540.070.664knsA GO:0005507 GO:0006807 GO:0046872 GO:0050421 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0033293 GO:0042562 GO:0019212 GO:0019888 GO:0060089
GO-Score 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
Biological Processes GO:0006950 GO:0043666 GO:0044092 GO:0009755 GO:0071215
GO-Score 0.62 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
Cellular Component GO:0043231
GO-Score 0.52

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.