[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv1044

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 4 5dnmG RAX Rep, Mult 171,174
20.08 4 4kjcT MG Rep, Mult 151,155
30.06 3 3uhjC GOL Rep, Mult 90,91,92,147,148,155
40.04 2 5j1pA MN3 Rep, Mult 98,149
50.02 1 2iefB NUC Rep, Mult 59,60
60.02 1 1bjyA CTC Rep, Mult 187,191
70.02 1 3rbxA CA Rep, Mult 53,72
80.02 1 3b04D MG Rep, Mult 91,93
90.02 1 1vd5A GLY Rep, Mult 153,170
100.02 1 2xfhA CL6 Rep, Mult 153,157,170,183,184,187
110.02 1 2h6bA 3C4 Rep, Mult 20,23
120.02 1 1y66A DIO Rep, Mult 16,20
130.02 1 2jfrA MG Rep, Mult 107,142
140.02 1 3lw5K CLA Rep, Mult 169,173
150.02 1 3dfmA ZN Rep, Mult 137,142
160.02 1 3ro8A MG Rep, Mult 104,105,106

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601ta9B0.4675.970.0620.8741.1.1.6NA
20.0601vhdA0.4395.930.0560.7871.1.1.-NA
30.0601bf2A0.4215.650.0390.7303.2.1.68NA
40.0601qd1B0.3176.400.0710.6232.1.2.5,4.3.1.4NA
50.0602v4jE0.4295.930.0860.7681.8.99.3NA
60.0602pfdB0.4345.200.0880.7052.1.2.5,4.3.1.4187
70.0601xahA0.4355.950.0670.7974.2.3.4167
80.0603bfjT0.4386.090.0580.8161.1.1.202NA
90.0601kv3A0.3565.770.0880.6232.3.2.13NA
100.0601xagA0.4416.040.0720.8214.2.3.4NA
110.0602q3zA0.4285.190.0220.7052.3.2.13NA
120.0601jqoA0.4535.270.0650.7444.1.1.31NA
130.0603afhA0.4215.590.0820.7306.1.1.17133
140.0602wk5A0.4245.510.0520.7102.4.2.4NA
150.0602qubA0.4235.710.0730.7393.1.1.3NA
160.0601l5jA0.4205.450.0650.6864.2.1.3NA
170.0602gruA0.4496.110.0770.8454.2.3.-NA
180.0601rmgA0.4226.030.0270.7683.2.1.-132
190.0603bfjA0.4525.850.0720.8071.1.1.202NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.4805.920.080.891kq3A GO:0006071 GO:0008888 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0019588 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
10.070.4735.720.060.843okfA GO:0003856 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0009073 GO:0009423 GO:0016829 GO:0016838
20.070.4815.450.040.815a2vB GO:0000287 GO:0002134 GO:0004652 GO:0005524 GO:0005739 GO:0006378 GO:0030145 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043231 GO:0044822 GO:0071044
30.070.4415.750.090.811nvbB GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0003855 GO:0003856 GO:0003866 GO:0004764 GO:0004765 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0009073 GO:0009423 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0016829 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
40.070.4605.970.100.863uhjA GO:0008888 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
50.070.4755.680.050.853ce9A GO:0046872
60.070.4525.850.070.813bfjA GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0047516 GO:0055114
70.070.4854.950.060.743owgA GO:0000166 GO:0004652 GO:0005524 GO:0006351 GO:0006397 GO:0016740
80.070.4475.750.060.781vhdA GO:0000166 GO:0005829 GO:0008106 GO:0016491 GO:0018455 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:1990002
90.070.4365.880.070.804fr2A GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
100.070.4376.020.080.834rgqB GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006650 GO:0008654 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0050492 GO:0055114
110.060.4095.770.050.745br4A GO:0004022 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0006004 GO:0008198 GO:0008912 GO:0016491 GO:0019301 GO:0019317 GO:0042355 GO:0042846 GO:0046872 GO:0051143 GO:0055114
120.060.4805.750.080.874mcaA GO:0008888 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
130.060.4575.880.090.833zdrA GO:0004022 GO:0006066 GO:0008152 GO:0008774 GO:0015976 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
140.060.3815.350.050.623pq1A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0002134 GO:0003723 GO:0004652 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0006351 GO:0006378 GO:0006397 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0030145 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043231 GO:0044822 GO:0046872 GO:0071044
150.060.3805.760.070.683iv7A GO:0016491 GO:0018506 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
160.060.4505.890.070.813owoA GO:0004022 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
170.060.4496.110.080.852gruA GO:0009073 GO:0016829 GO:0016838 GO:0017000 GO:0046872
180.060.4065.890.080.731oj7A GO:0000302 GO:0005829 GO:0008106 GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0018455 GO:0033721 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:1990002


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0043169
GO-Score 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0044710
GO-Score 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0005739
GO-Score 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.