[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0990c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.14 7 4fh2A MA4 Rep, Mult 131,148,150,193
20.06 3 3s4lA CA Rep, Mult 192,218
30.06 3 2i13B GOL Rep, Mult 202,205
40.04 2 3tewA MXE Rep, Mult 66,67,68,99,101
50.02 1 4gosA BMA Rep, Mult 171,173
60.02 1 1y10C CA Rep, Mult 148,149
70.02 1 1qgdB TPP Rep, Mult 138,142,201,204
80.02 1 1t5bA FMN Rep, Mult 69,74
90.02 1 4dz2A CA Rep, Mult 152,153
100.02 1 1b0pA SF4 Rep, Mult 137,143,144,145,146,147,176
110.02 1 4ryoA MPG Rep, Mult 200,204
120.02 1 5d92D 8K6 Rep, Mult 194,204
130.02 1 1thzA 326 Rep, Mult 138,195,197,198
140.02 1 2o8mB III Rep, Mult 40,42

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602ocaA0.3756.010.0570.6703.6.4.12140,199,213
20.0601p4rA0.4026.110.0780.7342.1.2.3,3.5.4.10NA
30.0601n1hA0.3746.130.0520.6652.7.7.48217
40.0601z0hB0.3356.260.0360.6333.4.24.69196
50.0602np0A0.3986.210.0600.7393.4.24.69NA
60.0601fohC0.3745.750.0520.6511.14.13.7NA
70.0603ikmD0.3776.210.0540.7112.7.7.775
80.0601bglA0.3176.490.0650.6243.2.1.23NA
90.0601itzA0.3846.060.0560.6972.2.1.197,98
100.0601rm6A0.3836.220.0530.6931.3.99.20NA
110.0601jroB0.3786.220.0750.6931.1.1.204NA
120.0601br2A0.3565.690.0980.6153.6.1.32NA
130.0602qtcB0.4256.220.0420.7941.2.4.1132
140.0601itzB0.3735.820.1070.6512.2.1.1130,215
150.0601ug9A0.3756.230.0590.6973.2.1.7077
160.0601jrpB0.3466.300.0460.6381.17.1.484,89
170.0601l8aA0.3456.230.0720.6331.2.4.1NA
180.0602pdaA0.4006.060.0470.7111.2.7.1203
190.0602dkiA0.3915.560.0390.6561.14.13.23NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.300.6553.370.140.803teeA GO:0042597 GO:0044781
10.190.4874.290.140.663frnA
20.060.3826.080.090.712e6kA GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
30.060.3296.360.030.611ay0A GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0005737 GO:0006098 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
40.060.3876.180.070.723uptA GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
50.060.3756.010.060.672ocaA GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0004386 GO:0005524 GO:0016787
60.060.3886.390.070.724xeuA GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
70.060.3806.020.040.684c7vA GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
80.060.4065.880.080.724kxwA GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005777 GO:0005829 GO:0005999 GO:0006098 GO:0008152 GO:0009052 GO:0016740 GO:0031982 GO:0040008 GO:0042803 GO:0043209 GO:0046166 GO:0046872 GO:0048037 GO:0070062
90.060.3376.490.050.642j42A GO:0005576 GO:0009405 GO:0051260
100.060.3846.060.060.701itzA GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0008152 GO:0009507 GO:0009535 GO:0009536 GO:0009579 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0019253 GO:0046872
110.060.3666.530.040.702f2hA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0042802 GO:0061634 GO:0080176
120.060.3286.070.040.603jcrV GO:0000245 GO:0000398 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005681 GO:0006397 GO:0007049 GO:0008270 GO:0008380 GO:0016579 GO:0036459 GO:0046872 GO:0051301
130.060.3886.400.060.731r9jB GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
140.060.3696.370.060.693m49A GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
150.060.3375.700.050.593rimA GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0040007 GO:0046872
160.060.3346.490.030.653s5mA GO:0003824 GO:0004222 GO:0006508 GO:0008270 GO:0016485 GO:0016787 GO:0020011 GO:0020020 GO:0042540 GO:0046872
170.060.4405.540.070.744namA GO:0000122 GO:0001933 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0005886 GO:0009405 GO:0010008 GO:0010629 GO:0035897 GO:0042802 GO:0043409 GO:0044533 GO:0046872 GO:0051260 GO:0061136 GO:0097300 GO:1903140
180.060.3196.460.030.623s5kA GO:0003824 GO:0004222 GO:0006508 GO:0008270 GO:0016485 GO:0016787 GO:0020011 GO:0020020 GO:0042540 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016744 GO:0043169
GO-Score 0.36 0.36
Biological Processes GO:0044781
GO-Score 0.30
Cellular Component GO:0042597
GO-Score 0.30

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.